MEMORANDUM TO (Sanitized) FROM LEWIS J. LAPHAM
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP80T01002A000200010001-3
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
4
Document Creation Date:
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date:
March 4, 2002
Sequence Number:
1
Case Number:
Publication Date:
October 21, 1976
Content Type:
MF
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 180.7 KB |
Body:
MEMOR,~NDUM FaR:.
Approved For Releas~ 2002/05/07 ;CIA-RDP80T0
Room 7E31 Hqs.
STATINTL
Herewith the ~~ manuscript with
-our comments. They were prepared by
Chief-of our Soviet Staff..
STATINTL
STATINTL
STATINTL
STATINTL
+. LEWIS J.
pi rector, Political Researc
Att.
FORM ({{ U5E tNEV10USs.-
'i?7rJ'n` EOI710NS - ?__
21 October 1976 r` 1
Approved For Release 2002/05/07 :CIA-RDP80T01002A000200010001-3
Approved For R~ease 2002/05/07: CIA-RDP80T01002Ai~0200010001-3
Comments' ?ori~ Chapter I`T"I" and IV of paler on the~lace _
of the t-~`raTe un~.on movement. in ~ ayie~' ~iol~c~
We found this expos ion, overall, well informed and
? infarmatiVe,
1. A, question might be raised, Iiawever, with respect
to one major point: do th.e Saviets'at present attribute as
much significance to international labor. as an instrument
of policy as inhere suggested?
? has established a degree of autonomy, or
whether they find themselves confronted with
situations in which they have t:a take a stand:
naturally, against "capitalism,"
p, 36, The CGIL has also withdrawn from active
membership in the I~1FTU, Of course, it remains
to be seen how meaningful this withdrawal i_s,
but in view of the PCPs strained relations with
Moscow it may not be entirely without mean,.ing,
p, 41, Agree with the analysis in the first para-
graph, which however, somewhat contradicts the
earlier suggestion that the Soviets give priority
to strikes or other actions wh~'.ch would directly
weaken the West.
p: 4~,Re the suspicions of pess;imists: There is
one key difference, This time around Soviet
control of the ~lestern European CP"s is no longer
unquestioned.
.~ 2 _.
Approved For Release 2002/05/07: CIA-RDP80T01002A000200010001-3
Approved For Ruse 2002/05/07: CIA-RDP80T01002A~p0200010001-3
3* pi_nally~ the analysis might be strengthened if
the poss~;l~le i~tplications for Soviet TU policy of P?~oscaw's
strained relations with same of the majox'~vrestern Paxties
were to be explicitly discussed in the Euxopean section,
For example, is there any evidence that inter~Party conflicts
-have affected r%toscow~'~s support of TU unificatian? in Ztal}r,
France, or Spain? if not, at what-point might Soviet atti-
tudes change? What implications would this have for the
priorities 1~7ascow has assigned to cultivating relations with.
TU movements in other parts of the world?
Approved For Release 2002/05/07: CIA-RDP80T01002A000200010001-3