AMES BUILDING CAFETERIA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP81-00142R000100080004-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
12
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 19, 2001
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 28, 1978
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP81-00142R000100080004-2.pdf362.21 KB
Body: 
Approved For ease V- Iz2 C use oi; , ~~b'~/04/02 : CIA-RDP81- 142R0 0~~0~@D~ 78-3734 1 2 8 SEP 1976 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence VIA: Deputy Director of Central Intelligence FROM: Michael J. Malanick Associate Deputy Director for Administration SUBJECT: Ames Building Cafeteria REFERENCE: Note dtd 22 Set 78 to Admiral Turner from (with Petition Attached) Sir: 1. In a 9 June 1978 memorandum (Attachment 1), the General Services Administration was asked to discontinue the Government Services, Inc., cafeteria operation in the Ames Building. This action was necessary because of our urgent need. for space to meet iirunediate requirements primarily NFAC related. By reconfigaurIing the cafeteria, we will be able to recoup 7,000. sq. ft_ of office space which will allow us to move the DDA's Declassification Unit ?rom Langley to Rosslyn (approximately 2,400 sq. ft.) and make this Headquarters space available for NFAC's analysts. It would also give NFAC's OGCR, now located in the Ames Building, approxi- mately 4,600 sq. ft. of sorely needed expansion space. 2, Other considerations which weighed heavily in the-decision a. Before making a final determination on closing the Ames cafeteria; every affected component was contacted on expected repercus noes s. Each expected an initial, limited reaction based on limited proportional use of the GSI facilities by their employees, but agreed that the closure should not have major, lasting impact. b. There are 17 commercial eating establishments ;within 2 1/2 blocks of Ames and Key Buildings. Approved For Release.2001/04/02: CI-A-RDP81-00142R000100080004-2 ADMI?v^ISTRATI'JE = IT;TEBII. L USE O TL`~ Approved For ase 2001/04/02: CIA-RDP81 42R000100080004-2 - SCIBJECT: Ames Building Cafeteria and DDA employees in the 2430 "E" Street complex STATINTL d Chamber TATINTL of Commerce Bui ing have cafeteria TATINTk facilities, rely n STATI 2 afaria , snack bar service or use a recen y ui 5X1 A in another.building) . Only snack bar service is available for d. The Ames cafeteria will be replaced with, a large- sized, machine-type snack bar. e. The Ames cafeteria has been losing money for years, and GSI has maintained steady pressure to discontinue- the operation. f* Agency employees represent only of the 7,500 STATINTL Federal employees located in the immediate osslyn area.. None of these other Federal agencies (DoD, State, AID, and others) maintain cafeteria facilities. In this regard, you note that many of the petition signers are non Agency employees and, to the best of our knowledge, have not sought remedial action through their own parent organizations. 3. As you may recall, in your most recent appeal to Administrator Solomon for space relief (Attachment 2), the necessity to recover cafeteria space to meet current requirements was cited. Unfortunately, after months of space analysis conducted simultaneously with efforts to goad GSA into acquisition of new space, it must be concluded that closure of the Ames cafeteria is the only viable means to provide the space necessary to meet urgent requirements.. 4. Attached is a suggested response to with a secO!dTINTL attachment to that note which we believe shoo e circulated as a Rosslyn Area Employee Bulletin. The parking cost situation. is not treated, This has been a continuous problem for over ten years, and we and other federal agencies are legally constrained against providing relief. Please advise if I can provide more information. ys/ Michael N. vala..nicli Michael J. Malanick Attachments O`fIPI STRSTT`Tt = I T =:aL US O N L A Approved For Release 2001/04/02 CIA-RDP81-00142R000100080004-2 ADMINISTRATIVE I;;Tr: ':XL USE O_iLY A roved For Release 2004/04102 : CIA-RD1 81-00142R000100080004-2 Distribu on. Original - Addressee I - DDCI 1-ER 3 - DDA 1/ Subject /~[ - Chrono 1 - ADDA Chrono I - OL Official Approved For ease 2001/04/02-: CIA-RDP81 42R000100080004-2 . Approved For ?ease 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP81-642R000100080004-2 DL'A 78-3734/Z ~iEfOIRANMPA FOR: PROM: Director of Central intelligence- SUBJECT: Ames Building Cafeteria I have received your note expressing your and other Agency employees' concern over the closing of the Ames Euildi ff cafeteria. I have attached a copy of a notice to be circulated to all Agency-employees in Rosslyn which I hope explains the necessity for this action. I regret having to take an action which.,. although cost-effective and necessary to support the basic functions of CIA, nevertheless impacts on employee convenience. I do, however, endorse your forthright notification of employee reaction and encourage continued use of this channel in similar Circumstances. STANSFIELD TEflt R. Att Distribution: Orig - Adse. I - DCI 1 -- DDCI 1 - ER 2- DDA 1 - OL Official Approved For Release 2001104/02 _:CIA-RDP81.-0.01.42R00.0100080004-2-.. ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY =?= Approved For Rase 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP81-?42R000100080004-2 EMPLOYEE BULLETIN ER . No . (Date) CLOSING OF THE AMES BUILDING CAFETERIA FROM THE DIRECTOR: 1. It has been brought to my attention that there is - employee concern over the closing of the Ames Building cafeteria operated by GSI. Unfortunately, the space occupied by this cafeteria is required to provide otherwise unavailable space. Our first move after the closure, however, will be to refurbish some of the cafeteria space into a machine-type snack bar similar to the service afforded components in other external buildings. 2. The decision to close the cafeteria was not an easy one. Agency space requirements have been a critical issue; and, despite two personal appeals to the Administrator, the General Services Administration has been unable to provide relief. Additionally, as employees may have known, GSL.has. consistently lost money in its Ames Building operation and has maintained continuous pressure to, close the facility. GSI's compelling argument has been an inability to compete with the proliferation of commercial eating facilities in the Rosslyn area. The predominant factor remains, however, ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY ..Approved-.For Release.2001/04/02 :' CIA-RDP81-00142R000100080004-2 Approved For lease 2001/04/02: CIA-RDP81 ?42R000100080004-2 DDA 78-3734/2 STATINTL AXE OI2A?vDUM FOR: FROM.* (,, Director of Central In SUBJECT: Alpuilding Cafeteria I have received your no' other Agency employees' conce. the Ares Building cafeteria. of a notice to be circulated in Rosslyn which I hope expl this action. I regret havi although cost-effective an basic functions of CIA, employee convenience. forthright notificatio encourage continued u circumstances. Att ns essing your and ver the closing of ye attached a copy Agency employees ecessity for g to take necessary td vertheless imps action which, upport the. on do, however, endor of employee reaction your d of this channel in sim1. Distribution: Orig - Adse 1 - DCI I - DDCI 1 - ER DDA 1 - OL Official Approved For Release 2001/04/02 CIA-RDP81-00142R000100080004-2 A INISTRATIVE - INTERNAL US NLY r Approved For ease 2001/04/02: CIA-RDP81 42R000100080004-2 that despite exhaustive analysis, we were unable to develop any other viable alternative to meet current and urgent requirements for space to support the basic intelligence mission of the Agency. 3. I regret having to discontinue any employee. con- venience, but cannot support employee convenience over operational requirements. Many of our employees share either convenience or hardship because of our many locations within the Metropolitan Washington Area. It is not possible to equalize conditions to all locations although it is my policy to maximize employee benefits within limits established. for Federal employees. 4. Again, this was not an easy decision, but I have every confidence that Agency employees in Rosslyn will again adjust to inconvenience and maintain their exce1ILent performance. DISTRIBUTION: ALL EMPLOYEES (ROSSLYN AREA) ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : '.C.IA-RD.PB_1-00142ROO0,10008.00.04.-2__. Approved For Rase 2001/04/02: CIA-RDP81 -01P2R0001 00080004-2 A Registry 'MM executive ter/DDA R is a rs ce Dale: VIA TUBE This is a copy of thepp~ Affidavit that I spokINTL you on the phone abo concerning he tiles. att : Affidavit Conch L Order of Gray Tile for So.Cafeteria; Signed by 3 Nov 77. Distribution: Orig RS - Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP81-00142R000100080004-2 Approved For Fase 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP81.-S42R0001000800.04-2 PP%-V.4C`: AC O :974 CO,I%i?L.:AN. CE li`u ~J.-, :n h.G Solicitation of inform ation*is authorized by Executive Orders 10450, 11246, 11478, and 11652, Federal Procurement Regulations 1.6, Title 40 J.S.C. 276a through (3-7, 276c, 318, 318a, 318b, 318c, 318d, and 327 through 331. The information solicited may be used as a basis for the issuance of security clearances,. suitability determinations, determinations in discrimination cases, and to establish liability in tort and damage claims, contractor debarment proceedings, labor standards 'violations, and criminal mutters. ?As-o.resent or prospective GSA employee, disclosure of the informatio:; y-yo ' vo untary. How- ever, employees ~afusv to isy inform ''pn~.Ite~ pro~erly requested to do so may be subject to administrative oath rup-i ono including remove err/,o1oyment. Disclgsure of information by present or prospective Government contractors also is voluntary, although failure to furnish the above requested information where the contract so provides, may result in administrative sanctions, includ;ng oisquuiification to enter into a contract or termina- tion of an existing contract. Information may be transferred as a routine use to appropriate Federal, State, local, or foreign agencies when relevant to civil, criminal, or regulatory investigations or prosecutions, or pursuant to a request by GSA or such other agency in connection with the hiring or retention of an employee, the issuance of security clearance, the investigation of an employee, the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit. Information also may be transferred as a routine use to aduly authorized official engaged in investigation or settlement of a grievance, compI i1FATINTL STATINTL - or appeal filed by on employee. GENERIrL ER1~ICEs AL 1~r~t'rt ~r~ 2001/04/02: CIA-RDP81-0014;~PX0QOO QA 89 Q4-2 Approved For ase 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP81-.42R000100080004-2 OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS STATEMENT FORM STATINTLNAME OF DEPONENT: STATINTL SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: I, DATE: ovember 1977 have been advised by Special Agent L.D. Anderson that he wanted my statement in connection with an investigation of the tiling of the North and South Cafeteria, CIA Headquarters Building I have also been advised that this statement may be used in-a court of law or an administrative acti-on, and I want to make the following statement: I have been assigned to LSD and in the Headquarters Building since ? September 1974. Among my responsibilities is monitoring of day-to-day operations; coordination of the efforts of the Agency Fine Arts Commission (FAC) involving the Headquarters Building and liaison with the General Services Administration (GSA) and General Services Incorporated (GSI) on general matters concerning day-to-day operation of Agency cafeterias and canteen vending machine operations. During the latter part of March 1977 one of my assistants advised me that GSA was ready to lay gray tile in the South Cafeteria. I called Mr. Lynn Young, the GSA Building Manager, and asked him if it was true that GSA wanted to lay gray tile in the South Cafeteria and Mr. Young indicated that they (GSA) were ready to go. I told Mr. Young that the gray tiles would not be acceptable because they would be in conflict with standards established by the Agency FAC. He (Mr. Young) indicated to me that the tiles were on hand and asked me what he was supposed to do with them. I then asked Mr. Young who the tiles had been ordered from and he.indi.cated they were from the company tiles were normally ordered from. I then indicated that I thought it would be reasonable for him (Mr. Young) to ask the company to take the tiles back and issue a credit. At this point, Mr. Young indicated he would simply hold on to the tiles since they could always be used elsewhere. (continued) INITIALS OF PERSON MAKING STATEMENT PAGE- .OF PAGES Approved For ReIease- 20.0.1./04/02 _:. CIA-RDP81-00142R0.00100080004.-2, Approved For ease 2001/04/02 CIA-RDP81-S42R000100080004-2 OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS STATEMENT FORM (continued) I later went by to see Mr. Young and explained to him that the South Cafeteria was not only a very large public area but that it was also an area of executive interest. I told Mr. Young that we would be glad to work with him but suggested that in the future it might be best to discuss obvious items of interest to the Agency FAC before any procurements were made. Mr. Young again indicated the tile would not be wasted and could be used elsewhere. Approved For Release 2001/04/02 :.CIA-RDP81-00142R000100080004-2 ," AFFIDAVIT I have read the foregoing statement consisting of .' pages. I fully understand this statement and it is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I have initialed all corrections and placed my initials at the bottom of each page. I made this statement freely and voluntarily, without any, fh'reats J' ~ "'V' ` or rewards, or promises of reward having been made to n A 1n return PAGE OF PAGES Approved For Release 2001/04/02 CIA-RDP81-0014? 80004-2