PROPOSED REVISION OF(Sanitized)MANAGEMENT OF SUPERGRADE PERSONNEL
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP82-00357R000600080001-1
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
U
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date:
July 5, 2000
Sequence Number:
1
Case Number:
Publication Date:
June 22, 1976
Content Type:
MF
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 88.51 KB |
Body:
STATINTL
STATINTL
STATINTL
}'-~e.lsti
L''.v E~~ d
OLC 76-1579/a
22 June 1976
MEMORANDUM FOR: I Chief, Regulations and Control Branch
FROM:
Assistant Legislative Counsel
Supergrade Personnel
SUBJECT: Proposed Revision of
Management of
I have discussed this proposed regulation with both George Cary,
Legislative Counsel, an his Deputy, It is our belief that CIA,
where possible, should adhere to general Government standards. I would
think that the subject of numbers of supergrade personnel would be an
area where we could follow common standards. The Office of Personnel has
informed me that the Agency has a very generous number of supergrade
positions. I feel the Agency is subject to criticism if it ranges too widely
from general standards where it is not justified, and that in the upcoming
revisions of the National Security Act and CIA Act, we could lose our
independence if we have abused it.
I recommend the consideration of adding the following phrase
after the sentence, "Such recommendations will be based on evaluated
here
position requirements" in paragraph 23. ?L. (2): " conforming w
possible to the basis for grading positions generally applicable to the
general schedule." It seems to me that this language would retain
sufficient flexibility for the Agency, while declaring our intent to
follow general standards if we can.
Approved ~ _ . r.cy_ . ~. _ . --, ...,---? ~r a ~ , .~ r ; 9
UNCLASSIFIED ^ INTERNAL ^ CONFI NTIAL
ONLY LJ SECRET
ROUTING AND it
SUBJECT: (Optional) STATINTL
Proposed Revision o Management of Supergrade Personnel
Chief, Review Staff
Office of Personnel
626 C of C Buildin
FORM
3-62
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
Per our conversation yesterday,
attached are the comments sub-
mitted by the Office of Legis-
lative Counsel.
USE PREVIO 1 i NCLASSI F I ED
610 EDITIONS ^ SECRET ^ CONFIDENTIAL USE ONLY