NEW FITNESS REPORT FORM
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP82-00357R000700030059-2
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
S
Document Page Count:
1
Document Creation Date:
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date:
July 17, 1998
Sequence Number:
59
Case Number:
Publication Date:
January 7, 1959
Content Type:
MEMO
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP82-00357R000700030059-2.pdf | 43.13 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 _ 899 0007000309-2
7 January 1959
25X1A9a
TO
Deputy Director of Personnel for Planning and Development
SUBJECT New Fitness Report Form
1. It is very late in the day for a member of your task force
to find fault with the new fitness report form, but now that the returns
are beginning to come in I find that one small point calls for comment.
2. In Section D, rating No. 4 runs into the same trouble we
have always had in the past, of supervisors' inability to make meaningful
use of the word "average. " We shall soon find that about 90% of the
people in the outfit are "above average" in most qualities. Sections B
and C avoid this difficulty by rating the individual in terms of the require-
ments of his job, not inc omparison with large numbers of individuals 11 which most supervisors are unable to make. I am sure that most
supervisors will mean by a 4 under Section D just what they would mean
by a 4 under Section C, and that there is no harm in giving large numbers
of people such a rating.
3. The way to avoid the statistical impossibility of rating
everybody above average and to give the 4 more meaning is to change the
wording slightly. I suggest that D 3 should read "satisfactory degree"
and D 4 "better than satisfactory."
4. There seems to be general agreement that the new fitness
report form is a splendid improvement over the old.
25X1A9a
Chief, SE Division
Distribution:
0 & 1: Addressee
Approved For Release 2000/08/16 : CIA-RDP82-00357R000700030059-2