COMMENTS ON DRAFT (Sanitized) DATED 26 FEBRUARY 1958

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82-00357R000700030006-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 17, 1998
Sequence Number: 
6
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 27, 1958
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00357R000700030006-0.pdf93.04 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2003/04/17 ;SIC-RQ'82-00357R000700030006-0 27 February 1958 25X1A9A MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. 0 SUBJECT: Comments on Draft dated 26 February 1958 25X1 1. Policy a. I believe this is too general. The Council made the point -- evaluation will be prepared for each staff employee and staff agent at least once each year. b. (1) Supervisors at all levels do not prepare Fitness Reports. First line supervisors make reports but the chain of command can make any determination as to what level of supervisors make out Fitness Reports. fsuggest: Leave out who makes reports but state annual, reassignment, and special reports made in accordance with the regulation (2) I believe it is the understanding that Form 45 will always be used except for GS-14- and above. It is considered dangerous to leave a loophole so supervisors at all levels may use a brief memorandum which generally says nothing. c. I believe that administrative officers check to see that a report is complete. Reviewing officials determine whether supervisor is under- rating or overrating an employee. d. To show or not show, of course, is the most ticklish part of the regulation. I think it could be dealt with by stating, "It is Agency policy that employees be informed concerning the effectiveness of their work." e. Last sentence leaves situation that the Head of Career Service will legally have to show the report when it is inadvisable for medical or psychological reasons. LRecent Supreme Court decision -- an Agency or department administrative regulation is the same as a Federal Execu- tive ruling) 2. Responsibilities -- okay 3. Reporting Schedule -- I think "Types of Reports" rather than "Reporting Schedule is more descriptive. Under this section a description and schedule could be included for each type. The Council made the point that signifi- cance of Initial Report should be emphasized. In the schedule for annual 'reports -- heading should be "To Be Received in Office of Personnel By". c. (2) There is no way to enforce this since Form 1152 is prepared by the gaining component. Approved For Release 2003/04/17 : CIA-RDP82-00357R000700030006-0 Approved For Release 2003/04/17 : d&`-I bP82-00357R000700030006-0 dated 26 February 1958 25X1 4. Initiation of Reports a. This is required in case of initial report but I am not sure RST) wants to be tied down to send list in case of annual reports. b. & c. These two directions seem unnecessary. This is implied in description of reports I think. 5. Routing of Reports -- I think all directions necessary are report will be submitted to Office of Personnel in triplicate. Goes to Head of appropriate Career Service then to Office of Personnel. Heads of Career Services may or may not want copies -- this is decided in each Service. 25X1A9A /;'l4 au, SECRET 25X1A9A Approved For Release 2003/04/17 : CIA-RDP82-00357R000700030006-0 ILLEGIB Approved For Release 2003/04/17 : CIA-RDP82-00357R000700030006-0 Approved For Release 2003/04/17 : CIA-RDP82-00357R000700030006-0