GAO REPORT ON ALLEGED NUCLEAR DIVERSION

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP81M00980R001800060024-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Sequence Number: 
24
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
MEMORANDUM FOR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP81M00980R001800060024-1.pdf90.39 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/11/27: CIA-RDP81 M00980R001800060d S E C R E T MEMORANDUM VIA FROM REFERENCE FOR: Director of Central Intelligence Deputy Director of Central Intelligence John H. Stein Acting Deputy Director for Operations GAO Report on Alleged Nuclear Diversion Our memorandum on the same subject, dated 30 August 1978 1. Action Requested. Review options outlined in paragraph 3 and note recommendations. 2. Background.. Since forwarding Reference to GAO, there has been no response to our letter. We assume the report, as previously drafted, will stand. GAO has asked us to declassify our contributions to this report. We have worked on sanitization of the. report, and this version is attached. The FBI also has been asked to sanitize their contribution and is taking the position that they will not declassify. The Department of Energy's position also is that they do not want to declassify their portion. 3. Staff Position. This leaves us with two options: a. Clear the sanitized report for passage to GAO: (1) Pro - This is responsive to GAO's request. Approved For Release 2006/11/27: CIA-RDP81 M00980R001 800060024-1 Approved For Release 2006/11/27: CIA-RDP81M00980R001800060024-1 S E C R E T -2- Con - In our sanitized report, every effort was made to protect intelligence sources and methods however, the sanitized report still wou reveal sensitive information when considered together with the unclassified collateral material which has appeared in the press and which the House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs has published in a booklet. b. Advise GAO that we cannot declassify our report because of the need to have a coordinated Executive Branch position and our desire to protect a sensitive and. valuable liaison equity. (1) Pro (Our reasons are identical to those stated in paragraph 3a(2) above.) (2) Con - This is unresponsive to GAO's desires. 4. Coordination. This has been coordinated with OLC, OGC, NE Division and CTS. 5. Recommendation. Option B. If you concur, GAO will be advised orally by OLC. John H. Stein Attachments: A. GAO repo B. 'Booklet, 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2006/11/27: CIA-RDP81M00980R001800060024-1 Approved For Release 2006/11/27: CIA-RDP81M00980R001800060024-1 - NE/ISR w/atts Distribution: Orig - Addressee w/atts 1 - DDCI w/atts 2 - Executive Registry 1 - ADDO w/atts 2 - DDO Registry w/o 1 - C/NE w/o atts 1 - C/NE hold w/o 1 - OLC w/o atts 1 - OGC w/atts 1 - CTS w/o atts S E C R E T -3- w/o atts atts - NE/ISR w/o acts 1 - NE ISR hold w/o att Orig: F I :C/NE/rlrmw:6Cl8 Approved For Release 2006/11/27: CIA-RDP81M00980R001800060024-1