THIS IS A COPY OF A TWX(Sanitized)
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP81R00560R000100080008-6
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date:
March 20, 2001
Sequence Number:
8
Case Number:
Publication Date:
January 1, 1957
Content Type:
REPORT
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 94.03 KB |
Body:
:Approved For Relea*001/04/-02 : CIA-RDP81 R0056000100080008-6
C 8 P Y
THIS IS A COPY OF A TWX
STATINTL
In Feb 1955 at the request-of OSI,
STATINTL
STATINTL
C 0 P Y
STATINTL
who had a wire recording of what
was reported to be a Radio sound signal from a flying saucer. OSI analyzed
the tape and said that it was a signal of known US originTATINTL STATINTL
analysis of the tape had shown.
wrote the DCI and said he had been in touch with who could r&TPgT+NTL
him any info on the Tape. He wanted to know who Mwas and whaStT TINTL
In April of this year
INTL
At Air Force request (he had also written AFOIN) we wrote that
another Agency in Govt. had analyzed the tape and that the Air Force would be
in touch with him again. (they had previously written that they knew nothing
STATINTL STATINTL
of the tape but now wanted to protect - identity and not indicate that
. Someone in the Air Force dropped the ball and the
STATINTLletter was never written. - wrote back asking what had happened to the
response he was supposed to get from Air Force.
STATINTL STATINTL
On 5 Aug Capt. Elwood wrote from Wright Feild saying that
_ is and was an Air Force Officer and that the tape "was analyzed by
another Government Organization. The analysis confirmed that the recording
contained only identifiable morse code with came from a known US Licensed Radio.
No further reporting ar action was taken on the recording."
C C
0
P
Y Y
Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP81 R00560R000100080008-6
',--Approved For Releas*001/04102 : CIA-RDP81 R0056 00100080008-6
ATINTL Copy Paget C 0 P Y
has now written to the Asst. to the DCI and said that he has
received two letters from Elwood, one in Apr saying that ATIC had never
received the recording and one in Aug saying another Govt Agency has analyzed
the tape. He asks who the Morse Operator was and what is the name of the Agenny
that did the analysis.
We have called Col. Baird in ATIC who originally asked that we allow ATIC
to answer the query He and we agree that you can
probably do a better job of pacifying than all the letters in the world.
STATINTL Th
t
diffi
lti
h
wo
e
cu
es are t
at the Agency can not be identified since he has
already been told by the DCI's office that it was another Govt. Agency and the
tape has been destroyed.
Please contact him as soon as possible referring to Capt. Elwood's second
letter and identifying yourself as Air Force. Can't make-many concrete suggestions
on how to turn him off but please see if you can satisfy him once and for all.
(Baird's suggestion is for you to put on the concrete Boots if all else fails.).
The DCI's office has not answered his latest Ietter'and will not answer
it if you can satisfy him. If the question arises as it might very well, you
will have to tell him that the Agency in question is one which does nothing
but classified work and would not he able to identify the field of its activities.
Sorry to hand you such a mess but there is no other solution we can think of.
C
0
P
Y
C
0
_P
Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP81 R00560R000100080008-6