CONVERSATION WITH SECRETARY BROWN, 1 DECEMBER 1977

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80M00165A001900010005-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
5
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 13, 2004
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 2, 1977
Content Type: 
MFR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80M00165A001900010005-9.pdf171.89 KB
Body: 
Approved For Relea e2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP80M00165A00 0010005-9 . ME 1ORANrU FOR 'ME RECORD SUBJECT: Conversation with Secretary Brown, 1 December 1977 1.' Discussed PRM-23: a. There is considerable difference of opinion on the definition of national and tactical. Secretary Brown wants it based on the users and I'd like it based on the collectors. He feels that you can only decide which collector's budget to put a collection system in based on who's going to use it. I pointed out there was more than who was going to use it involved in where it went in the budget. There was also the factor of management and interplay with other systems. Essentially, there is a certain circularity to the argument but I still believe that only a collector's definition is practicable. We did agree that in the long run it was basically going to be a matter of case-by-case determination. b. The Secretary made reference to some exception I took in my letter to him on PRM1-23 about survivability (I'd forgotten what that was). He indicated he thought that that could be resolved. 2. FY 79 Budget: a. I assured Secretary Bra. that I would represent his views on if they weren't represented in the OAMIB write-ups. b. Because he has a "joint" review of his budget with OMB, he has agreement with OMB that their meeting with the President will not lead to any decisions. We ought to look into this. The decisions will be made at the meeting with SecDef present. c. I invited Secretary Brown to be present at my meeting with the President on the intelligence budget. I Copy Approved For Release 200410 ,IO :cJfR ]P M00165A00190001000 9 YEA ~'?-'' ' .! Approved For Relea "e 2004/05/05 CIA2RDP80M00165A000010005-9 d. We discussed the gI situation. I believe I'm 25X1 coming down to we're going to out; that we d to use them in a feeling that we may have to take a position that build five II that we are going to fly them on't want to specs y the interval; that we will try as s aria a manner as possible so as to have h left over when enoug becomes avai able and 0 is phased out 25X1 that we can keep as the emergency back-up until 25X1 such time as we deci e it is either too expensive to be worth doing or other back-ups are available. 3. Pending any move by State to try t I-OLIM-Ul L1115 iaC_CiVjry, Defense is putting very tight controls on the distribution We will still receive them, however. 4. Secretary Atherton at State has contacted General Fish at Defense with a request F_ I -Fnr hel 4 1 d4-- a- - - iin b, u p seekerheads from SA-7's in order to comply with this request . Ihey'd$ like to know if we have some available. I'd like to get an answer back to Secretary Brown on that very quickly. 5. DIA Building: Secretary Brown has received the second study (I presume the one I sent to him) and is reviewing it. In his words, the question of where it would be funded and where it would be located were both still up in the air. 6. Secretary Brown agreed that we should resist full funding for the NRO I have h _ d a - - - ' ` t e t ne 7 Secretary Brown suggested that in our briefings for Senator ,Nunn tomorrow that we inform him of the degree of information we have '_,on Soviet ground forces movements, e.g., the recent semi-annual rota- tion. Apparently, Senator Nunn is less optimistic that we will detect movements of their forces. 9. I delivered to Secretary Brown the paper on Soviet clandestine acquisition of technology. 10. I delivered to Secretary Brown and we discussed the concept of having a single point of contact for agreements with the Congress on exchange of information. His first point was that thetee maybe was 25X1 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP80M00165AO01900010005-9 r '.A+ ,qi' tar I -3- Approved For ReIeAY6 2004/05/05: CIA-RDP80M00165A0O'Tgt0010005-9. some value in having extra impedimenta and delay mechanisms to make sure we didn't go too far. He did agree with my concept that it was quite embarrassing to have either dilatory or contradictory responses as we do now. I made the point that my objective was not to override NSA and others but simply to arrange to work out the nature of the agreements inside the intelligence community and then go to the Congress with a united front. 12. Secretary Brown gave me a series of comments on the 0MB budget issues which had been developed by his staff. 25X1 25X1 -STANSFIELD TM ER `~- Director Approved For Releas$ 2004/05/05 CIA-RDP80 M 00165A001900010005-9 Approved For -Retease 2OO4/G5/O IAAR P80MOO OO4900.04QOO5-9 [ UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL SECRET EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT Routing Slip ACTION INFO DATE INITIAL 1 DCI X 2 ADDCI X 3 AD/DCI/ C X ras. 2 $ `1 D NFA 5 DDO 6 DDA 7 DDS&T 8 LC 9 DDCI C 10 11 12 DS X A5: CIA-RDP8O )Ojl 01O Date J acted) ? 40--,~2 xi 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP80M00165AO01900010005-9 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP80M00165AO01900010005-9