INQUIRY FROM JAMES ANGLETON

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP81M00980R000300020016-0
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 22, 2006
Sequence Number: 
16
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 24, 1978
Content Type: 
MFR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP81M00980R000300020016-0.pdf119.26 KB
Body: 
Approved For if~li~ t.'4' f ;~ ar?A4~1 CIA-RDP81 M00980R000300020016-0 24 November 1978 SUBJECT: Inquiry From James Angleton l.. Mr. Angleton telephoned me I'~ednesday afternoon at about 1640, axed we talked to about 1700. IIe said that he phoned me as my name had been given in the letter to him from the DDCI as being a point of contact f_or getting answers to questions of security that minht arisE~ in his testimony before IiSCA. I can phone him on KE 8-~;>t8. 2. I said that I do sit astride traffic between the HSCA and the Agency, and that while I am in a position tc get answers from the appropriate people in question, and would undertake to do so, I am not necessarily competent to provide the answers myself. I pointed out that we were speaking at the end of the day before Thank>givirig, and I may experience some problems in getting arespanse quickly. He said that he is in no hurry, although I am sure that he will want a fairly early answer. 3. He complained about not having been given natic~? of the Hart testimony, obviously feeling himself a party at interest. I made na reply. He inquired who nominates. Hart to testify. I did not say, but I did say that when it became apparent that the Committee was getting into t}ie bona fides issue on Nasenko and the manner of his hancilir~~, we caught a nearing in executive session. This was deniF~~. us and when a name was requested for the Committt~e's public hearing, John Hart was nominated as qualified to speak or? the subject. 4. Angleton said that the testimony had opened up ~ number of doors. I replied that it had been the Agency's intention to limit the scope of the testimony. We wanted to hold testimony away from the issue of what Nosenko tole us, as there remained operational considerations. The decision was to refer to the bugging of the embassy in Moscow and to refer to Soviet penetration of an ally, witt~~~ut ~y+y~~; ~~,, ~ ~ ,~ 1 p~~ ~ ~~~, ~-~ ~ ~ ~r rAw!6~R66~aY,~v~it:arl~Y~.. ~iti~Y.SiwYIIlA. ~~il~. 4sa~i~r9' Approved Far Release 2006112!26.: CIA-RDP81 M00980Rp00300020016-0 Approved For Relea~e~-~~~~~-~, ~C~ 4~. .. !iN~S f,a i~y3d 7"l$'i P81 M00980R_000300020016-0 ~ ~ ,y,,~.. ,y.5 y k, ', ~ .. r, specifying it. Beyond that the issues were held to the handling of Nosenko as it bore on the case in general. I said that the intent had been to point to doors and not to open them, and that this was how it had been don?". I said. that there would still be reservations about tell~.n~ .this Cammitteea~out the operational considerations. In any. event, I said I was not competent to give him answers on this, and would have to contact both the General Coun~~.~t and the responsible DDO elements. 5. Angleton said that Hart had stated that he .(Angleton)-had. inspected the facility where Nosenko was held; he said this was untrue. He also said that An~letcaa~ had approved hostile interrogation of Nosenko, which he said was untrue. He says he didn't even know about the Katzenbach meeting. As I could not recall thew. sta"temer,c I did not reply; I da recall Hart's saying to me that th~~rc: is very little by way of records connecting Angleton with the handling of the case. Angleton described Hart's statt~- ments as slanderous and perjured. 6. Angleton wishes to review certain documents in .the Agency. He is making a line-by-line review of HSCA xecords, including checking his own testimony of som+c six .hours. He is to give HSCA a line-by-line commentary. 1i. a.s this question that must be addressed. 7. Angleton complains about having to retain an attorney, wham he named as S~lallace Duncan. I alerted Dif~A.. Rininger of OGC. S. D. Breckinridge .Distribution: 1 - DDO 1 - DDA 1 - OGC 1 - SA/DDCI 1 - C/SE 1 - C/CI 1 - PCS/LOC '~11 - OLC/Subj 1 - OLC/Chron OLC/SDB/kjw - 24 Nov 78 ~y..q~,. *~t?.,a Mg Approved Far Release 2006112!26:CIA-R?P81 M00980R000300020016-0