MVD SIGNAL UNITS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
8
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 11, 2009
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 9, 1954
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9.pdf419.83 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2009/08/11 CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 CONFIDENTIAL COUNTRY USSR SUB3ECT MVD Signal Units DATE OF INFORMATION PLACE ACQUIRED THIS IS UNEVALUATED INFORMATION 25X1 DATE DISTR. S March 1964 NO. OF PAGES 8 REFERENCES: MVD in Turkistan information only on MVD Border Guard Troops Signal Units. Each MVD border district in Turkistan had its ow goal battalion. Location of all such battalions are listed below. 25X1 he sena ate signal battalion 25X1 was part of the border district headquarters, In 25X1 n there was one, separate signal battalion for each of the following border districts: Turkmen Border District, Hq, Ashkhabad 5 37-57, E 58-g7 Tadzhik Border District, Hq. Stalinabad 5 38-30, E 68-4] Kazakh Border District, Hq. Alma-Ata 5 43.-12, E 76-55 ARMY review completed. CO IDENTTAL Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 CONFIDENTIAL 6. Locations of separate signal battalions subordinate to border districts were given in Para 1, above. 25X1 Locations of subor- dinate signal, units in the Turkmen Border District are given in paragraph below. Turkmen Border Guard All communication facilities for Border Guard Troops were fur- nished by the,Signal Department, Main Administration of Border Guard Troops, MVD, Moscow. civil authorities had their' own telephone, telegraph, radio units, and equipment; likewise, the military had its own signal units. The MVD had its own lines, radio stations, etc,, and there was no coordination (lending or exchange) of signal..units or equipment between the three separate agencies. Each could communicate with the other two agencies by telephone. Border Guard Troops had no direction finding equipment. Border Guard Troops employed no Jamming operators or equipment . was 25X1 Each detachment of the Turkmen Border District had a signal, company. This company was subordinate to the Signal Officer on the detachment staff, and was not considered part of the Separate about 10 officers and 250 .subordinate to the Chief Signal Officer on the staff. of the'CQ, Turkmen Border District.; This, battalion had no companies, but '.consisted of,four platoons: radio platoon, telegraph-telephone platoon, wire construction platoon, and electric devices platoon. .The battalion also had a message center., and personnel for depots, monitoring, repairs, etc. Estimated strength of the The Turkmen Border District had * Separate Signal Battalign CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 CONFIDENTIAL Signal Battalion, Turkmen Border District. The estimated strength of the company was about six to seven officers and 100 EM. The company had a message center and four platoons: radio platoon, telegraph-telephone platoon, wire construction platoon, and electric devices platoon. Each platoon had about one offi- cer and 20 EM. Each border battalion had a Signal officer on the battalion staff and a. signal section consisting of three radio operators, three telephone operators, three electro-mechanics, and three movie projector operators. The section was subordinate to the service and supply company of the battalion, and not,to the signal.company organic to the detachment. .Each border company had a signal unit of three to four signal men who monitored and maintained the electric detection devices and took care of the homing pigeons at the company. the following list of signal equipment for the.2nd Bn., 68th Border Gd. Det.: 50 UNAI-~+3 telephones, one teletype (model unknown), one A-7 transceiver, three RBM transceivers, one switchboard (model unknown), and about 550 km. of telephone wire. Also in supply were several pairs of pole climbers, flashlights, some radio tubes, tools, insulation material, spare parts, and five kilometers of reserve telephone wire. ]a detachment had one telegraph station the locations of the following signal units of the Turkmen Border District (Note: the Turkmen Border District had seven detachments: 18th, 45th, 46th, 47th, 67th, 68th, and 71st.) CONFIDENTIAL 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 CONFIDENTIAL -4- Sep. Sig. Bn., Turkmen Border District Hq., Ashkhabad Sig. Co., 18th Border Gd. Det.., Ashkhabad Sig. Co., 68th Border Gd. Det., Takhta-Bazar 9 35-57, E 62-597 Sig. Co., 71st Border Gd. Det., Bakharden 9 38-29, E 57-29 Sig. Co., 67th Border Gd. Det., Kerki 5 37-52, E 65-1) Sig. Co.., u/i Border Gd. Det., Seranks fN 36-32, E 61-1.17 Sig. Co., u/i Border Gd. Det., Kyzyl-Atrek ff 37-38, E 54-4 Sig. Co., u/i Border Gd. Det., N Si . Sec,, Svc. and Supply Co.., E 1-437, 68th Border Gd..Det. Si . Sec., Svc. and Supply Co., E 62-27, 68th Border Gd. Det. Sig. Sea., Svc. and Supply Co., E 63-067, 68th Border Gd. Det. lst Bn., Ak-Rabat !J 35-27, 2nd Bn., Kushka I~1 35-16, 3rd Bn., Senn-Ali 9 35-52, Sig. Sec., Svc. and Supply Co., 4th Bn., southeast of Takhta- Bazar, 68th Border Gd. Det. Sig. Unit, 6th Co., Islam-Cheshme ld 35-24, E 62-'1Q, 2nd Bn., 68th Border Gd. Det. Sig. Unit, 7th Co.., Kushka, 2nd Bn., 68th Border Gd. Det. Sig, Unit, 8th Co., Medisan N 35-18, E 62-227, 2nd Bn.,, 68th Border Gd. Det. Sig. Unit, 9th Co., Kara Chop fN 35-19, E 62-327, 2nd Bn., 68th Border Gd. Det. Sig. Unit, .10th Co., Berdy-Klych5T.35-19,' E 62-45x7, 2nd Bn.,, 68th Border Gd. Det.. Border Guard Command A lieutenant colonel on the staff of the CG of a border district was the Chief Signal Officer of the district.- He was subordinate administratively to the CG, but technically to the Signal Department, Main Administration of Border Guard Troops, MVD. He had a staff of 10-15 officers under him, including the officers of the district separate signal battalion, which was also under his command. He was responsible for: a. Planning and construction of telephone-telegraph lines. b. Planning and organization of all communication networks in the territory of the border district, including radio, telephone, telegraph, and electrical detection devices, o. Construction and use of electrical detection devices on the border. L CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 18. 19. .20. CONFIDENTIAL -5- d. Procurement of all technical communications materials and equipment. e. Supervision and control of radio and telephone service. f. Maintenance of all equipment given above.- Construction, maintenance, and servicing of communications within the border district'were done by personnel of the border district separate signal battalion. A detachment Chief Signal Officer had the same duties and responsibilities as given above, but limited to the territory of the detachment. Construction, maintenance, and servicing were done by the signal company of the detachment. A battalion Signal Officer was responsible for planning, con- structing, and maintaining radio, telephone, and electrical devices in the territory of the battalion. Construction, maintenance, and servicing were done by the battalion signal section. No Border Guard Troops had any jamming functions. Border Guard Troops signal units, however, monitored telephone conversations and intercepted radio and telegraph messages of MVD personnel only, in order to insure compliance with-security and cryptog- raphy re ulations. All signal units within a border district were subordinate to the district Chief Signal Officer. The Chief Signal Officer was subordinate for administration to the border district CG, and technically to the Signal Department, Main. Administration for Border Guard Troops, MVD. ' All signal supply was the responsibility of the Chief Signal Officer and did not go through the Deputy for Rear Services. Supplies were requested by the company CO on a survey by his Signal Officer. The company CO requested the supplies from the battalion CO or Chief of Staff. The battalion CO or Chief of Staff requested the desired items from the detachment CO or Chief of Staff. If unavailable at the detachment depot, the detachment CO or Chief of Staff requested the items from the border district CO or.Chief of Staff. If unavailable in the CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 CONFIDENTIAL -6- depots of the border district headquarters, the items would be ordered from the Signal Depot, Main Administration of Border Guard Troops, MVD. Companies had no signal items in storage, and no repair facilities. battalion had a small one-story brick depot, eight by eight meters, containing tools, several pairs of pole climbers, insulation material, spare parts, flash-' lights, radio tubes, and five kilometers of telephone wire. Only the most simple repairs were made on battalion level. If a radio station or other signal equipment of..the battalion needed repairs, it was sent to detachment headquarters for repair. Detachment had a depot with reserve telephones radio stations, spare parts, etc. Intelligence Units of the Border Guard MVD Border Guard Troops had no signal intelligence units, and had no signal intelligence duties except to monitor Border Guard Troops radio, telephone, and telegraph messages, and to check the electrical detection devices. .Special trip wires and electrical detection devices were used on the border, namely KLEN-M, 5-2, SV-2, RUBIN, and TANTAL. These appliances were checked and maintained by the signal men of the border companies. On the border, green and red rockets were used to light up areas at night, and also for signals from the border patrols to their company headquarters indicating the following: a. Someone crossed the border b. Send, help c. Call out the OD d. Foreign airplanes crossing the border e. Send two to three EM to convoy an illegal border crosser. Red, green, or any combination of red and green rockets were used for the above signals. No heliographs, microphones, or recorders were used 25X1 25X1 Specially trained dogs were used 24 hours a day by Border Guard 25X1 Troops. The night patrols had two to three dogs with them. During the daytime, patrols would walk parallel to the 10-15,m. .wide plowed strip along the border, looking for footprints of illegal border crossers. Such a patrol would have a search dog to initiate instant search in case footprints were noticed on the plowed strip or the dog smelled something suspicious. CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 CONFIDENTIAL -7- While each company had 10-12 homing pigeons, they Were not used .at all. In fact, in the 6th and 9th Co's., 2nd Bn., 68th Border Gd. Det., cats devoured all. the pigeons.. The unit CO's obtained a few pigeons-as replacements from Co's of other companies. Theoretically, if search teams went into desolate areas, far 25X1 away from their unit station, they ons along for emergency communication. 7r 211.. Border Guard Troops had no signal regiments. 25. Code intercepts and interrogation procedures on classified reports were within the functions of the intelligence section, not the signal section MVD Signal Units with Army Tlno Border Guard Troops signal units were ever attached or subordinate to General Headquarters, Moscow; military districts; or army units on army group, army, corps, division, or other levels. the MVD CONFIDENTIAL 25X1 Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9 CONFIDENTIAL 25X1 MVD signal units were used only by the Ministry of Interior ~ communications equipment was adequate for the MVD signal mission. The over-all efficiency of MVD signal units was good, and they were capable of carrying out their mission satisfactorily, there was a special MVD Signal School for border officers assigned as Signal Officers. EM telephone men received a special three-month training course and radio men a six-month course both given at MVD border district h d ar rs 29, 30? training at signal technical training schools was about 5 technical 25 olitical and 2 general militar sub ects. CONFIDENTIAL a comparison between the technical training received versus Approved For Release 2009/08/11: CIA-RDP82-00046R000300250002-9