GOVERNMENT TRAVEL REGULATIONS -- PLACE OF ACTUAL RESIDENCE

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP82-00357R000700140004-0
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 14, 2000
• Sequence Number: 4
• Publication Date: June 26, 1967
• Content Type: MF

Appro.---j r!!'.._ o..1......., enn~innin~ .min onDSt~-rrn 7mnon nna40004-0
OGt-HAS REVIEWED.
SUBJECT: Government Travel Regulations -
Place of Actual Residence
1. By your memorandum of 5 June you raised
certain questions concerning the "place of residence" of
returnees as that term is applied under Agency travel
authority. You state that the problem "seems limited to
interpretation of the term 'place of actual residence at the
time of appointment or transfer. "'
The term appears in
which concerns disqualification of employees within 120 days
of appointment.
and is authority for theSTATINTL
travel of an employee, upon separation abroad, and shipment
of his household effects to his "place of residence at the time
of appointment. " We perceive no indication in GAO decisions
or elsewhere that the inclusion or omission of the word "actual"
intended a particular place of residence. In the absence of
statutory or regulatory definition of these terms, _ we believe
the Agency is free to apply, by administrative decision, any
reasonable definitions. Specifically,
Approved For Release 2001/09/03: CIA-RDP82-0035 0,PQ
 Approved For
r 1-
ase 2001/09/03 : CIA-RDP82-0033780,, 0700140004-0
a. We would think the place of residence
at the time of appointment of an employee
recruited by correspondence and interview at
a point outside Washington, D. C. , but whose
appointment in fact takes place when he arrives
in Washington, D. C. to begin employment, need
not be considered Washington, D. C.
b. We would have no objection to either
the place of legal residence (domicile) or the
place of physical residence being considered,
again by administrative decision, the place of
residence at the time of appointment. Further,
we would see no objection to selecting one of these
places with respect to certain employees and the
other with respect to other employees.
Associate General Counsel
Approve