SOME SUPRISES REVEALED BY TWO - YEAR U.S. EMPLOYE ATTITUDE STUDY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82-00357R000900120002-1
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 20, 2006
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 17, 1976
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00357R000900120002-1.pdf123.06 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP82-00357R000900120002-1 Some Surprises Revealed b Two-Year U.S. Emplo)'e Y Attitude Study By, John Cramer Washington Star Staff Writer What may have been the most comprehensive s r u - veys in recent years of federal employe attitudes to- ward their jobs were conducted in 1974 for the Civil Service Commission - but with the results only re- cently made public. The surveys covered 8000 k wor ers in five agencies ,., "How do you feel about the performance evaluation, le a snd some of responses were tvprising, to say the procedure?" Thirty-eight percent thought it should be retained; 38 percent thought it should be changed; and' Typical questiaiys - some expressed in statement 23 percent thought it should be eliminated. form -'and',ical answers, with some minority "How would ou rate our views deleted: Y your pay, considering your duties and responsibilities?" Thirty percent rated it "The better my performance the better will be m , y good; op 32 percent "so-so' and 38 percent portunity for an award (incentive award, outstand-E g~ to very or very ort nine of a emplo ?' ---' - I' -- .-,- -now would you rate your pay considering what you yes disagreed; only 32 percent agreed. 1isc ueuer my performance, the better will bet, portunity for promotion to a higher-level job " A- greeing. .. ,, , "How would you rate your bureau's fairness in se- awards (outstanding ratings,etc.)" Only 20 percent letting employes for promotion to higher level jobs?" thought it very good-good; 56 percent thought it poor- Seventeen percent rated it very good-good; 56 percent very poor. rated it poor-very poor. "How do you like your job - the kind of work you "I am satisfied with my advancement to better jobs. do?" Twenty-eight percent called their jobs "very since starting to work in this bureau." Thirty-three good"; 34 percent "good; 26 percent avera e; onl 12 g y percent said they were; 57 percent said they weren't. percent poor-very poor. "I would very much like to move into a supervisory "My job gives me a feeling of worthwhile accom? ppoosition (if you already are a supervisor, think of a plishment." Fifty-two percent answered in the affirm- higher management job)." Forty-eight percent want ative; only 26 percent in the negative. ed to move; 31 percent didn't. "My job is graded at the proper level." Thirty-one "I would like very much to move into a higher-level' , percent agreed; 55 percent disagreed. 'I agree with the last promotion appraisal f re-~ "ALL IN ALL, how much trust and confidence. do they d. ' Forty percent said they did; 23 percent sai t r* you have for your immediate supervisor?" Twenty- try?" Thirty-nine percent rated it good or very good; ? incentive and awardsjprog amnon employe perform ; tle"; and 15 percent "very little or;none ercenf "a lit- 30 percent so-so and 31 percent rated it poor-very ante?" Twenty-five percent thought it raised "My immediate supervisor is competent technically poor' ppeerformance "a great deal"; 26 percent thought it ;,{knows the job)." Fifty-five percent agreed; 21 per- "I am satisfied with my opportunity to earn more :helped "a little" 40 h h ` L ; percent t oug t it had no impact cent disagreed . . " I AGREE WITH the last perform money on my present job." Forty percent agreed; 41 "Over-all what do performance ratin o I thi k i th M i ff c g y u re n s e e y ect of the mmediate supervi itt i 'h ,sors compeennuman eived from my supervisor." Roughly 49 percent said percent disagreed. incentive and award program on employe morale?" relations' (dealing with people)." FiftYfive percent hey did agree; only 22 percent didn't Twenty-eight " orale HOW WOULD YU pug m a ,agreed 25 percent did You get criticized much more quickly for rate your .O opportunity to move great deal`"; 26een thoht percent helpeda little,'sagre ee.ere. " poor per- into a better job in r It is difficult to gfired Is Fifty-three percent rmance you get Praised far pop perf~',~ ' than it ~u. ;158 teen percent cent Twenty-six percent thought it morale. had no impact; 20 p r - ., agreed;on1Y 1$ percent disc reed. foe'" Sbity-five perm agreed. opportunity very l pednt rated cethought it lowered g pea f favoritism Fifty-seven t pow or.. poor- ere is a t`deal o " In deci ft which employes will r r Ypercent a oily 15 percent disagreed greed. Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP82-00357R000900120002-1