DOG HANDLERS AND FIRE FIGHTERS

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP81B00961R000100140038-0
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 3
• Document Creation Date: December 12, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 25, 2002
• Sequence Number: 38
• Publication Date: May 7, 1963
• Content Type: MF

SUB.'S
Approved For Release 2002/09/04: CIA-RDP81600961R000100140038-0
('-cyrr/t
dlers and Fire Fighters
eatilt
utilization and contr
the following suggest
A.
discussionsregarding the
of airmen fire fightersa
ns were
Assign the aIrmen to an established
Air Force unit (possibly March or
Nellie AFS) and detail them to duty
at the operating location. In this
case it would be necessary to afford
the designated USAF unit with
Category 2 exemption to cover these
airmen, else it would penalize the
unit with respect to promotions,
levies etc.
Assign the airmen to an Air Force unit
and attach then to one of the organ-
izations of the 1007th Air Intelligence
Service Group for administration with
duty at . . , . It would be
necessary to exempt these positions
under Category 2 for the same reasons
specified in A abovc Under this system,
the 1007th Group would be assisting by
handling the administration of these
individuals. It would also afford a
degree of control over these airmen,
e.g., monitoring replacement actions
and security controls. Promotion
control, however, would remain with the
USAF unit to which the individuals are
assigned.
C. Assign these airmen directly to a unit
f the 1007th AIS Group and concurrently
provide them with A document stating
that the individuals are being assigned
n a non-reimbursable basis and that
they will be non-chargeable to Agency
ceiling; In lieu of furnishing a
document as described above, it is
Approved For Release 2002/09/04.:. cIA-RDP81B00961R000100140038-0
25X1A
Approved For Release 2002/09/04: CIA-RDP81600961R000100140038-0
IC. ET
OH-2384-6S
Page
ble thathe non-reimburs ble/non
able provisions could be handled
informal basis if requested by
and
nt of the airmen to a new unit
would be created under t 1020th
1 Activities Wing and placed with
07th AIS Group for administration.
instance, the spaces would be
ed in advance by USAF and
at the time the organization
%zed. This proposal is very
much li. that described in C above;
t there would be no organ
connection with the 1007th
and there would be no question of
spaces and cefling of the Agency.
?. it is my recommendation that we pursue recommendations
and D. The primary problem with A and B is that the airmen will
be administered by an Air Force unit for whom they actually ill
ot perfors services. It is expected that the Air Force un
would not strongly endorse them for promotions over airmen who do
perform services for the unit. This is especially important in
the dog handler situation where the individuals nominated are
primarily first-term men at AIC level, who, if they saw their
counterpart security in the Air Tore* unit promoted, would feel
that there is little use in continuing in our assignment and it is
doubtful whether we will be able to retain many of then. The
differences between C and D would be of interest to Security Staff
OSA, and it is that C would organizationally tie the new unit to
the 1007th, whereas D would not. In both C and Di, a reverse twist
is used, which finds Colonel Geary supplying spaces on a non
-
reimbursable basis and request the Agency, in the fors of MMI0D, to
administer the unit. This, *PD is willing to assume; however, tn
view of the workload; it will be with some reluctance at subordinate
levels.
25X1A
Approved For Release 204 : CIA-RDP81600961R000100140038-0
25X1A
Approved For Release =mow ,CIA-RDP81600961R000100140038-0
PB/OSA
6 May 1963
krs
Distribution:
0 - PB/OSA
I - AD/OSA
1 - SS/OSA
- PS/OSA
25X1A I D/FA/OSA
- RB/OSA
Approved For Release 2002/09/04: CIA-RDP81600961R000100140038-0