COMMENTS ON DRAFT (Sanitized) DATED 26 FEBRUARY 1958

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP82-00357R000700030006-0
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 3
• Document Creation Date: December 14, 2016
• Document Release Date: July 17, 1998
• Sequence Number: 6
• Publication Date: February 27, 1958
• Content Type: MF

Approved For Release 2003/04/17 ;SIC-RQ'82-00357R000700030006-0
27 February 1958
25X1A9A MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr.
0
SUBJECT: Comments on Draft
dated 26 February 1958 25X1
1. Policy
a. I believe this is too general. The Council made the point --
evaluation will be prepared for each staff employee and staff agent at
least once each year.
b. (1) Supervisors at all levels do not prepare Fitness Reports.
First line supervisors make reports but the chain of command can make
any determination as to what level of supervisors make out Fitness
Reports. fsuggest: Leave out who makes reports but state annual,
reassignment, and special reports made in accordance with the regulation
(2) I believe it is the understanding that Form 45 will always
be used except for GS-14- and above. It is considered dangerous to leave
a loophole so supervisors at all levels may use a brief memorandum which
generally says nothing.
c. I believe that administrative officers check to see that a report
is complete. Reviewing officials determine whether supervisor is under-
rating or overrating an employee.
d. To show or not show, of course, is the most ticklish part of the
regulation. I think it could be dealt with by stating, "It is Agency
policy that employees be informed concerning the effectiveness of their
work."
e. Last sentence leaves situation that the Head of Career Service
will legally have to show the report when it is inadvisable for medical
or psychological reasons. LRecent Supreme Court decision -- an Agency
or department administrative regulation is the same as a Federal Execu-
tive ruling)
2. Responsibilities -- okay
3. Reporting Schedule -- I think "Types of Reports" rather than "Reporting
Schedule is more descriptive. Under this section a description and schedule
could be included for each type. The Council made the point that signifi-
cance of Initial Report should be emphasized. In the schedule for annual
'reports -- heading should be "To Be Received in Office of Personnel By".
c. (2) There is no way to enforce this since Form 1152 is prepared
by the gaining component.
Approved For Release 2003/04/17 : CIA-RDP82-00357R000700030006-0
 Approved For Release 2003/04/17 : d&`-I bP82-00357R000700030006-0
dated 26 February 1958
25X1
4. Initiation of Reports
a. This is required in case of initial report but I am not sure
RST) wants to be tied down to send list in case of annual reports.
b. & c. These two directions seem unnecessary. This is implied
in description of reports I think.
5. Routing of Reports -- I think all directions necessary are report
will be submitted to Office of Personnel in triplicate. Goes to Head
of appropriate Career Service then to Office of Personnel. Heads of
Career Services may or may not want copies -- this is decided in each
Service.
25X1A9A
/;'l4 au,
SECRET
25X1A9A
Approved For Release 2003/04/17 : CIA-RDP82-00357R000700030006-0
 ILLEGIB Approved For Release 2003/04/17 : CIA-RDP82-00357R000700030006-0
Approved For Release 2003/04/17 : CIA-RDP82-00357R000700030006-0