U.S. POLICE PROGRAM IS CALLED C.I.A. COVER

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP81M00980R002000100072-0
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 10, 2006
Sequence Number: 
72
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 7, 1978
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP81M00980R002000100072-0.pdf130.35 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/08/10: CIA-RDP81 M00980R002000100ft'i4_ NEW YORK TIMES U.S. POLICE PROGRAM IS CALLED C.1,A, COVER Charge of Intelligence Connection in Training of Foreign Officers Is Repeated in New Book By GRAHAM HOVEY. Special tome New YOr Dimes WASHINGTON, May 6-The United States is accused in a book, to be pub- lished next month of using a program for training foreign policemen as a cover for Central Intelligence Agency activities and for encouraging the torture of politi- cal prisoners in Brazil and Uruguay. The author, A. J. Langguth, also repeats charges that the C.I.A. and the United States Embassy were directly involved in the overthrow of Brazil's elected Gov- ernment by the armed forces in 1964. His book, "Hidden Terrors," will be is- sued June 5 by Pantheon Books. The account by Mr. Langguth, a former reporter for The New York Times, begins on Aug. 13, 1970, with the funeral in Richmond, Ind., of Dan A. Mitrione, an adviser in the police training program, who was kidnapped and killed by left- wing Uruguayan guerrillas known as Tupamaros. The book alternates episodes of Mr. Mitrione's 10-year career as police adviser in Brazil and Uruguay with ac- counts of Brazilian political events before and after the ouster of President JoSo Goulart in 1964 and the alleged United States involvement in those events. Although Mr. Langguth reports many allegations, most of them by exiled left- wing Brazilian and Uruguayan revolu- tionaries, that Mr, Mitrione encouraged -he use of police torture, he also cites evidence to the contrary, and he rebuts the charge, widely circdlated by leftist groups around the world, that Mr. Mitr- ione was a C.I.A. agent. In particular Mr. Langguth dismisses the version of Mr. Mitrione's role por- trayed in the motion picture "State of Siege," produced by the Greek film- maker Costa-Gavras, who, he said, "in- cluded every undocumented rumor" about Mr. Mitrione because his aim was "a composite indictment of United States policy throughout Latin America." Noting that after Mr. Mitrione was killed "male and female prisoners at Uru- guay's jails traded stories about his par- ticipation in the torture," Mr. Langguth adds: "Usually those were second-hand accounts, repeated to convince a doubter that the Tupamaros had been justified in killing Mitrione." Because of the im- pact of "State of Siege" and the allega- tions of the former prisoners, "Mitrione acquired a reputation as his country's foremost expert in torture," Mr. Lang- guth says. SUm10A~ M9Y 7, ~g7gl. -Report of Another Inquiry Ernest W. Lefever, then a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, who did ex- tensive'research on the Mitrione case and k detailed two-year study of the police training program, is more emphatic in ri'ecting the allegations against both Mr. Mitrione and the - program. "Mitrione never had anything to do with the C.I.A.,"; Mr. Lefever told a reporter re- cently.' "He ?nevee taught or advocated methods of torture. In Montevideo, Mitr- ione never even entered the door of the special [secret] police. He dealt with the 'conventional police." The State Depart- ment denied similar charges'in'1973. Under the police program, carried out by the Agency for International Develop- ment from 1954 until it was ter.ninated by Congress in 1975 because it invited partisan criticism, more than 10,700 po- licemen from 52 - countries were trained in the United States. .. The charges that the United States Am- bassador to Brazil, Lincoln Gordon, his staff and the C.I.A. were directly involved in the overthrow of President Goulart have been made intermittently since the .1964 coup and regularly denied by the principals. Mr. Langguth implies in his book that by early 1964 Mr. Gordon, who had been Ambassador since October 1961, was "at the center of a plot to overthrow the Government of the fifth largest na- tion in the world.". 'That's Simply Not True' The author also says that the Brazilian generals plotting -the coup "beilieved their assurances from Gordon and their other United States contacts: If they could hold Sao Paulo for 48 hours, Washington would recognize them as Brazil's ' leg'iti- a mate government." In a recent interview Mr. Gordon, now a senior fellow of Resources for the Fu- ture, a Washington-based research organ- ization, said in reply to each charge, "That's simply not true," and he added that "no assurances were given." He first met Gen. Humberto Castelo Branco, who led the coup and subsequently became President, only six days before it took place, he said. Mr. Gordon also denied a statement by Mr. Langguth that he concluded as early as 1962 that President Goulart was "the greatest danger to his country's democracy." It was more than -a year later, Mr. Gordon said, that he became x convinced that Mr. Goulart intended to stage his own coup against the constitu- tional system and try to emulate the au- thoritarian rule of his mentor, the late Getulio Vargas, or of Juan D. Peron in Argentina-a course Mr. Gordon believed would lead to Communist control of Brazil. Mr: Gordon did concede that the C.I.A. poured money into Brazilian political fronts to support candidates in the 1962 election, though he said he would be amazed if the amount was -anything like the 120 million that Mr. Langguth men- tiom.. "With hindsight, I thought it was a, mistake,"'Mr. Gordon said of the politi- cal funds. The former Ambassador also acknowl- edged that he recommended the forma- tion of a United'States Navy task force for limited intervention in Brazil in the event of a civil war in 1964. The rapid success of the coup aganst President Goulart made the operation unnecessary, so Mr. Gordon called it off while the task force, the formation of which was disclosed in United States documents de- classified in 1976, was still "far from Brazilian waters." Mr, Gordon said he would stand by assertions that the United States was not a participant in the action against Mr. Goulart, that it, had no advance warning and that "even if we had opposed it we could not have prevented it." Approved For Release 2006/08/10: CIA-RDP81 M00980R002000100072-0