POLYGRAPH TESTING

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80M00165A001200170003-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 21, 2006
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 3, 1977
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80M00165A001200170003-1.pdf68.97 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/11/21 : CIA-RDP80MOO165A001200170003- ?i~ MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director of Central Intelligence FROM: Director of Central Intelligence SUBJECT: Polygraph Testing 1. I have reviewed the package you sent me on the question of polygraph testing. I would appreciate the following backup information: a. Of the samples indicated, a large percentage of new applicants were rejected on the basis of poly- graph alone. Were the additional forms of investigation, such as interviews with friends, completed or was the applicant rejected on the basis of polygraph before the testing went forward? What did the polygraph show and how did we know it was a clear-cut case for rejection? STAT b. In the two test cases cited, what was the questioning like? What checks do we have to prevent the questionable and embarrassing interrogation tech- niques e. uestions on sexual behavior) that alleges were formerly used? 2. Would you give me a simple statement in layman's language summarizing the generally accepted view of the validity of polygraph techniques. What standards do the many agencies that use the polygraph use to measure the reliability of a polygrapty"test? STANSFIELD TURNER Admiral, U.S. Navy 1O..I/CD qe 11 Approved For Release 2006/11/21 : CIA-RDP80MOO165AO01200170003-1 ove saws eil~se 00 11r (y~PB~nor6~$Fi~~~p170003-1 EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT Routing Slip D/DCI/NI 12 Cor 15 INFO { DATE I INITIAL L. Lap X x cU "Y' y 4 March 1977 36:37 (7-76) Dare Approved For Release 2006/11/21 : CIA-_R?P80MQQ1.Q5AQQ12Q.0.170003-1