COMMUNITY REACTION TO THE STRATEGIC WARNING STAFF'S FIRST MONTHLY REPORT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80M01133A000800050005-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
7
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 18, 2004
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 15, 1975
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80M01133A000800050005-1.pdf198.79 KB
Body: 
x 1; q ,~, Approved For Release 2004/10/28: CIA-RDP80M01133AO MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence SUBJECT: Community Reaction to the Strategic Warning Staff's First Monthly Report 1. Informal reaction of NSA, DIA, INR, and OCI to the SWS's first Monthly Report was generally favorable. NSA and INR were pleasantly surprised to note that the SWS appeared to be interpreting its charter rather broadly, i.e., covering some topics that some elements of the community would consider as falling within the small-w area. In spite of bias in favor of the broad interpretation, INR wondered whether the Monthly Report had not gone too far into the small-w area. 2. DIA also thought it was a good effort but hoped that "subsequent issues will result in less items of a current intelligence /background nature. " 3. The OCI consensus was that the Monthly Report "... by and large covers the areas it is supposed to cover... " and "... is an improvement over the old weekly Watch Report. " They noted, hovr- ever, that "... the report does step a bit beyond its charter in some instances.... " (Dick Lehman said that Ed Proctor might have other views to offer later. ) 4. Our own view is that the SWS has gone considerably beyond its charter as defined in DCID 1/5. * The items on Brezhnev's health, for example, appear to us to have no perceivable relationship to the possible resort by the Soviets to military action and thus fall outside the big-W area. *Paragraph 2, "Definition, " of DCID 1/5: "Strategic warning is defined as the earliest possible warning that the Soviet Union, the Warsaw Pact, the PRC, or North Korea is considering military action by its armed forces beyond its borders, or is employing its military capabilities beyond its borders in ways that might threaten military confrontation with the U. S. " Approved For Release 2004/1~0~/28 : CIA-RDP80~jX-1, ; A40p89 25X1 I IDLNT AL C ~~~ Approved For Release 2004/10/28 : CIA-RDP80M01133A000800050005-1 5. There is clearly no way of defining exactly what international issues the SWS should and should not address. And general discussion of the problem.-as we discovered in the meetings of the Ad Hoc Con- mittee-.?is unlikely to lead to its resolution. We believe, however, that steady pressure should be maintained on the SWS to refine the focus of its publications. This can probably best be accomplished by urging the SWS to indicate more explicitly than they have done in the Monthly Report the relevance of each of its articles to the subject of strategic warning. 6. Attached is a proposed letter from you to General Faurer on this subject. 25X1 ue . Wilson Lie enant General, USA D/DCI/IC Attachment: Letter to Gen. Faurer Distribution: Orig - DCI I..DDCI 1 -ER D/DCI/IC (V- IC Registry 25X11 1