THE POLITICS OF AYATOLLAH RUHOLLAH KHOMEINI

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
14
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 1, 2004
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 20, 1978
Content Type: 
IM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9.pdf582.19 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A00050 2-9 SECRET CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY National Foreign Assessment Center THE POLITICS OF AYATOLLAH RUHOLLAH KHOMEINI KEY' POINTS --Ayatollah Khomeini has long been the central figure in the conservative Shia clerical opposition to the Shah. His influence is now so strong. that neither other clerics nor civilian opposition .leaders will take actions he opposes. --Khomeini is determined to overthrow the Shah -and is unlikely to accept any compromise. He considers. the Pahlavi regime to be corrupt, anti-Islamic and con- trolled by the US. --Khomeini's power base is composed of the Shia clergy, bazaar merchants, the urban lower classes and students. Senior military officers generally oppose and feel threatened by Khomeini, but junior officers-and enlisted men presumably are more responsive to his Shia message. 25X1 --Khomeini is anti-communist but his following may be susceptible. to communist .and radical penetration. He has cooperated in the past with an Islamic terrorist. group in Iran. 25X1 This memorandum was coordinated within the Central Intelligence Agency. Comments and ueries are tueZeome and may be addressed to the author, Iran AnaZytzeaZ Center 0 flee of Reg2onaZ and Political Analysis; (Phone: with support from the Office of Central Reference. 25X1 25X1 SECRET 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 SECRET - -An Iranian regime under Khomeini's influence would be xenophobic and probably prone to instability. It would probably not be aligned with either the US or USSR. --Dependent on oil sales for the preponderant share of its revenues, a Khomeini-influenced regime would con- tinue to sell oil t:o the US and its allies, perhaps with the exception of Israel. It might find it ideolog- ically attractive, however, to slow the rate of indus- trialization and therefore institute more conservative petroleum extraction practices. Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 SECRET Ruhollah Khomeini has emerged this year as the leading figure in the opposition to the Shah of Iran. Khomeini, who holds the title of Ayatollah, meaning a prominent leader of Iran's Shia Muslims, is determined to see the Shah and the Pahlavi monarchy abolished even at the cast of throwing Irian into chaos and anarchy. In place of the Shah, Khomeini advocates the creation of a vaguely defined "Islamic Republic" to be guided only by the principles of Shia Islam. This con- cept is not Khomeini's alone; it is a doctrine firmly embedded in Shiism. The eloquent and charismatic Khomeini has amassed wide support among Iran's 35 million people, and has so intimidated the moderate opponents of the Shah that they have accepted his veto over their activities. He does not control the opposition to the Shah, however. Although he has become its foremost spokesman and symbol, the opposition remains an amorphous and disunited movement. Khomeini seems supremely confident that he has unleashed the forces that will destroy the Shah. He recently boasted that the "latest riots herald the start of a gigantic explosion which will have incalculable effects." Shia Islam--Khomeini's Base Shiites constitute about 70 million of Islam's 500 mil- lion believers, and Iran is the center of Shia Islam, with 93 percent of its population belonging to the sect. Shiism is a heterodox sect--the orthodox are the Sunnis--which split from the rest of the community in a quarrel in the 7th century over who should succeed Muhammad as leader of the Muslim world. The Shia espoused the cause of Muhammad's son-in-law Ali. Tn part because of its minority status in the Muslim world and in part because of its role as the "out" part in Islamic history, Shiism has a tradition of support for revolu- tionary dissidence against the established order. In Iran the conservative Shia religious leadership has played a major role in promoting dissent in all of the major historical turning points during this century, including the 1906 revolution and the 1953 crisis. Islam is general does not grant formal religious authority to an institutionalized clergy. A clergy (known collectively Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 SECRET as the ulema) exists, and 'the laity willingly grants them considerable authority, but since theological doctrine denies to any man religious preeminence over his brother, there is virtually no hierarchical structure. The ulema does interpret Islamic law, however, and the Shiite clergy in particular has traditionally had great influence in day-to-day secular matters. What hierarchy does exist in the ulema is determined on an ad hoc basis. When a clerical leader achieves a certain status and eminence, based, on the writings, reputation, and the quality of advice he gives, his followers may refer to him as "ayatollah," and if enough of the respected theologicans and the community accept the title, it sticks. Shia Islam's foremost leader is called the "pishva-ye-moslemin" (leader of the Muslims) and is chosen by a consensus of the Shia com- munity as expressed through the ulema. Such a consensus is hard to achieve. Since the death of the last pishva in 1971, the post has been vacant. Khomeini is widely regarded as the leading candidate, but: the Iranian Government has maneuvered to block any attempt to give him the title. The "mojtahed"-- almost invariable an ayatollah as well, is the legal specialist with the right of independent interpretation. At the other end of the hierarchy are f~he "mullahs" or lesser clergy, prayer leaders, and Koran chanters. Several holy cities are of importance to the Shia. Qom, Mashad, and Esfahan in Iran are centers of Shia learning. Najaf and Karbala in Iraq, scenes of the deaths of early martyrs in the Shia tradition, are important pilgrimage sites. Shia Islam has sever been able to rally wide support for their position in Iran. A traditional bedrock of this support has been the small shopkeepers and merchants of the bazaars in the cities. They provide much of the "khums"--a religious Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 tithe the pious give to tPie ulema. This close alliance between the bazaars and the clergy continues today, and much of the recent unrest in the major- cities has originated in the bazaars. Khomeini also can count on the support of many of his fellow clergymen. The mullahs support his appeals to Islamic law and tradition, and most seem to back him for the post of pishva. There are moderate religious leaders in Iran who have 25X1 disagreed with Khomeini iri the past, but increasingly they have lost the will and the ability to stand up to him. The ulema is not a monolithic bloc in Iran. There are rivalries, and differences. But these seem to work against the Shah, as each faction tries to outdo the other in appeal- ing to the mobs. Khomeini draws his greatest popular support from the lower classes in the urban centers. In the last several years, and especially since the oil boom began in 1973, Tehran and other Iranian cities have grown enormously.* In this milieu of rapid change and social upheaval, many illiterate and often unemployed workers have turned to the traditional values of their religion. A miserable existence, with difficulty in securing justice from the state, has festered in this group. In Khomeini they see the symbol of Shia purity and orthodoxy. * The population of Tehran has risen from 200,000 in 1900, to 540,000 in 1945, to 2,720,000 in 1966, and to 4,400,000 in 1976. Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 25X1, Khomeini also seems i:.o be developing more and more sup- port among the university students. Traditionally a source of dissidence against the Shah, the student population is divided between leftists and su orters of the reli iaus ri ht. 25X1 Khomeini appears to :have little support among senior officers of the Iranian military. Most of the leading com- manders of the military regard Khomeini as a threat to their privileged status in the country and are worried that if Khomeini should establish his Islamic republic in Iran they would lose power. 25X1 Khomeini may have more ~>nnnrt among -junior officers and rank and file soldiers.\ has publicly called upon "the soldiers and younger officers" to "join the people's sts~uggle." Attitude Toward Communism Publicly Khomeini i:~ opposed to any collaboration with Iran's communists, the Tudeh Party. Last October he explic- itly critized the Tudeh for anti-Islamic beliefs and material- istic tendencies. Khomeini also blasted the Soviet Union for meddling in Iran's internal affairs in the past. In May he told Le Monde that "we wall not collaborate with the Marxists even to overthrow the Shah." There is little reason to doubt that Khomeini is philos- ophically opposed to communism as an atheistic force. Although the Tudeh has endorsed Khomeini's opposition to the Shah, there is little clear evidence to indicate the scope of the role the Tudeh Party has played in the disturbances that have beset Iran this year. Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 25X1 gpproved For Release 2004/12/02 :CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 Approved For Release 2004/12/02 :CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 Approved For Release 2004/12/OZ5~1~DP80T00634A000500010002-9 Khomeini in Power--Implications Khomeini claims to have no interest in holding power himself. Nonetheless, a new regime in Tehran led by the civilian opposition would obviously be greatly influenced by his beliefs.* Any regime that replaces the Shah will have to deal with Khomeini and will come under great pressure to allow him to return to Iran and have a voice in policymaking. If Khomeini is successful in unseating the Shah and comes to play an important. role in a future regime in Iran there would be serious policy implications for the United States. We would expect a regime under his influence to be .xenophobic. Khomeini migY~t: --Move Iran away frost its alignment with the US. While it is unlikely that: Khomeini would put Iran in the Soviet orbit, he probably would like to see the country adopt a non-aligned posture. --Cut off Iran's ~~ ael. Iran sells Israel f its oil 25X1 --Curtail Iran's support for pro-Western regimes in the Persian Gulf like CJman. A radical Shia state might in time even try to support dissidence in the conserva- tive Sunni dominated states like Saudi Arabia and Qatar which have Shia minorities. --Renege on business deals with the US. Khomeini has stated that all of Iran's agreements with foreign states--including arms purchases from the U5--will have to be renegotiated in Iran's favor if the Shah is removed. Khomeini might not feel restrained by Iran's dependence on foreign technology in the pursuit of a xenophobic foreign policy. --Dependent on oil sales for the preponderant share of its revenues, a Khomeini-influenced regime would con- tinue to sell oil to the US and its allies, perhaps with the exception of Israel. It might find it ideologically attractive, however, to slow the rate of industrialization and therefore institute mare conserva- tive petroleum extration practices. A devout Shiite is expected to choose a living Mojtahed to whom he will turn and whose advice he will follow in all matters. If strictly followed, this would place a clergy- man at the elbow of every government official. Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 The most significant implication -for the US of a regime under the influence of Khomeini, however, is likely to be instability in Iran itself. In fact he is unlikely to be able to contain the revolutionary impetus he has helped to spark and might be preempted by a leftist regime or a mili- tary dictatorship. Khomeini as an influential decisionmaker would probably find it difficult to reconcile his Shiite principles with the needs of a modern state--there is no precedent in Iran's modern history for what Khomeini proposes. Approved For Release 2004/12/02: CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 STAT gpproved For Release 2004/12/02 :CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9 Next 6 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2004/12/02 :CIA-RDP80T00634A000500010002-9