RENEGOTIATION OF AQUATONE CONTRACTS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP81B00878R000800050009-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 27, 2001
Sequence Number: 
9
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 20, 1957
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP81B00878R000800050009-5.pdf119.75 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2001/09/b :431-1RISP81B00878R00 *OGC Has Reviewed* 25X1A ME147RANDU4 FOR% copy of 4 20 September 1957 Contracting Officer Renegotiation of AQUATONE Contracts REFERENCE SAPC 19291 dated 12 September 1957 1. 1efereneed memorandum, together with attachment, which th, request our views as to the applicability of Len Act of 1951 to Contract Y.A.501 and contracts 2, and A103. You note that we had advised you in April the Renegotiation Act would not apply to Contract SP.1913 which was for AQUATONE procurement and utilised AQUATONE funds, subject contracts involve the commingling of AQUATONE with Air Force funds and, in sate instances, Air Force funds levy funds. 2. Our April 1956 memorandum (SAFC 5778) recited that the basis for our ruling therein to the effect that the Act would not apply was that by the terms of the Act, as amended (50 USCA section 1211 et.seq.), it applies only to all contracts and related contracts entered into 'by those departments named in the Act or "by'the President by Executive Order issued pursuant thereto and that this Agency was not among those named either by the Act or by rxecutive Order. A current review likewise fails to reveal that this Agency has been so named and wit would thirk, therefore, that our April 1956 opinion would be equally accurate today with respect to Agency contracts utilising Agency funds for Agency Procurement. 3. 144 would think moreover that the fact that the procurement for another department, including departments which are named in the Renegotiation Act, would not cause a contrary conclusion in the AWATONE situation. The language of the appropriate provision, of the Renegotiation Act (50 USCA section 1212) provides that the Act than spay "to ell contracts with the departments" designated by either of the required manners. The language: dose not hinge an tbri purpose of the contract nor on the name of the agency or departneut DC?CLAIENT NO CHANVE-.. 1 I CLASS. ? is s L-gol NEXT F-`,V!:[:1-\Ai AUTH Approved For Release 2001/09/03 : CIA-RDP81B1:16874 otitd156*-% 0U9513 Approved For Release 2001/09/0 F181B00878R000800050009-5 procurement is undertaken, nor onthe pource of since the decision pursuant to*di* procurement far the other departments vas deaiston not to permit the departments far themselves, the current program is procurement undertaken, as the IDICI hes tional interest. it to our opinion, therefore, contrecte, and the sUbcontracts under them, Renegotiation Act. 25X1A r Approved For For Release 2001/09/03 : CIA-RDP81600878R000800050009-5