RAND REPORT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80R01731R003300180039-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
5
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 12, 2003
Sequence Number: 
39
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 29, 1952
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80R01731R003300180039-9.pdf190.76 KB
Body: 
Approved For Re4sese 2003/05/23SEcIR P80R01731 Rf 3300180039-9 Security Information 29 July 1952 SUBJECT : Rand Report 1. To arrive at an opinion as to the desirability of launching a I satellite vehicle for reconnaissance as proposed in the Rand Report involves three basic considerations: a. Feasibility. b. Estimate of effort required. c. Value of benefits. 5. The benefits to be derived from the existence of a number of satellites giving us pictures of the order of resolution of 100 ft. is largely a matter of speculation. It will give us some weather information and some area intelligence which is somewhat beyond our province to evaluate, but we wish to point out that better reconnaissance and better SECRET Approved For Release 2003305/.3 I44-F P80R01731 R003300180039-9 ecuri y n 2. Since all three of these considerations are, at this stage, matters of opinion, we have obtained the opinions of a group of lead- ing scientists and engineers to supplement our own findings. This group includes DuBridge, Bacher, Lauritsen, Greenstein, Killian, Hall, Watson, Zacharias and Wiezner. 3. All concerned agree that it is possible and feasible to construct a rocket to be propelled at sufficient speed to place it in a suitable orbit around the earth with the development of existing knowledge. Likewise, all agree that it is feasible to equip the rocket with power plant, control, television, etc. by development of existing knowledge. There is definitely a question, however, as to the possibility of ever being able to obtain recognizable images of objects of a size less than 100 ft. at the proposed orbit distance of say 350 miles. 4. Although such a rocket and its equipment are considered to be feasible, the task of bringing it into being should not be under-rated. It would require a major effort, we estimate, of 6 to 8 years in time and between a half and a billion dollars of 1952 dollars, with corre- sponding absorption of critical technical manpower. Approved For Relmse 2003/05/23 : 55 80R01731 R0 300180039-9 Security Information information could be obtained with far less effort and cost by, for in- stance, high flying jets (flight at 50, 000 ft. altitudes is now possible and at such altitudes, detection is very unlikely). 6. We realize that it can be argued that over-flying a nation is a breach of neutrality, on the other hand, the launching of a satellite which will some day come back to earth in anybody's country may be considered to be a breach of international law- -at any rate, it may be ammunition for propaganda. 7. We have no way of evaluating psychological value or effects, and must leave this phase to others. We do believe, however, that the Agency should give consideration now to this aspect of the project to be prepared for future developments. 8. Based on our knowledge and experience, we do not recommend the project be started at this time, but believe study should continue, especially along the lines which will be useful in general rocket motor development and instrumentation. 9. It is our present understanding that the Air Force has not abandoned the project, and there seems to be no call for this Agency to carry the project. /I 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/05/2& P80R01731 R003300180039-9 Security Information Approved For Release 2003/05/23 : CIA-RDP80R01731 R003300180039-9 DDI' 'OUTING No. L Mr. Becker Mr. Drain Mr. Davidson Mrs. Johnson Mr. Hassell 6 Approved For Release 2003/05/23 : CIA-RDP80R01731 R003300180039-9 Appaay~vr RelemvtQ3/5 2~olyQbtNNR,CI!P80RQp'f R003 ! (FENDER WILL CIRCLE CLA SIFICATION TOP AND BOTTOM) CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP Frn e- EL.-2115Z TO INI TIALS DATE I 14'~ 2 li w 3 4 rife 5 Q c/ c. FROM DATE I . 3 APPROVAL EUo FORMATION [j SIGNATURE ACTION DIRECT REPLY RETURN COMMENT PREPARATION OF REPLY DISPATCH FICONCURRENCE RECOMMENDATION FILE REMARKS: f ? App gd For ~A?003/05WRI ~1-RDP$ Q;II aR003 0180039-9 00180039-9 25X1 16-83794-1 U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE FORM 30-4 SEP. 1947 25X1 SECRET pproved or Rase 2003/05/23 : - - ROUTING AND RECORD S' ET INSTRUCTIONS: Officer designations should be used in the "TO" column. Under each comment a line should be drawn across sheet and each comment numbered to correspond with the number in the "TO" column. Each officer should initial (check mark insufficient) before further routing. This Routing and Record Sheet should be returned to Registry. FROM: NO . I Er~ -3-1"3?15 OTS/DD/P - 2-c-71 Quarters I D A JUL IL. 291952 TO ROOM DATE OFFICER'S NO. RECD FWD'D INITIALS COMMENTS 1. 226 '3V Mr. Wisner Admin. DDCI: 25 2. Pyrsuant to your suggestion , Admiral . and Dr. have e into the question of the feasibility 3. and effectiveness of a satellite of a satellite vehicle. You recall that this was a point raised by certain members a. of the PSB staff in the form of a recommendation that this government should devote the necessary priority 5. to such a project. In tcourse of the their in airy, Admiral a Dr. II talked to individ the 6. mentioned in the second paragraph, who are believed to be the most knowl edgeable American scientists in the 7. field. This list includes top-rankin scientists from Cal Tech and MIT, a s well as the Office of Naval Research , 8. etc. Dr. DuBridge is a Director O5 the Rand Corporation. 9. The conclusions of Admiral and Dr. 0 are set forth In VM' attached memorandum and are in gener 10. - - , ti 0 quite nega ve.. Admiral enlarged upon the contents of para. 7 stating that in his opinion the adver 11. ------ psychological effect would possibly outweigh the favorable effect. Host propaganda would certainly seize u on - p 12. any such effort as this on our part a a further act of American aggressiv and intimidation Mr Palmer Putnam 13. . L. the P$B maintai of ns r 9 o this argument. 14. S :J WqGNr I ING F ~. 51-1oApproved For Release 2003/05/23 S fDP80RO1731 R00330~19-9r S. EM AL ? 1 1 1 , e e ss 0