PROPOSED PRIORITY CHANGES, ATTACHMENT TO DCID 1/2 (U)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP80M00165A001000020036-3
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 4
• Document Creation Date: December 20, 2016
• Document Release Date: November 24, 2006
• Sequence Number: 36
• Publication Date: October 3, 1977
• Content Type: MF

Approved For Release 20c1 0- lp RDP80MOO165AO01000020036-3
hO EaRE1SH DI3SE 4
NATIONAL FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE BOARD
NFIB-5..1/65
3CCT1977
Copy Jof 25
FROM: John N. McMahon
Acting Vice Chairman
SUBJECT: Proposed Priority Changes,
Attachment to DCID 1/2 (U)
REFERENCE: Attachment to DCID 1/2, "Current US
Foreign Intelligence Requirements
Categories and Priorities," NFIB-S.l/64
1 August 1977
1. (U) In accordance with procedures outlined in the
reference, the NIO for Conventional. Forces (NIO/CF) has
proposed priority changes within his area of cognizance,
as shown in Attachment 1.
2. (U) The DCID 1/2 Ad Hoc Group, having coordinated
these proposed changes with Community elements, and in
consultation with the NIO/CF, recommends they be adopted.
The impact of these changes on the overall distribution of
priorities is shown in Attachment 2. In addition to the
rationale provided for these changes, which is discussed
in the next paragraph, the DCID 1/2 Ad Hoc Group wishes
to emphasize the following points to the NFIB:
a. (U) These proposed changes demonstrate
the dynamics of a "current" priorities system, as
opposed to the previous system which forecast
priorities for a future time period. Thus, the
NIO/CF is drawing the attention of substantive
intelligence activities to certain realities and
standing requirements which affect the focus of
his task in today's world.
b. (U) The discipline of the DCID 1/2
priorities procedure is judgmental as opposed to
one in which changes are designed to balance out
to zero. Although all of the proposed changes
result in increased priorities, the impact upo
qes 1
the priorities distribution (as can be noted in
Attachment 2) is slight. Further assurance that
Et FIS clss~3
Approved For Release 2006/1 1/27 : UIA-RDP80M00165A001000020036-3.
 Approved For Release ~006/11/27: CIA=R'0AdO 65'AO~S1000020036-3
SUBJECT: PTt_ )se Priority Changes,
Attachment to DCID 1/2 (U)
the integrity of the process will be preserved is
provided for by the requirement for annual review
of all priorities. As occurred in the preparation
of the current document, the annual review will
adjust priorities both upward and downward. How-
ever, the resultant priorities distribution is
not balanced by a set of mathematical rules which
demand equivalent positive and negative actions.
3. (S) The broad rationale behind these specific
recommended priority changes supports the following issues:
4, (U) Please telephone or forward your approval/dis-
approval of the proposed priority changes to the NFIB Exe-
cutive Secretariat to arrive by 14 October 1977.
hn N, McMahon
Attachments
1, NIO Change Justification
2. Impact of Proposed Priority Changes
Approved For Release 2006/11/27: CI , $ MOE AA001,OOO420Q36-. ;
 Approved For Release 2006/11/27: CIA-RDP80M00165A001000020036-3
Approved For Release 2006/11/27: CIA-RDP80M00165A001000020036-3
 Approved For Release 2006/11/27: CIA-RDP80M00165A001000020036-3
TRANSMITTAL SLIP
DATE
TO:
ROOM NO.
BUILDING
REMARKS:
RIqt I f7
w 5
FROM: /CIE
J
ROOM NO.
ILDING
EXTENSION
F FORM NO- 1 REPLACES FORM 36-$ FEB T WHICH MAY BE USED.
Approved For Release 2006/11/27: CIA-RDP80M00165AO01000020036-3