ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITIES - TASK FORCE PROPOSAL #8

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP81-00314R000600250010-3
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 3
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 27, 2000
• Sequence Number: 10
• Publication Date: March 26, 1969
• Content Type: MF

81-0031AR000600250 10-3
26, March 1969
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Support
SUBJECT : Administrative Authorities - Task Force
Proposal #8
REFERENCES : a) Memo dtd 26 Jun 68 to OGC, OLC, DD/I, DD/P,
and DD/S&T frm DD/S, same subject
b) Memo dtd 3 Sept 68 frm DD/P to DD/S, same sub j
c) Memo dtd 18 Mar 69 frm C/Opser to EO/DDS,
same sub j
. 1. This memorandum contains a recommendation for your approval;
such recommendation is stated in paragraph 5.
2. Reference a) memorandum contained for the addressee's concurrence
or comments a series of nine proposals which required the Deputy Director
for Support's approval. Five of these (Numbers 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10) are now
being processed for publication. Staff recommendations on proposals 11
and 12- have been submitted to you in previous papers. This memorandum
deals with proposal Number 8.. The last remaining proposal - Number 4 -
will be the subject of a separate memorandum.
3. Proposal 8: CLARIFY HOME LEAVE POINTS.
The DD/S&T concurred in this proposal. The.,p?D I acce_pS the
position of the DD/P Jiasainitial disagreement with the propssal
(Ref b was sequently changed to agreement (Ref c) with a
slighfly modified version drafted by the Support Operations Staff.
This is discussed.in paragraph 3c below. -
~9 Qa[ 9C`$ [ QO/ 8/30 CLA-RDP81=Q63.14RQ0060025001.0=
:Approved For Releae 2000/08/30=:
 tr.E C: t ac:_.
place within the U.S. or its territories and possessions. designated by the
rampxuree zor mar purpose, provided:
25X1A
(1)- Initial designation shall be a place at which the employee
Apl5rQved For Release 2000/08/30 CIA-RDP81-003'I 1000600250010-3
or spouse, or their children or parents, have previously established
permanent social and community ties by reason of residence, or in
unusualsituations, any other point approved by the Director of Personnel.
(2): Redesignation shall be in accordance with subparagraph 3(nXi)
above, but subject to justification approved by the Director of Personnel.
b) The Committee Recommendations; The Committee recommended
-enlargement of the permissive designations to include permanent place of
residence (of record), headquarters and other locations in which children,
parents, parents -in-law, brothers and sisters or brothers and sisters -in-
law reside. Also, the employee should be permitted to request, in writing,
other. points for approval such as the location he intends to establish as his
future permanent residence. The Committee suggested that the designation
of the Home Leave points could be contained in an Overseas Agreement
executed by the employee at the time he is processed for his first PCS assign-
ment outside the U.S. Further, redesignations could be requested at any
time but only when the stipulated grounds for making the original designation
are changed.
The Committee also recommended that clear-cut criteria be prescribed
by regulations and brought to the attention of the employee at the time he
departs for overseas. The Committee listed some specific examples of
basis for change accepted by the State Department:
relocation of home of parents, children or other
close relatives;
better climate because of health reasons;
anticipated area of separation for a second career.
c) DD/P Comments: Initially (ref b) the DD/P did not agree with the
proposal. He believed that the prese egulation was sufficiently-liberal
and wished to retain it.urther, he recommended that be 25X1 A
amen ed to require concurrence of the Deputy Director concerned, as well
an the approval of D/f'er , for the initial cleaign.40011 Inc! r-ed@Rignatiori A.?
home leave points.
In an attem_pt_ to resaive these differetees, the Support Operation tiff
on 14 February 1969 drafted a slightly modified version of the proposal which
twas submito and discussed with-t A copy is_atta ched. 25X1 A
Approved For Release 2000/08/30 : CIA-R" QO314R000600250010-3
SY.~nY Y
 (Approved For Rele 2000/08/30 CIA-RDP81-003.1w$R000600250010-3
in part: "Weiwill agree to Proposal #8 as amended."
.4. Staff Comments: This Staff's February 1969 draft, which was accepted
, by the DD/P, included the following pertinent points:
SEC ET
The Office of the DD/P replied to this draft in a memo_addressed to
a) Specific criteria as bases for approval of other requested locations:
State Voting Registration
- Property Ownership
- Places Where Taxes Are Paid
These criteria are hard evidence of fact and seems to dispel the DD/P's
initial objection to the designation of certain places based solely. on employee's j z.
8.~ w. .
as amended by the Support Operations Staff February 1969 draft, summarized
regulations dea d toinncorporate the pertinent procedural faints of the proposal
Support Operations Staff/DDS
Atts 3
DD/P in his initial objection to the proposal.
control of home leave designations, and satisfies a point raised by the .
This, we feel, is a logical step in the proper administration and
b) Designations and redesignations to require concurrence of U*"
25X1A
Att 2: Reference (c) : DD/S 69-1195
''Att -3:' Addendum a.ar? Mal
Att 1: Draft of Proposal #8 dtd 14 Feb 69 frm SOS/DDS
The recommendation contained in par graph S is approved.
.25X1
c) An Approval/Control Mechanism. Our February draft suggested
use of the Residence and Dependency Report as the mechanism for
approval/control. ? It could be this form or some other document devised
by the Office of Personnel to accomplish the purpose.
5. This Staff recommends your approval of Proposal #8, wi iil implementing
Date
~
1-
00314R000600250010-3