PROGRESS REPORT ON PMMP -- 70'S DDS 28 MAY 1971
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP82-00357R000800180028-9
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
3
Document Creation Date:
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date:
April 24, 2001
Sequence Number:
28
Case Number:
Publication Date:
May 28, 1971
Content Type:
REPORT
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 139.67 KB |
Body:
Apprdvred For Release' 08/02: CIA-RDP82-00357R0008OO1' O9f 8-9
PROGRESS REPORT ON PMMP -- 70's
DDS
28 May 1971
(From In-Person Survey of the Several Offices by
STATINTL
OS -- Step 3 -- Mr. Osborne gave Mr. Coffee oral briefing, along with
narrative report last week.
Based on Steps 1 and 2 -- the OS Career Service thought that
their hump would dissipate sufficiently in ten years to p-
vixis adequate headroom, providing there are no other ceiling
reductions.
Mr. Osborne put in a pitch to Mr. Coffee for approximately 20
young professio year, beginiling in FY 2 for five
rrea- slightly higher thereafter, eeET/ TIUTL
probably won't be accomplished during FY plans less
than five now for Investigation and R &D jobs.
This exercise led them to tonne that by end FY 1975 they will
lose more than 32% of GS-1ZE's 220 of GS-13's (more GS-13's
in number) and 457o of (S-15's.
Look at past five ear showed 1% of GS-13,( 12o of GS-14'
and 45% of Ti -5'left the Career Service Ia, reasons
Used 28% for N/M's to eligibles.
STATI ',NTL
Threw out FY 1970 separations and estimated downward.
Summary tha gave Mr. Osborne was that
at leas junior professionals should be brought
in each year to eventually replace GS-11 and GS-12 levels.
Most people involved with PMMP were accustomed to dealing with
known factors, not, projections.
PMMP led them to take An executive inventory -- OS now has
names of SG's who will and will not retire years) and when.
All but one SG and the majority of GS-15's will retire (age 60)
during the decade. A sufficient number of GS-14's and GS-13's
will leave, thus relieving the current promotional blockage.
Step 4 -- Training concepts remain the same. Division levels
still mainly concerned with what's ahead for the next Fiscal
Year. Next year leave the Program alone; just do an update.
OF -- Personnel Office has completed Steps 1 and 2. This information will
Approved FbP F t@a@LslI 081 ?CIAe DP~$2Q6 ' 0 'tot 8T8 7 June .
STATINTL
STATINTL
Approved For Releas 2001/08/02 : CIA-RDP82-00357R0008 '`1'dbO28-9
OL -- Not started. has
yet. May ca me
package -- hasn't done anything
OTR -- In considering promotability they divided their people into three
groups:
Promotable -- Staying -- Questionable
e ermine when they might be retiring. 5 Their
themselves as retiring before or after end of CY 1975.
Personnel Office is preparing Work Forms 1 and 2, using
method to determine separations at all Grades through
OP/PS approach will be used for'the FY 1976-1980 projections.
OC -- interviewed all SG's and most GS-15's with pure M_M 1TL
t of them declared ..
Board now concluding their work.
Each Board member reviewed a group of files -- used form* that
? C lar'IW_ _-v sea then met and discussed each to reach common
agreement.
Looked at promotables against year they could promote.
Larry would like me to come over in about tee days----and sit down
with rim muTc. and the man of the areer oars
to4-explain- u r package together. This way the
Head of the Career Board swill eliminate debating and second
guessing on part of Board members as to how findings will be
put together or re-formulated.
Copy attached.
Approved, For Release 2001/08/02 : CIA-RDP$2-( 0357R000800180028-9
Cc
Approved For Release 08/02 : CIA-RDP82-00357R000800489 18-9
GRADE MARI'T'AL STATUS MILITARY
EDUCATION - DEGREES
LANGUAGES
CIA EOD 0/S DUTY U YES NO.
TIME IN GRAPE
TYPE /1 PM INSTRUCTOR L_1 MANAGEMENT OTHER
ASSIGNMENTS Lam/ VARIED /_/ LITTLE VARIETY
FORMAL TRAINING L1__1 EXTENSIVE AVERAGE
LI
V V.N11JW1J ? I! t '
(Average)
ADEQUATE L_/ SPOTTY (Up and Down)
DO REVIEWING OFFICIALS COT ENTS GENERALLY AGREE WITH RATER? YES / / 110
DO LETTER/N0. GENERALLY AGREE WITH/i1ARRATIVE / /YES. NO
INDICATION OF PROBLEMS AFFECTING PERFORMANCE / / YES / / NO
DO YOU KNOd RATERS AND/OR REVIEWERS? / / YES L1_1 NO
JUDGEMENT : L_j PROMOTABLE
L_/ REMAIN IN GRADE
L_/ QUESTIONABLE
Approved For Release 2001/08/02 : CIA-RDP,82-00357R000800180028-9