REVISION OF PSB D-23

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80R01731R000700450029-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
44
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 18, 2006
Sequence Number: 
29
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 28, 1953
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80R01731R000700450029-9.pdf2.22 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP..80R01731 R000700450029-9 SECURITY INFORMATION TOP SECRET PSYCHOLOGICAL STRATEGY BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C. COPY NO. E- July 28, 1953 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PSYCHOLOGICAL STRATEGY BOARD SUBJECT: Revision of PSB D-23. In reference to my memorandum of July 27, 1953, I am now transmitting a copy of the revision of PSB D-23, July 24, 195113, COPY NO. ~i, prepared in the Department of State, together with a copy of Stategs summary. In addition, there are enclosed, for reference: 1. Copy of my memorandum of July 27, COPY NU. 2. Copy of State Department memorandum in connection with State Department proposed draft of PSB D-23 (undated); 3. Copy of memorandum to Mr. Bonsai, PSA, from Ambassador Stanton, dated July 16, 1953. George A, Morgan Acting Director MQRI/DF Pages 1-41 and 43 SECURITY INFORMATION TOP SECRE` 1 of 1Paga DOCUMENT NO, , q NO CHANGE IN CLASS 8 Ca 9 (1 8 flE it I mSSIFIED Li CLASS. CH ! (KI) TO NEXT REVI,VI UATE AUTHi HR ~i? DATE 2 ~1~ RZVIEWERI 018373 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80R01731 R000700450029-9 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CI6-RDP80R01731 R000700450029-9 Copy. No 52 SECURITY flFOR`IATION TOP SECRET PSYCHOLOGICAL STRATEGY BOARD WASHIl'1GT ON 25, D. C. July. 27, 1953 14EHORANDTJM TO: Psychological Strata Mr Board SUBJECT: Revision of PSB D-23 A revision of PSB D-23, prepared in the Department of State as noted at the last Board meeting, will be circulated as soon as it can be mimeographed. At the request of the State Departrient a statenent setting forth the considerations that led to the revision, together with copies of a memorandwi by the United States Ambassador to Thailand,, are circulated herewith. Since tSB D-23 is still before the 1SC, I hope the Board will consider at least the central issues raised by the pro- posed revision at its rlceting on July 29. To help define those issues, I would like to corrient as follows: 1. N`1SC action No. 788 b directed ~'SB to prepare a plan for "coordinated psychological operations based on Thailand." If Phase II of P D- i e e e e b me zro 1;,. a posed change with the NSC. Thus one question is bow to handle the pro- 2. Phase II in PSB D-23 is not laid down as a final decision to act but indicated as a direction for contingency planning and preparation "for utilization of Thailand as a base - when and if conditions permit" Para 3, p. 34). Several of the State coru:ients seem to ignore this dis- tinction. Thus with regard to acceptability to the Thai Governrient and effects on relations with other Asians and Allies, there is no question of proposing Phase II to any of tho..zuntil conditions have evolved further along lines indicated in PSB D-23. Also with regard to cormiitmcnt of non-native forces, the State cornent tares no account of the possibility that national policy with regard to VPC may be implemented by the time Phase II is reached. Hence the issue that concerns PSB D-2~ is not whether Phase II rial;es sense under resent cireurastanees but whether it should be adoted as a basis for ettin ready -to rioet probable future circums ances. 3. That Southeast Asia is not a political unity is obvious, but this does not exclude important parts of it from becoming more unified for certain purposes when and if the communist threat spreads and the U,S. injects its partnership as a basis of fresh confidence. Here again, the issue is not the present but the future. If we not onLad ?j- t actual dividedness of the area but insist on thin7:inn in no other terms 'ox dater on we - ` n o an o - cor .lunist iv siye~~ra ~ It is not a question of a ` o II g a 'ja uni ,~ I ase II. The i a, would be to radiate moral as well as material strenth outward frpm the Thai base as far and fast as it will go. SECTMITT INFORt IATIQN Page # TOP SECRET of 2 pages 89008 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80R01731 R000700450029-9 Approved For -Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80RO1731 R000700450029-9 Nap" W SECURITY MITFORMIATION TOP SECRET I+. In respect to the Ambassador's torrent on economic aid it should be noted (Para (5) p. 30) that the main recomncndation is for maintenance of economic aid and technical assistance programs "at least at the present scale", in order to avoid the obvious contradictions resulting from any decrease in such programs. It is also intended (para (5) (c) p. 30) specifically to aid in development of Northeastern Thailand, a point mentioned as desirable in the Ambassador's r.lemoraridtui.' 5. PSB D--23 does not connit us to any fixed view of prospects in Indochina (para 2, p. 25, pLza 6, p,26). If the main free--world effort remains there, it is still impC'zttant to strengthen the Thai flan l-.. George A. Horgan Acting Director SECURITY =01O U IATION Page 2 TOP SECRET of 2 pages 89908 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80R01731 R000700450029-9 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80RO1731 R000700450029-9 ti TOR ST CRET - SECURITY INFORMATION DEPARTMENT W0POSED DRAFT OF FSB D-23 The State Department proposed draft of PSB D-23 is based on the Department's objections to Phase II of PSB D-23 and upon a memorandum from Ambassador Edwin F. Stanton, copy attached, which strongly supported the Department's object:tons and provided additional informa- tion and reason. TOP SECS' ,T__::_SECURITY INFORMATION ''908 ~J V Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80R01731R000700450029-9 Approved For Relea r - '' ' .ut : h P M700450029-9 July 16, 1953 PSA - Mr. Bonsai PSA - Edwin F. Stanton PS1 D-23. "U.S. Psychological Strategy with Respect to the Thai Peoples of Southeast Asia.fi Having perused the above mentioned paper, I would endorse "Phase I", which proposes in coordination with U.S. military programs, to consolidate Thailand as a secure base, by increasing its strength and making its frontiers more defensible. This, in essence, is what the U.S. Government has been doing in Thailand during the past two and one-half years throi)LYh the extension of military and economic assistance to Thailand] 5x1 With respect to a military assistance program, I believe that the Thai economy and finances will not support any great increase in the military aid which has been planned and which is now in process of being implemented. Every effort should be made, however, to expedite shipment of military equipment which has been programmed, par- ticularly artillery, and to assign without delay the additional personnel requested by MAAG, Thailand, in order to expedite the training of the Thai Armed Forces. The assistance being extended by our Government to the Thai Police should not be overlooked. To meet the threat to Thailand's frontiers occasioned by the Communist invasion of Laos, the strength of the Thai Police is being increased by some 5,000 men 2X1 r i '~ X1 Cith ro pect to our economic aid, I feel, on the basis of con- versations with the Prime Minister, the Foreign Minister, and other members of the Cabinet, that the Thai Government does not desire any great increase over and above the level of aid which has been extended during the past two years. In fact, the Thai Government finds the setting aside of counterpart funds a very considerable burden and is an obligation which it would like our Government to waive. I believe, therefore, that it would not be advisable to increase economic aid except for such emergency projects in north- eastern Thailand as may be agreed upon. It should be borne in mind that the economic assistance which we have extended to Thailand is not of such a nature as materially to lessen the financial burdens incurred by the Thai Government in connection with expenditures for military purposes. The only exception to the foregoing is the assistance which M.A can give viith respect to highways. aggression or Communist blandishments has been stimulated. home to the Thai people and their will to resist either Communist The psychological objectives listed under "Phase I" have also received a .groat deal of attention and through information programs, the dangers of Communism have been brought 25x1 accomplished by the extension of informational activities to the provinces, However, this can only be achieved through an increase of personnel, preferably personnel having at least a basic knowledge of the Thai language, and through increased appropriations. With rogard,9908 TOPSECU_ T - CUR ITY INFORMATION Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-R?P80R01731R000700450029-9 Approved For R6M@g=/1.2 Z T QI R000700450029-9 89908 Approved For R - ~FCTiT?TT.Y TNF'I~TiM4TTnf~ Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80R01731 RoOf-O 1Q -9tate Draf t July 21?, 1953 T CUP Ty Ii 07 ' 7 TION TOP SFC .T SUi.F `PRY OF' idsT'TT ENT 0' TATS P.1,VTSIOT~' OF PS " , . T 7 CT TO TIC U. yCIIOLOGICL TIL . CY j'TTFI I TIM '0 I,; S OF SOUT i~ T A It~ I. P Iision To determine the psychological implications and consequences of cowunist strategy in Southeast Lsia, ,:~nd to establish a sound U. S. psychological strategy in the area with respect to the Thai peoples of Southeast Asia, II. Conclusions 1. That communist expansionist activity in Southeast Asia is growing in strength and potency. Developments in comnuni.st str a.te;ry in the Thai ethnic area pose an imminent threat to Thailand, which rust be met rapidly with an effective political-psychological military counter e;f:i ort, or Southeast tsia could fall to the communists without overt intervention by the Chi;ese Communist awned forces. 2, That Thai1 .nd is politicallly and f~eogra'Dhicr:lly the most suitable Thai ethnic base in which to initiate and develop a -ubstantial counter effort. That Thailand's economy, basically a,ricultural, is t present strained Iy measures necessary for the national security. This situation, occurring at a time ',rYien i.nere-sad communist pressure is imrc.nent, calls for economic id nrogra.ms at the levels of the severa,l years past at lei st, SEC,iUR.T.TY I'i' Or:':LTION 1 TQ' 'Ci ET of 4 pages Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80R01731 8000700450029-9 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80R01731 R000700450029-9 v Summary Draft SECURITY ?tATION July 24, 1953 TOP SECRET to support beneficial long-range projects, and to reduce the danger of dissidence in the Northeast. 4. That the ethnic bo rds of the Thai peoples scattered through Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Southern China can ccn:tribuite.to the psychological and military effort to prevent communist expansion. 5. That U. S. support end activation of a Thailand-based counter effort must utilize and exploit fully the normal channels of contact with native elements by placing highly qualified individuals in important posts in Thailand and utilizing every phase and form of psychological warfare to prepare the minds and emotions of -the people to collaborate in the effort; that this sup-ort ~-iust relate to sync'ironize efforts including extensive para,a ili_tary operations. 6. That a coordinated politico.l effort to bring French policy towards Indochina more in accord with the realities of the situation '~ust be con- sidered a major f.,ctor in the overall effectiveness of the resistance effort based in Thailand while expanded 17. S. progr~is for strengthening Thailand could assist in Making this effort more effective. 7. That the prom,osed expansion of U. S, activities based on Thailand is feasible in the light of that country's capabilities, providing emphasis is placed initially or reducing Thailand's vulnerabilities. Consequently, progrr. ms sh'.uld be aimed at strengthening Thailand ' s ability to resist communist aggression or subversion, with only such necessary supporting programs in the inform~:mation field in adjacent areas as are consistent with the existing patterns of inter-Allied relationships. SECUE.- TY INI OR'', TION 2 .TOP SE,EI T of 4 pages 83008 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80R01731 R000700450029-9 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80ROl731 R000700450029-9 Summary Draft SECURITY IT'S Om 1TION July 24, 1953 TOP SECRET III. Proosed chologica.l Strategy Plan 1. In coordination with U. S. military programs, consolid,.te Thailand as a secure base, by increasing its strength C-,nd ni king its frontiers more defensible. a. Pa;rchal. 291-2 I- Ob ootives (1) Stimulate, crystallize, maintain, and coordinate the active resistance in Thailcnd to coi?nunist aggression, subversion, and oppression, (2) ' Thr"7ur hout ll of Southeast Asia maximize the favorable aspects, and minimize any unfavorable aspect, of U.S. support to Thailand. (3) Encouraf;e and strengthen all feasii?le cooperation among the countries of Southeast ..sia -ith each other and with the British and French, and of both the farmer and the latter with the U.S. b. Basic Tasks (1) lTherever possible in cooperation with the Thai Government and raking use chiefly of indigenous outlets, develop or expand U.S. overt information programs directed to Southeast Asia, with initial emphasis on those aimed at Thailand and other Thai ethnic groups. (2) Stimulate and sup-)ort effective overt and covert informa- tion activities of tho Thai Government in stir; -art of objectives 25X1 compatible with National Policy. (3) Develop, expand, or intensify U.S. activities in support of all of the objectives in National Policy. SECLWT^'y. IYFOI E~_ TION 3 srcr "T of 4 pages B9908 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80R01731R000700450029-9 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80R017N311 R000700450029-9 `, SSE ITY ITTFOI?,'TIOIT Summary Draft TOP SECRET July 24, 1953 (4) Develop, expand, and accelerate to the greatest extent sound progrars for the creation and employment of :indigenous guerrilla and Para-military forces capable of effecti'.-e active defense against communist inva ion and infiltration of Thailand.' (5) 'V1intain at least at the present scale, and possibly increase beyond the FY '52 and FY 153 level, the economic aid and technical assistance program. (6) ?trengthen and make obligatory educational courses for all official U.S. personnel, designed to give them a background of the history, culture and languages within which they will work in Southeast Asia, particularly Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia. (7) Strengthen orientation projr--ms for indigenous military personnel, and suitable information programs for the general public, taking; into account local cultural attitudes. (8) Tactfully, and on a realistic basis, induce the Thai Government to carry out measuros intended to reduce Thai vulnerabilities to communist subversion. 4 SECURITY Il` ORI"TION of 4 pages ..TOP ECPET 89008 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80R01731 8000700450029-9 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80R01731 R000700450029-9 U iLt`~ I:, SECURITY INFORMATION TOP SECRET July 24, 1953 PROPOSED REVISION BY DEPARTMENT OF STATE PSB D-23 U. SPSYCHOLOGICAL STRATEGY WITH RESPECT TO THE THAI PEOPLES OF SOUTFIEAST ASIA I. MISSION To determine the psychological implications and consequences of communist strategy-in Southeast Asia, and to establish a sound U.S. psychological strategy in the area with respect to the Thai peoples of Southeast Asia. II, ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEM 1. Analysis of C mmunist Strate at Evolution of communist strategy in Southeast Asia since the beginning of 1953 has introduced e. new and dangerous element into the chronic problems of this unsettled area. From a long-term viewpoint a particularly significant development has been the setting up in January 1953 of a "Thai Autonomous Area" in a portion of Yunnan Province, roughly half the population of which is Thai This move almost certainly indicates on the part of communist strategists an intent to manipulate and subvert -- and perhaps a hope ultimately to dominate -- all of the Thai peoples. There are approximately 35,000,000 human beings of Thai or closely related ethnic origin -- including nearly 20,000,000 in Thai- land itself -- scattered throughout Southeast Asia, with strategically significant concentrations of them in Indochina, Burma, and China, as well as Thailand. The pattern of ethnic distribution is such that if the communist Pan-Thai strategy were successful the communist forces could easily turn the French position in Vietnam, and from Thailand as central base, attack either Bruma or Vietnam from the rear, while SECURITY INFORMATION 1 TOP CRET of 33 pages 52 83308 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80RO1731 R000700450029-9 ,Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80R01731 R000700450029-9 SECURITY_ INFORMATION TAP SSECRET serwously threatening the British position in Malaya. Apart from the possibilities of large-scale military action, the new communist strategy could achieve success more gradually by a steady infiltration and subver- sion of all the Thai territories, accompanied by guerrilla raids and political pressures aimed at undermining the free governments in Thailand.. Laos and Cambodia. This is probably the most dangerous aspect of the strategy. b. The Vietminh invasion of Laos graphically illustrates the threat in Southeast Asia. Regardless of the immediate military outcome in Laos, the communist forces there have achieved some important results. The most significant one Is to have established in Laos e. base for further rn&litaryy para.-military, and subversive attacks. Another valuable result, from the communist point of view, is to have demonstrated, both to the native populations and to the French, an inherent weakness of the French defensive position in Indochina, namely that while the French can successfully defend any chosen position, they have difficulty in depriving their adversaries of the initiativeo Even if the Vietminh forces withdraw completely from Laos, they have demonstrated how easily they cap enter it at will, and in setting up a "Free Laos" govern- ment they have signified an intention to expand or resume the invasion later. as The immediacy of the threat to Thailand depends in part on the degree of military and political success achieved by the Vietminh in Laos, but even if the border areas of the neighboring state are effectively cleared of communist influence, it remains serious. For the time being it is largely psycho-political, and still in the probing stage. It will SECURITY INFORMATION TOP SECRET 2 of 33 pages 88308 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80R01731 R000700450029-9 Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP80RO1731 R000700450029-9 SECURITY INFORMATION TOP SECRET recede only slightly as communist power withdraws from its border, and increase very sharply as it returns again. The threat will grow in pro- portion to inability of French Union forces to cope with it successfully, and if the Vietminh in any future military action is able to create a sufficiently strong impression of irresistible surge, of "invincibility", many influential Thai will be tempted to seek some accommodation with the enemy. The danger that the communists may subvert non-communist opposition elements and ambitious careerists in Thailand is particularly grave if -- as some reports suggest -, the exiled leader of the opposition, Fridi Phanomyong, is now living in Communist China and collaborating with the "Free Thai" leaders. The internal situation in Thailand is further aggravated by the presence of a strong communist movement in Thailand's large Chinese community, d. In summary, it seems evident that the flexible, many-sided but coherent communist strategy represents a very serious threat to the tribes and nations of the Thai ethnic group, including Laos and Cambodia, which occupy the heartland of Southeast Asia. This threat would be re