MECHANISM FOR CONTROLLING CONTRACT EMPLOYEES AND CAREER AGENTS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP81-00314R000600110018-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
November 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 1, 2000
Sequence Number: 
18
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 23, 1968
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP81-00314R000600110018-0.pdf130.56 KB
Body: 
-Approved For Release 20QW05116 : CIA-RDP81-00314R0 0011 18-0 ~R~_ r~~ MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Support SUBJECT : Mechanism for Controlling Contract Employees and Career Agents REFERENCES : A. Memorandum dated 8 May 1968 to D/PPB from ExDir, Subject: Manpower Controls B. M~:moranda dated 14 May 1968 to DD's from D/PPB, Subject: Manpower Control System Task Force C. Memorandum dated 14 Aug 1968 to DD/S from D/P B, Subject: Manpower Control - Documentation of Contract Employees and Career Agents 1. I believe our discussion of the other day helped to bracket the immediate steps required to get on with providing Colonel White with a manpower control over Contract Employees and Career Agents, hopefully by the end of 1968. The manpower control study group has develope-d what they believe to be an effective format for machine input, appointment and separation control of the Contract Employee and Career Agent. This form goes beyond the detail w'e need as outlined in my memo to you of 14 August, but the group feels it is responsive to the requirements of the Directorates 2. As indicated, we are concerned with something around - employees on this go round and we wish to control this group through ceiling allocations to Directorates, by country. Hopefully we can make the info~m_a- tion input document the appointment vehicle and the payroll authorization. 3. I do not need a machine system for this purpose, but I believe the view of the task force and the computer people deserve careful thought on this point. I believe when you examine the system proposed (Vince is spelling it out in step-by-step detail), you'll agree that it can work and that Approved For Release 2000/05 4& ` CIA-RDP81-00314R000600110018-0' '' "' .t "aric Approved For? Release 2Q~/05/16 : CIA-RDP81-0 ~ a ~(~QF~001~18-0 it will b~ compatible with ~'undaxxienta,lly, the proposal and, systvzxz the task teaxxx ha so:leveloped is a szxna m.a.naneinent information syste,n~ ?'or control 11 l~art of a intez:ded to be all inclusive but intended to ~~ reposes _. task. SIFS ie no = st is not t a xnanagexnent infor ponsive to the zxn~~ectiate inclusive. SIFS deveZo oration system lxez~ se and is a,ll caxe as pment, therefore, xECluires conaiclerable time a na a tota3 entity and I have the c:istir~ct impression that prioritised so as to provide the most essential nzanat7. data first. _t is not bexracrit information `~? Ncvcrth~less, whether we incoxporate the paxt of SIFS now or handle it z-x~a present proposal as with the SIDS is a nza.tt~r ~~>hich you should. decide let e an I would appreciate it if you would nOti`' ecision on th;.c cc:~'Fersannel I3/OCS/D.DJS&T (si~re~t}: t7'olr~ lfa, Is,x~~~.' John, .(~. Clarke :Di.rector of Planninf:;, I'ro~;raminin~, and }3ud~Yetin,~ Approved For Release 2000/05~ Y6~ ~'C1A=RDP81-003148000600110018-0