REVISED FIGURES FOR EP AND SUPERGRADE REQUIREMENTS

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP80M00772A000200020045-7
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 7
• Document Creation Date: December 19, 2016
• Document Release Date: July 13, 2005
• Sequence Number: 45
• Publication Date: May 12, 1978
• Content Type: MF

Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772A000200020045-7
Intelligence Community Staff
12 May 1978
DCI/jC 7 _ r !
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. William G. Miller, Staff Director
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
ATTENTION: Mr. Daniel A. Childs, Jr.
Deputy to the DCI for Resource Management
SUBJECT: Revised Figures for EP and Supergrade
Requirements
1. Attached herewith are revised data reflecting changes in
the EP and Supergrade requirements for the Resource Management
Staff and the Collection Tasking Staff. This data replaces the
original submission forwarded to you under a covering letter signed
by Admiral Turner dated 3 May 1978, and the supplemental justifi-
cation which I submitted to you on 5 May by memorandum.
2. The effect of this revision is to decrease the grade level
for Office Directors with a concomitant downgrading of other appro-
priate positions. This action reduces the overall EP and Supergrade
requirements for both Staffs.
Attachment
As Stated
Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M007
 :. riot
Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772 ------ j
LJ $ ? , 1
The Director of Central Intelligence 'C! f ~' 2.1'
Washington, D.C. 20505 ---
Intelligence Community Staff
12 May 1978
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Thomas K. Latimer, Staff Director
House Permanent Select Committee (Intelligence)
Deputy to -the DC1 or Resource Management
SUBJECT: Revised Figures for EP and Supergrade
Requirements
1. Attached herewith are revised data reflecting changes
in the EP and Supergrade requirements for the Resource Management
Staff and the Collection Tasking Staff. This data replaces the
original submission forwarded to you under a covering letter
signed by Admiral Turner dated 3 May 1978, and the supplemental
justification which I submitted to you on 5 May by memorandum.
2. The effect of this revision is to decrease the grade
level for Office Directors with a concomitant downgrading of other
appropriate positions. This action reduces the overall EP and
Supergrade requirements for both Staffs.
Attachment
As Stated
SECRET
Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80MOO772AO00200020045-17
 ? Approved For Release 2006/101 : a - DP80M00772AO00200020045-7
The Director of Central Intelligence
Washington, D.C. 20505
Intelligence Community Staff
12 May 1978
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Samuel Ralph Preston
Senior Staff Assistant
House Appropriations Committee
ATTENTION: Mr. Charles W. Snodgrass
Deputy to the tor esource Management
SUBJECT: Revised Figures for EP and Supergrade
Requirements
1. Attached herewith are revised data reflecting changes
in the EP and Supergrade requirements for the Resource Management
Staff and the Collection Tasking Staff. This data replaces the
original submission forwarded to you under a covering letter
signed by Admiral Turner dated 3 May 1978, and the supplemental
jusitification which I submitted to you on 5 May by memorandum.
2. The effect of this revision is to decrease the grade
level for Office Directors with a concomitant downgrading of other
appropriate positions. This action reduces the overall EP and
Supergrade requirements for both Staffs.
Attachment:
As Stated
OCi/C :.7_ o vtL
Approved For Release 2006/10/1.9: CIA-RDP80MOO772AO00200020045-7
 Approved For Release 2006/1 0/'4-: ~- DP80M00772A000200020045-7
The Director of Central Intelligence
Washington, D.C. 20505
Intelligence Community Staff
DWW/IC 2 - y - y L/6 /. ,. I
12 May 1978
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Guy G. McConnell
Clerk, Defense Subcommittee
Senate Appropriations Committee
ATTENTION: Mr. James A. Fellenbaum
Deputy to the or Resource Management
---
SUBJECT: Revised Figures for EP and Supergrade
Requirements
1. Attached herewith are revised data reflecting changes
in the EP and Supergrade requirements for the Resource Management
Staff and the Collection Tasking Staff. This data replaces the
original submission forwarded to you under a covering letter
signed by Admiral Turner dated 3 May 1978, and the supplemental
justification which I submitted to you on 5 May by memorandum.
2. The effect of this revision is to decrease the grade
level for Office Directors with a concomitant downgrading of other
appropriate positions. This action reduces the overall EP and
Supergrade requirements for both Staffs.
Attachments
As Stated
Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772A000200020045-7
 Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772A000200020045-7
Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772A000200020045-7
 9c,c.sc..._
Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772AO00200020045-7
MAY 11, 1978
NOTE FOR:
FROM:
At the NFIB meeting yesterday, Foster Collins asked me if we
couldn't do something to make sure that Turner's statements to the
Congress are distributed to the NFIP program managers. I didn't realize
that this was not being done. Can you think for a little bit on what
would be required to make sure that they get copies of whatever
statements Turner might make to the Congress that would be relevant?
Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772AO00200020045-7
 Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80M00772AO00200020045-7
MEMORANDUM OF CONVERSATION
WITH BOB ROSENBERG
May 9, 1978
Bob suggests that we send a paper to Dave Aaron on the subject
of sparating discussion of the NFIP and non-NFIP DoD budgets. I won't
be able'-to get on Aaron's calendar unless such a memo is forthcoming.
He thinks it would be a good idea to formally submit a rebuttal
or counterview to the President 24 to 48 hours in advance of the OMB
Spring Review. The timing is important, because it needs to be sub-
mitted close enough to the deadline that extensive staffing around EOB
is not possible.
He proposed that the PRC(I) views would carry a lot of weight.
I backed him off of that some but said that I would raise the question
with Turner. I was skeptical that the organization as a whole would
be predictable enough to be really useful.