MEMORANDUM TO (Sanitized) FROM LEWIS J. LAPHAM

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80T01002A000200010001-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 4, 2002
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 21, 1976
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80T01002A000200010001-3.pdf180.7 KB
Body: 
MEMOR,~NDUM FaR:. Approved For Releas~ 2002/05/07 ;CIA-RDP80T0 Room 7E31 Hqs. STATINTL Herewith the ~~ manuscript with -our comments. They were prepared by Chief-of our Soviet Staff.. STATINTL STATINTL STATINTL STATINTL +. LEWIS J. pi rector, Political Researc Att. FORM ({{ U5E tNEV10USs.- 'i?7rJ'n` EOI710NS - ?__ 21 October 1976 r` 1 Approved For Release 2002/05/07 :CIA-RDP80T01002A000200010001-3 Approved For R~ease 2002/05/07: CIA-RDP80T01002Ai~0200010001-3 Comments' ?ori~ Chapter I`T"I" and IV of paler on the~lace _ of the t-~`raTe un~.on movement. in ~ ayie~' ~iol~c~ We found this expos ion, overall, well informed and ? infarmatiVe, 1. A, question might be raised, Iiawever, with respect to one major point: do th.e Saviets'at present attribute as much significance to international labor. as an instrument of policy as inhere suggested? ? has established a degree of autonomy, or whether they find themselves confronted with situations in which they have t:a take a stand: naturally, against "capitalism," p, 36, The CGIL has also withdrawn from active membership in the I~1FTU, Of course, it remains to be seen how meaningful this withdrawal i_s, but in view of the PCPs strained relations with Moscow it may not be entirely without mean,.ing, p, 41, Agree with the analysis in the first para- graph, which however, somewhat contradicts the earlier suggestion that the Soviets give priority to strikes or other actions wh~'.ch would directly weaken the West. p: 4~,Re the suspicions of pess;imists: There is one key difference, This time around Soviet control of the ~lestern European CP"s is no longer unquestioned. .~ 2 _. Approved For Release 2002/05/07: CIA-RDP80T01002A000200010001-3 Approved For Ruse 2002/05/07: CIA-RDP80T01002A~p0200010001-3 3* pi_nally~ the analysis might be strengthened if the poss~;l~le i~tplications for Soviet TU policy of P?~oscaw's strained relations with same of the majox'~vrestern Paxties were to be explicitly discussed in the Euxopean section, For example, is there any evidence that inter~Party conflicts -have affected r%toscow~'~s support of TU unificatian? in Ztal}r, France, or Spain? if not, at what-point might Soviet atti- tudes change? What implications would this have for the priorities 1~7ascow has assigned to cultivating relations with. TU movements in other parts of the world? Approved For Release 2002/05/07: CIA-RDP80T01002A000200010001-3