MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD FROM MARSHALL S. CARTER
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP80B01676R001400040006-9
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
S
Document Page Count:
25
Document Creation Date:
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date:
September 23, 2004
Sequence Number:
6
Case Number:
Publication Date:
July 24, 1964
Content Type:
MFR
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP80B01676R001400040006-9.pdf | 1.18 MB |
Body:
(
Approved Forlease 2004/10/20:
N4 tr. MORANDUM FOR THE R
:11';1:1
167 001400040006-9
ILLEGI
1. This is a brief of the executive session of USIB that took place
Wednesday, 22 July, at 11:50. Present were the regular members of USIB,
plus Dr. MclYillan of NRO, who is a member, for NRO :natters, of USIB,
and !Jr. Fubini, who appeared at the request of McCone. because Dr.
Irubini represents Secretary Vance sad Mr. McNamara on NiO matters, and
the responsibility for NRO is shared equally by DCI and the Secretary of
Defense. I r-,,a1.,e a point of this because it explains why they were there and
why the Director did not bring in his opposite member. the monitor of
Dr. .16,heelon, or why he did not have John Bross, or or someone 25
else. This was the membership. So the only true outsider was Fuhini.
Mr. cCone mentioned both of these points prior to making his opening
remarks. He said the question that be was faced with was the establishment
of requirements for overhead reconnaissance, and by requirements he re-
ferred not alone to targets that had to be covered, but the degree of resolu-
tion, and accordingly, therefore, the swath width, since they were related,
and he felt that the U. S. Intelligence Board had perhaps been derelict in its
duties over the years in not making these requirements clearly understood
by the NEO or by other collection agencies. He said that in June of 1960,
USIB had gone to the Secretary of Defense in a memorandum -- and I think
he quoted the subject, "Intelligence Requirements for Satellite Reconnaissance."
It was an old paper. It was two months after the shootdown of the U-2, but was
prior to the collection of any satellite reconnaissance. And he quoted from
this paper, indicating that the requirement udsted for a photographic system
capable of object resolution of 25X
on a side; however. the 100-foot resolution -- and apparently that was then a
concept in satellite reconnaissance -- would be utilized to the maximum
extent possible. Mr. McCone pointed out that subsequently he had been con-
cerned about this whole problem, even without the knowledge of this letter,
and that in April of '63, USIB had considered updating the requirements on
NRO and had asked COlviOR to review these requirements and to establish a
new set, providing to USIB the guidance whieb the DCI and Sec Def could then
give to NEO, and that at that time that the paper should be discussed and
coordinated and at least talked over with the NRO. Mr. McCone pointed out
that COL OR did this, and submitted the paper to d#4*311?, I presume, in
April, and that to September of 1963. NRO expressed a ntunber of reservations
on the paper -- not back to USIB, apparently, but perhaps to COMOE. In any
event, all this is what Mr. McCone said at the meeting.
Z. At this point, then, Yiefer, acting for McMillan - and I am still
quoting Mr. McCone -- got together with (X)MOR and they met a couple of
times to see if they couldn't come up with an agreed paper. At thie point,
NRO and DIA review(s) completed.
25X1 Approved For Release 2004/10/20 : CIA-R
P80601676R001400040006-9
P80601676R001400040006-9
25X1
25X1
" Approved For lease 2004/10/20 : ClAzgDR80601676601400040006-9
,
Mr. McMillan said, apparently DIA. was advised by Secretary Gilpatrie that
any views DIA put into the COMOR-puto machinery should be submitted to
him, Secretary Gilpatric, prior thereto for, apparently, DOD approval.
Gilpatric left. and Secretary Vance toe IT over, and there has been no prog-
ress in this field. The DIA. paper, which was submitted to Fubini's office,
namely to Augenstein, never came down from that office back to DIA or into
any other portion of the machinery, and accordingly. DIA has had no authority
to proceed. At this point. rubini interjected and said that is not true, that is
false. But McMillan countered by saying -well,, he was still checking. At
this point a parg athetical comment by me, itNiue subsequently brought out
that Fubini had the papers in his hand and apparently his office had been
hatching them throughout this entire period, although this admission was not
clear-cut.
3. 2vicCone said again that he felt that US1B was deficient, since they
had not established requirements, and he felt that we must do it -- we, being
USIB. Be said that on 18 March Dr. McMillan had briefed USI B on new systems
that covered several search systems -- some going halfway between the EB-4
and he had mentioned rather casually.
6. fie pointed out that there were three things, then, that might be
done and his problem was: do we go parallel or do we place priorities on
these two? He said that all the new systems have serious technical problems
25X1 which may foreclose any one of thorn. I
NRO
Fie said all of these thing. must be explored before
they can be accepted as a system for the expenditures of heavy money. Fe
25X1
Approved For Release 2
004/10/20 : CIA-RD
25
25
4
4/10/20 : CIA-RDP
Approved For !arse 2004/10i -:.HCIA-RDP80B0167601400040006-9
25
said there was not enough money to take care of both of these approacies in
the FY '65, although there might be some reapportionment activities within
the FY '65 NRO tentative program if we really dug into it. He said, there-
fore, that USIB should express itself as to the input that was required for
the intelligence inventory. Where should the major effort be placed? Should
we keep CORONA as & sparcb program and develop or should we 25
r getting the swath width 9 Be said we must answer
25X1go all out on
all the imponderable, of both systems just as quickly as we can through re-
search and the proving of those still doubtful components, and then decide
on one or the other, or on both.
25X1
8. Ile said that he 111&11 in a dilemma, since he thinks we were negligent in
not forcing the issue through the COMOR-NRO machinery. On the other hand,
he said he didn't know what would be gained,, because it was only two days ago
that he had the slightest concept of whati was, and it was only a mouth ago 25
25X1 when' started to settle down. So maybe really nothing would have
been proven had we put this thing in writing.
9. At this point Fubini said, "Leek, there is no fiscal ceiling on the
NRO or on NRO research and development" -- if there is a good case presented
which convinces the Secretary of Defense and Mr. McCone, then he is sure
that more funding will be possible. He said its quite likely that we can carry
on both programs simultaneously, if the proper case is made with Sec Def and
DCI. Be says what we have to knew is what does USIli need and how well can
you make the case in support of these needs. Mc/villan seemed to cast some
doubt on this, because he said he was still torn and bleeding from the beatings
he'd been getting from Mr. McNamara on money and savings, and so forth.
Fubini then held up this stack of papers which be said were the papers from
DIA and the NRO, and he said they could be extremely helpful, there was a
great body of information is these papers, although he did not agree with some
of it. These were obviously the papers 1 had referred to previously,
10. Fubini said two and a hall years ago, Charyk had asked bids for a
payload to be carried by the Titan 3 and weighing up to 20.000 pounds. capable
of low orbit, and they had asked I and 25
25X1 and that subsequently all the copies of these proposals and bids
had been burned at the direction of the Department of Def011/0,1 but he. Fubini,
had a remarkable espionage system and he had a copy of all of these. Be did
not offer to provide them to anyone. This was designed for very broad cover-
age and a small resolution, He said 25X
Approved For Release 200
80601676R001400040006-9
25
25X1
25X1
5X1
sirh
' Approved For ease 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80B016711001400040006-9
r 7,117.
Kodak had nether at
would appear to hal
This was all that
be don't know.
they are now bringing up to date,
entioned at this paint. What this might
11, Mr. McCone Amid it is not the province of USIB or COVOR to say
how the camera. works, or what the machinery will be to acquire the rAeces -
Nary resolution or the necessary swath width. It is lop to them to say what
areas are of important priority interest. And to establish the needs for these
acquisitions. said he wanted WIC to townie., what we get on marginal
resolution. For example, he said, we used the CORONA camera in the U-2
over Cuba and it really didn't help us any from the intelligence viewpoint,
even though the resolution was considerably greater than the regular U-2
camera.
12. At this point, General Blake said be was greatly impressed by the
weather limitations, and that while the present search may not give us enough
resolution, reducing the swath coverage greatly increases the weather prob-
lem. I can awe the relationship here. 14e said we must continue to broaden
the coverage with the greatest resolution we can, and that really, because of
weather and other factors, at times we seem to be doing our requirements
work in somewhat of a vacuum.
13. Mclvfillan said there had been considerable analysis of one factor
swath width - but in search we need coT%tiersons territorial coverage with a
reasonable number of missions at a raaaonable cost. Be said what is the
size of the area that must be examined in one picture? He said that there
bad been considerable analysis of the dimension of targets, that of the 600
targets they had bean told to concentrate on, only two were larger than 50
miles in diameter, and that these were both missile complexes. that of all
the rest 95% had a diameter of less than three miles ? so that we had to
consider swath width versus economy. He said that in order to pick up all
the targets by pointing -- and by this I think he meant spot pointing -- the
operation gets very expensive. He said technical requirements imply the
need for coverage of some breadth -- say search in a limited area some -
25X1 thing on the order o
14. At this point, General Thomas said as far as they're concerned
the Air Forces are still far from giving up either search or spot and the
Air Force says their technical intelligence requirements are
Admiral Taylor said the Navy's stated technical requirement is
25X1 I He also said that NPIC should be able to tell us what resolution
could reasonably settle for to meet the limits of both technical intelli-
Eence and any other types of intelligence. As a matter of fact, there are
astro -physical limitations which you reach, I think, when you get in the
25X1 neighborhood of certatnly_by,the time you get to
25X1 Approved For Release 200
4/10/20 : CIA-RE
P80601676R001400040006-9
25X
25
25
4/10/20 : CIA-RD
25X1
you*
Approved Foirlease 2004/1(y21A-RDP806016e001400040006-9
_
exceedingatmospheric tattoos that you might expect.
15. McMillan said there has not been much experisace with
resolution and we still bad a lot to learn in this area. Mr. Mc Cone said that
there was really no limit to the demands for technical intelligence, that the
intelligence guys would like to count every bolt and every nut in a piece et
machinery. From the USIS viewpoint. on the other hand, in the broad look --
IRBMS's and so forth there is a lower limit past which resolution does
not raaterially help, although and so forth, could
be helped greatly by greater resolution.
25X1
with NRO inputs through the NRO membership and possibly Kiefer or others
joining in. lie hoped also -- looking directly at Fubini - that DIA could
reflect their views without DOD influence and delay and procrastination.
Fubini felt that needle, I might add, right up to his navel.
18. Futrini says it has been his experience that it takes six to eight
years to develop an operational airplane, and at least two and a half to
three and a half years to develop an operational satellite with its payload.
This would mean that there would be nothing in the inventory, at the earliest.
before the end of 1966, which would be a new system, and that an interim
capability by improvements could be done more timely. I think here he was
probably looking ahead to as brought
out by the briefing yesterday.
19. Mr. McCeme agrees that we've got to get on with this right away,
that we've got to provide NRO Nome programming guidance on the USIB re-
quirements in the form of resolution and swath width, and particularly we
25X1 Approved For Release 20C
-71
P80601676R001400040006-9
25X1
* Approved For *ease 2004/1 oigo ,:t1A--RDP8060167g01400040006-9
should start programming our current assets to cover our China require
manta in the fall when the weather starts getting good. He felt says tbat
CON101- and NRC) were on top a this, but he threw it in again as a tinr.
McMillan said be would immediately look into the possible use of pulling
some of our Lanyards; out of the stockpile and cranking them up in a few
inesittug for the possibility of targeting of Odra. I then pointed out that after
beasts. Fuhini's counnents about the budget. I felt like the boy who was
asked dap you want chocolate ice cream or vanilla ice cream and he said I
want bora sad lots of it.
Marshall S. Carter
Lieutenant General, USA
Deputy ai rector
Approved For Release 200
/
_
80601676R001400040006-9
25
25
-1
Approved For fp ase 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80B01671101400040006-9
22 Tuly 1964
DDCI,
1648-1717 hours DDCI's Office
Mr. Bross
,/ DDCI:, This is a brief of the executive session of
USIB that took place! today; Wednesday, Tilly 22nd, at 11:50. Present were
the regular members of USIB, plus Dr. McMillan of NRO, who is a member,
for NRO matters, of USIB, and Dr. Fubini, who appeared at the request of
Mr. McCone, because Dr. Fubini represents Secretary Vance and
Mr. McNamara on NRO matters, and the responsibility for NRO is shared
equally by DCI and the Secretary of Defense. I make a point of this
because it explains why they were there and why the Director did not bring
in his opposite member, the monitor of NRO, Dr. Wheelon, or why he did
not have you, John Bross, or you ,4 or someone else. This was the
membership. So the only true outsider was Fubini. Mr. McCone
mentioned both of these points prior to making his opening remarks. He
said the question that he was faced with was the establishment of require-
ments for overhead reconnaissance, and by requirements he referred not
alone to targets that had to be covered, but the degree of resolution, and
accordingly, therefore, the swath width, since they were related, and he
felt that the U. S. Intelligence Board had perhaps been derelict in its
duties over the years in not making these requirements clearly understood
1
Approved For Release 2004/10/ :C1A-RDP80B01676R0014000400Cr
ii C flt;'.;;)
Approved For ease 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80B016711031400040006-9
by the NRC or by other collection agencies. He said that in Tune of
1960 USIB had gone to the Secretary of Defense in a memorandum -- and
I think he quoted the subject, "Intelligence Requirements for Satellite
Reconnaissance. " It was an old paper. It was two months after the
shootdown of the U-2, but was prior to the collection of any satellite
reconnaissance. And he quoted from this paper, indicating that the
requirement existed for a photographic system capable of object resolution
of
however, the
100-foot resolution -- and apparently that was then a concept in satellite
reconnaissance -- would be utilized to the maximum extent possible.
Mr. McCone pointed out that subsequently he had been concerned about
this whole problem, even without the knowledge of this letter, and that in
April of 163 USIB had considered updating the requirements on NRC and
had asked comsR to review these requirements and to establish a new set,
providing to USIB the guidance which the DCI and Sec Def could then give
to NRC, and that at that time that the paper should be discussed and
coordinated and at least talked over with the NRC. Mr. McCone pointed
out that COlVLOR did this, and submitted the paper to I presume,
in April, and that in September of 1963 NRC expressed a number of
reservations on the paper -- not back to USIB, apparently, but perhaps to
Approved For Release 2004/1
2
RDP80B01676R001400040006-9
25
Approved For ease 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80B0167.01400040006-9
CO1VISR. In any event, al11I2m doing is telling you now what Mr. McCone
said at the meeting. !Don't correct me until we get all through. :
At this point, then, (Keefer), acting for McMillan -- and I am
still quoting Mr. McCone -- got together with COMOR and they met a
couple of times to see if they couldn't come up with an agreed paper. At
this point, Mr. McMillan said, apparently DIA was advised by Secretary
Gilpatric that any views DIA put into the COMOR-NRO machinery should
be submitted to him, Secretary Gilpatric, prior thereto for, apparently,
DOD approval. Gilpatric left, and Secretary Vance took over, and there
has been no progress in this field. The DIA paper, which was submitted
to Fubini's office, namely to Augenstein, never came down from that
office back to DIA or into any other portion of the machinery, and accord-
ingly DIA has had no authority to proceed. At this point Fubini interjected
and said that is not true, that is false. But McMillan countered by saying -
well, he was still checking. At this point a paranthetical comment by me,
it was subsequently brought out that Fubini had the papers in his hand and
apparently his office had been hatching them throughout this entire period,
although this admission was not a clear-cut '
McCone said again that he felt that USIB was deficient, since they
had not established requirements, and he felt that we must do it -- we,
being USIB. He said that on 18 March Dr. McMillan had briefed USIB on
Approved For Release 2004/10/20 :,014-RDP430B01676R001400040006-9
'
7
Approved For *ase 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80601676.1400040006-9
new systems that covered several search systems -- some going halfway
between the KH-4
-- and he had mentioned, rather casually,
He pointed out that there were three things, then, that might be
done -- and his problem was: do we go parallel or do we place priorities
on these two? He said that all the new systems have serious technical
problems which may foreclose any one of them. For example, Eastman
Kodak system depends on a very rapid new film speed -- they pointed out
approximately 60% increase over present film speeds. Mr. McCone said
Approved For Release 2004/10/20 :161A-RDP80601676R001400040006-9
25
Approved For 1410ase 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80B0167601400040006-9
there was a problem of stabilization of the vehicle, as well as greatly
increased weight, as well as the size of the mirrors that were really a
quantum jump in lens and mirror development. He said all of these
things must be explored before they can be accepted as a system for the
expenditures of heavy money. He said there was not enough money to
take care of both of these approaches in the FY '65, although there might
be some reapportionment activities within the FY '65 NRC tentative program
if we really dug into it. He said, therefore, that USIB should express
itself as to the input that was required for the intelligence inventory. Where
should the major effort be placed? Should we keep Corona as a search
25X1 program and develop I
or should we go all out on
getting the swath width? He said we must answer all the imponderables
of both systems just as quickly as we can through research and the proving
of those still doubtful components, and then decide on one or the other, or
on both.
He said that he was in a dilemma, since he thinks we were
negligent in not forcing the issue through the COMOR-NRO machinery.
Approved For Release 2004/1q201CIA-RDP80B01676R001400040006-9
'
25
25
Approved For ease 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80B01676.1400040006-9
On the other hand, he said he didn't know what would be gained, because
it was only two days ago that he had the slightest concept of what
and it was only a month ago when
really
.maybe/nothing would have been proven had we put this thing in writing.
At this point Rubin') who had obviously been hatching something
over there, said, "Look, there is no fiscal ceiling on the NRO or on NRO
research and development" -- if there is a good case presented which
convinces the Secretary of Defense and Mr. McCone, then he is sure that
more funding will be possible. He said it's quite likely that we can carry
on both programs simultaneously, if the proper case is made with Sec Def
and DCI. He says what we have to know is what does USIB need and how
well can you make the case in support of these needs. McMillan seemed
to cast some doubt on this, because he said he was still torn and bleeding
from the beatings he'd been getting from Mr. McNamara on money and
savings, and so forth. Fubini then held up this stack of papers which he
said were the papers from DIA and the NRO, and he said they could be
extremely helpful, there was a great body of information in these papers,
although he did not agree with some of it. These were obviously the papers
I had referred to previously.
started to settle down. So
was, 25X1
Fubini said two and a half years'Charyk had asked bids for a
payload to be carried by the Titan 3 and weighing up to 20, 000 pounds,
Approved For Release 2004/10/200Alkty'80B01676R001400040006-9
13
25
25X1
25X1
25X1
Approved For ease 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80B0167601400040006-9
capable of low orbit, and they had asked
and that subsequently all the copies of
these proposals and bids had been burned at the direction of the Depart-
ment of Defense, but he, Fubini, had a remarkable espionage system
and he had a copy of all of these. He did not offer to provide them to
anyone. This was designed for very broad coverage and a small resolution,
He said Eastman Kodak had another
study, which they are now bringing up to date, which would appear to be a
This was all
that was mentioned at this point. What this might be I don't know.
Mr. McCone said it is not the province of USIB or COMOR to say
how the camera works, or what the machinery will be to acquire the
necessary resolution or the necessary swath width. It is up to them to say
what areas are of important priority interest, and to establish the needs
for these acquisitions. He said he wanted NPIC to examine what we get on
marginal resolution. For example, he said, we used the Corona camera
in the U-2 over Cuba and it really didn't help us any from the intelligence
viewpoint, even though the resolution was considerably greater than the
regular U-2 camera.
At this point General Blake said he was greatly impressed by the
weather limitations, and that while the present search may not give us
Approved For Release 2004/10/20 :`Cl j*R1A04301676R001400040006-9
25
Approved For Oase 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80601676.1400040006-9
enough resolution, reducing the swath coverage greatly increases the
weather problem. I can see the relationship here. He said we must
continue to broaden the coverage with the greatest resolution we can,
and that really, because of weather and other factors, at times we seem
to be doing our requirements work in somewhat of a vacumn.
McMillan said there had been considerable analysis of one
factor - swath width - but in search we need continuous territorial
coverage with a reasonable number of missions at a reasonable cost.
He said what is the size of the area that must be examined in one picture?
He said that there had been considerable analysis of the dimension of
targets, that of the 600 targets they had been told to concentrate on, only
two were larger than 50 miles in diameter, and that these were both
missile complexes, that of all the rest 95% had a diameter of less than
three miles -- so that we had to consider swath width versus economy.
He said that in order to pick up all the targets by pointing -- and by this
I think he meant spot pointing -- the operation gets very expensive. He
said technical requirements imply the need for coverage of some breadth --
say search in a limited area something on the order of
At this point General Thomas said as far as they're concerned
the Air Forces are still far from giving up either search or spot, and the
Approved For Release 2004/10/20 :8CIA-RDP80601676R001400040006-9
25
25
25X1
25X1
Approved For ease 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP8060167601400040006-9
Air Force says their technical intelligence requirements are
Admiral Taylor said the Navy's stated technical requirement
is He also said that NPIC should be able to tell us what resolution
we could reasonably settle for to meet thelimits of both technical intelligence
and any other types of intelligence. As a matter of fact, there are astro-
physical limitations which you reach, I think, when you get in the neighbor-
25X1 hood of
-- certainly by the time you get to
exceeding atmospheric limitations that you might expect.
McMillan said there has not been much experience with
resolution and we still had a lot to learn in this area. Mr. McCone said that
25
you are 25X1
there was really no limit to the efineness) require for technical intelligence,
that the intelligence guys would like to count every bolt and every nut in a
piece of machinery. From the USIB viewpoint, on the other hand, in the
broad look -- IRMS's and so forth -- there is a lower limit past which
resolution does not materially help, although
so forth, could be helped greatly by greater resolution.
25
and 25
9
Approved For Release 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80601676R001400040006-9
25
Approved For FOase 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80B01676.1400040006-9
to work on this at once, with NRC inputs through the NRC membership and
possibly Keefer or others joining in. He hoped also -- looking directly at
Fubini -- that DIA could reflect their views without DOD influence and delay
and procrastination. Fubini felt that needle, I might add, right up to his
navel.
Fubini says it has been his experience that it takes six to eight
years to develop an operational airplane, and at least two and a half to
Approved For Release 2004/10/20 :11111A-WP801301676R001400040006-9
25
Approved For *Ise 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80B0167601400040006-9
three and a half years to develop an operational satellite with its payload.
This would mean that there would be nothing in the inventory, at the
earliest, before the end of 1966, which would be a new system, and that
an interim capability by improvements could be done more timely. I think
here he was probably looking ahead tol
as brought out by the briefing yesterday.
Mr. McCone agrees that we've got to get on with this right away,
that we've got to provide NRC some programming guidance on the USIB
requirements in the form of resolution and swath width, and particularly
we should start programming our current assets to cover our China require-
ments in the fall when the weather starts getting good. He felt sure that
COMAR and NRC were on top of this, but he threw it in again as a reminder.
McMillan said he would immediately look into the possible use of pulling
some of our Lanyards out of the stockpile and cranking them up in a few
months for the possibility of targeting of China. I then pointed out that after
hearing Fubini's comments about the budget, I felt like the boy who was
asked do you want chocolate ice cream or vanilla ice cream and he said I
Fr-Th
want both and lots of it. 1 And with this Mr. McCone told the story of the
skipper of of the carrier who had invited his wife and two children to come
down and have lunch with them, and they came down in their car, and were
met by boys and the Executive Officer, and taken up to the captain's
Approved For Release 2004/1
11
,-.,-GPIrRDP80B01676R001400040006-9
Approved For Flpase 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80B0167601400040006-9
wardroom area, and they sat down in plush chairs, and the Filipino boys
came in and served them this and that and everything else, and then they
were taken into this lovely dining room, with the sterling silver and the
beautiful pictures and the lovely view out on the harbor, and were served
this beautiful lunch, and everything was delightful, and they were escorted
back down past the , and down the gangplank, and they got into this
beat-up old Ford, and one little boy turned to his mother and said:
Mommie, why is it daddy's so rich and we're so poor? (Laughing) So
that's about the meeting. That's the end of the Memorandum for the Record.
Approved For Release 2004/10/20 : t3A-RDP80B01676R001400040006-9
Approved For ease 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80B0167.1400040006-9
ILLEGIB
N Plc Imel?r- 104- -Cur- nrpce?
rer Sii-,743/
O)&J4J47. Of
-C?tiv444;ii rvn 7?
Case o:374e See-t./
Alk _
ad_ 7,Arre,.
cpaS& 4i'
uroug40
25X1 /oLd ARA_
I.
- C2 fi)10.1,44.,4 (40640-r 41,44-0(
piv Ne"ru,?) rep ,40411, "zur 04.11?
`1 cc1-/feei).700 AM-6 ?
190160 4.0-42"/ c;1( iie74
25
63
rp-4yer
e0J4 wego a_44.7?.4
,,eets\-4
rig-"---10 0.- p74.----
A-4.- q
r-s, 9.84
`11 13,14d
fftfeci---
040416-9
Approved PettlikteaVaP/414K0 WAPF4B0
Approved For Ripse 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80B0167601400040006-9
Approved For lipase 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80601676.1400040006-9
41.1( ,ozr,01,
494-4-14---at ati-v
(61Tfri.airt
(Ar,`-th?"
10....vdrass,(
/40--pyt? dy0 t4Aorl-rzAr
_qnobwirk-//%4, iLtit-rt-C-AIJI-C-
0,04041 6,9 110.4141 144-0%-u*-7
ii4.4v14r?h4z4e._ beeet._
leteC ton- t116--tfrj(1^-
0570 eig-k?e4 ,e4re-csa au-4.Ar chv V-6
1-474.11
1441-4A4 tAvor- -giyAr4< A-
Vaer, a.? /Ao...erszt, iki-gdp 25
(Stc, 4 %Fere, j 25
-w ct4i Lerk, e-a7n-e-??. tot-
re-4iL44'rA_ "491-tr-1,1-7 47?
c9g.4.46 67.te___ kLetivi .-
412-e- IA-V
ht44-LJ, vt-w76-
6 I/e0-ociAl
NA4t1-4k 0y0 r4-041,
Approved For Release 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80601676R001400040006-9
25
Approved For se 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80B0167601400040006-9
?
?
LAI
tf Ira?
q-7 C4tL..
c.?
bv-Pet/ Aewqm4.0..t-
C414Le_.- 12e_
4A-A-4c_ vir:htt Sat=0, _
kArko-N cyttA4 we4 _
Afigitv
Mk_
fra-A----'-P I 024 4664?
.(3/ (J5-ke
27-7)--yrfl , GIA4-14_ ae,-4440. 424,
t7/6:4,-/lit4rebyr pzyet-04
I 041 ?cor-a- tb4-4-4-4/
4714 A44? u 04-e-t_14( 4.06
25
1,7-0444 ccb-evay
vt frit,c,./0 ope a.---Ce7r2ek a1/40 cl-e) ketj
cAtTsy-k-ok a41 cp;:its
AA") tAr-0.0--,v4410.t 1e
4?Jr4-44.14, kual, kle-tet-
Approv4WefiA4rea$YRdo0/4t: Cati9IL,?0130' .167~04041-9tie4?..
25X1
Approved For ease 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80B01676.1400040006-9
au.,? 144-vrIpA-4 -
C 4-044(
L I
1`14tfr--7---
?
174-vagk 417 0,44/-- ktkA,
"9,42-0c,r,&_ vt:,(1.- NoLe-etd-ceZ
CIAA-4-xrc_ ?
P11,404- C44A )4) 4AS.
-
CYt--b? bc0-6 , krvrie? v-Azttuoi-
ige-P1 ? j a-10 14 Olet.e .rei-eYrtr` R"e4112-?4
--et#444. 41e-rn &11:14 t*P-441 144 . 144:ftte. Agee-ACI
IAPAi4 L?46):4L CIA4..et ?-e,V1?1? ht-t -
?1 P-Z4v%t Ca4iL" LLI-?C
01-1--444tp 4e-e9 "Irk
/are- kr0 A4i.)10
441 r44', 9.1r%/. Atoc kZ. i 04-44-4
(5-w-ta-tv kA-site% vr, Vt,
`Ar a'a? eo-,A43/
_ "2-ova._ p?. IirtuAof
/ray n9 14-14 01,0 /
l2X;1 44"`Prat,.4-r---.7
14P-- fralti
- 4V-- te,'It7S "te7
C -,04141%,4?C
4.41Lie-1942ivelt..ovi
ApprowtFceitaleasp20140/20r4Q}A-13DPBOB01676R001400040006-9
25X
Approved For ease 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP8060167601400040006-9
/101 "491'. nt"It. 41194'14"44 te:"4.
MCC 11- 11;v1rad.a.t.e
k
Fr7A,,,, UT- / tr'Z . iceo-ANJ Jzi?
to-e-te- p-gtoki--
K.64^ kar edA-4.0
ere,4a-et7
1-44-1P-Lizr
25X1
25X1
25
A
44,
A
-FM fri-tre-Tn- hk:x40
Clyzuk. Frvu?.1
idt>ittL.14.-ptL `/--e-eA ca-r>3-1,044'
25X1
Approved For Release 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80601676R001400040006-9
,
Approved For Retse 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP801301676.1400040006-9
re1441117
?0-42,A,74.
cc-or>C--
at4h 1-1,11"fig-
P-te h10
I.
1,4 ced,_
ettg-oy---
14.62-d_ 1-1-% kuit4,)
iir
Plcc --"17rc L4I7
;AL
---(R-bato76440,4-,
(F.
t
hge4ech
6411/14,
Approved For Release 2004/10/20 : CIA-RDP80601676R001400040006-9