REVISED FIGURES FOR EP AND SUPERGRADE REQUIREMENTS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80M00772A000200020045-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
7
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 13, 2005
Sequence Number: 
45
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 12, 1978
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80M00772A000200020045-7.pdf189.91 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772A000200020045-7 Intelligence Community Staff 12 May 1978 DCI/jC 7 _ r ! MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. William G. Miller, Staff Director Senate Select Committee on Intelligence ATTENTION: Mr. Daniel A. Childs, Jr. Deputy to the DCI for Resource Management SUBJECT: Revised Figures for EP and Supergrade Requirements 1. Attached herewith are revised data reflecting changes in the EP and Supergrade requirements for the Resource Management Staff and the Collection Tasking Staff. This data replaces the original submission forwarded to you under a covering letter signed by Admiral Turner dated 3 May 1978, and the supplemental justifi- cation which I submitted to you on 5 May by memorandum. 2. The effect of this revision is to decrease the grade level for Office Directors with a concomitant downgrading of other appro- priate positions. This action reduces the overall EP and Supergrade requirements for both Staffs. Attachment As Stated Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M007 :. riot Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772 ------ j LJ $ ? , 1 The Director of Central Intelligence 'C! f ~' 2.1' Washington, D.C. 20505 --- Intelligence Community Staff 12 May 1978 MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Thomas K. Latimer, Staff Director House Permanent Select Committee (Intelligence) Deputy to -the DC1 or Resource Management SUBJECT: Revised Figures for EP and Supergrade Requirements 1. Attached herewith are revised data reflecting changes in the EP and Supergrade requirements for the Resource Management Staff and the Collection Tasking Staff. This data replaces the original submission forwarded to you under a covering letter signed by Admiral Turner dated 3 May 1978, and the supplemental justification which I submitted to you on 5 May by memorandum. 2. The effect of this revision is to decrease the grade level for Office Directors with a concomitant downgrading of other appropriate positions. This action reduces the overall EP and Supergrade requirements for both Staffs. Attachment As Stated SECRET Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80MOO772AO00200020045-17 ? Approved For Release 2006/101 : a - DP80M00772AO00200020045-7 The Director of Central Intelligence Washington, D.C. 20505 Intelligence Community Staff 12 May 1978 MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Samuel Ralph Preston Senior Staff Assistant House Appropriations Committee ATTENTION: Mr. Charles W. Snodgrass Deputy to the tor esource Management SUBJECT: Revised Figures for EP and Supergrade Requirements 1. Attached herewith are revised data reflecting changes in the EP and Supergrade requirements for the Resource Management Staff and the Collection Tasking Staff. This data replaces the original submission forwarded to you under a covering letter signed by Admiral Turner dated 3 May 1978, and the supplemental jusitification which I submitted to you on 5 May by memorandum. 2. The effect of this revision is to decrease the grade level for Office Directors with a concomitant downgrading of other appropriate positions. This action reduces the overall EP and Supergrade requirements for both Staffs. Attachment: As Stated OCi/C :.7_ o vtL Approved For Release 2006/10/1.9: CIA-RDP80MOO772AO00200020045-7 Approved For Release 2006/1 0/'4-: ~- DP80M00772A000200020045-7 The Director of Central Intelligence Washington, D.C. 20505 Intelligence Community Staff DWW/IC 2 - y - y L/6 /. ,. I 12 May 1978 MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Guy G. McConnell Clerk, Defense Subcommittee Senate Appropriations Committee ATTENTION: Mr. James A. Fellenbaum Deputy to the or Resource Management --- SUBJECT: Revised Figures for EP and Supergrade Requirements 1. Attached herewith are revised data reflecting changes in the EP and Supergrade requirements for the Resource Management Staff and the Collection Tasking Staff. This data replaces the original submission forwarded to you under a covering letter signed by Admiral Turner dated 3 May 1978, and the supplemental justification which I submitted to you on 5 May by memorandum. 2. The effect of this revision is to decrease the grade level for Office Directors with a concomitant downgrading of other appropriate positions. This action reduces the overall EP and Supergrade requirements for both Staffs. Attachments As Stated Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772A000200020045-7 Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772A000200020045-7 Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772A000200020045-7 9c,c.sc..._ Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772AO00200020045-7 MAY 11, 1978 NOTE FOR: FROM: At the NFIB meeting yesterday, Foster Collins asked me if we couldn't do something to make sure that Turner's statements to the Congress are distributed to the NFIP program managers. I didn't realize that this was not being done. Can you think for a little bit on what would be required to make sure that they get copies of whatever statements Turner might make to the Congress that would be relevant? Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772AO00200020045-7 Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772AO00200020045-7 MEMORANDUM OF CONVERSATION WITH BOB ROSENBERG May 9, 1978 Bob suggests that we send a paper to Dave Aaron on the subject of sparating discussion of the NFIP and non-NFIP DoD budgets. I won't be able'-to get on Aaron's calendar unless such a memo is forthcoming. He thinks it would be a good idea to formally submit a rebuttal or counterview to the President 24 to 48 hours in advance of the OMB Spring Review. The timing is important, because it needs to be sub- mitted close enough to the deadline that extensive staffing around EOB is not possible. He proposed that the PRC(I) views would carry a lot of weight. I backed him off of that some but said that I would raise the question with Turner. I was skeptical that the organization as a whole would be predictable enough to be really useful.