PRELIMINARY NEGOTIATIONS FOR SECRET TREATY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP81-01036R000100100061-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
November 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 9, 1999
Sequence Number: 
61
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 18, 1954
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP81-01036R000100100061-3.pdf108.15 KB
Body: 
FORM N0 5-NB DEC 1g.. j Approved For Release 1999/09/23 : CIA-RDP81-01036R000100100061-3 U.S. Officials Only SECRET CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY INFORMATION REPORT COUNTRY Iran/Turkey/pakistan SUBJECT Preliminary Negotiations for Secret Treaty 25X1A PLACE ACQUIRED (BY SOURCE) DATE ACQUIRED (BY SOURCE) DATE (OF INFO.) 18 NNov 53 OF THE UNITED STATES. WITHIN THE MEANING OF TITLE 18, SECTIONS 793 AND 794. OF THE U.S. CODE. AS AMENDED. ITS TRANSMISSION OR REVE- LATION OF ITS CONTENTS TO OR RECEIPT BY AN UNAUTHORIZED PERSON IS 25X1 DATE DISTR. / Jan 54 NO.'`'0F._PA-GES 2 NO. OF ENCLS. SUPP. TO 1. Negotiations preliminary to a secret treaty between Pakistan, Iran, and Turkey have now been; concluded. The central point of the proposed treaty will be a mutual agreement of support in case of armed conflict. 2. Participation of other Middle Eastern states is by no means ruled out. The most desired partner in the treaty is Afghanistan. However, Afghan participa- tion will depend on the solution of the Afghan-Pakistani border problem. There is a desire to take Iraq into the treaty, but not Egypt, Syria, and Lebanon.. 3. The Pakistan Prime Minister, Mohammed All, encouraged the continuation of the conversations with Dr. Sunarjo, which had begun in Dec 1952. Meantime, however, Dr. Sunarjo was warned, by Mohammed Alits opponents, not to form a league with Pakistan, on the ground that Mohammed Alirs position was shaky. Also, Dr. Sunarjo knew that he had to pay attention to the susceptibilities of the Left- oriented ministers in his own cabinet. This would make treaty obligations of an anti-Communist nature difficult. 4. India is notoriously afraid of seeing Pakistan strengthened and equally afraid of being herself isolated. Hence Pandit Nehru would be against the treaty and any participation in it. (This idea may have been put forward, merely to test the attitude of the partners in the league.) However, the participation of 1 India in any anti-Soviet bloc is in the last degree improbable. >: LAST PACE rI re' .. U.S. Officials only DISTRIBUTION y STATEEv. INAVY FBI 25X1A L I I Approved For Release 1999/09/23 : CIA-RDP81-01036R000100100061-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/23 : CIA-RDP81-01036R000100100061-3 25X1A SECRET -2- 5. One reason why the proposed partners want to see merely a bloc that will form a purely northern barrier to the Middle East (excluding Syria) is that the Israeli problem has never been solved. Also, Syrian distrust of Turkish policy forms another reason. Participation of Iraq, should it take place, will hasten the dissolution of the -Arab league,.and make British Hashemite plans doubtful. There have already, been signs of an Iracgian policy, in- dependent of `England. LIBRARY S` 3JECT & ARS,70. CODES 172.362 NU(5K)(1K) 172