HUNGARIAN-RUMANIA PROPERTY AGREEMENT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82-00457R002300600004-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 5, 2001
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 10, 1949
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00457R002300600004-0.pdf251.79 KB
Body: 
Approved For R Wpkj ?Rd WRW82-00~*V, IN~IFORMA ET `-'O T CD NO. COUNTRY PLACE ACQUIRED DIE OF IN 25X1X6 LASSIFICATION k e C F\'h CO' ~~ ~~ s H 'Y~a Hungarian-Rumanian Property Agreement 25X1A6a SrATF NAVY Document N M , +s+'e In early 1948, a preliminary agreement. was signed by Dr. Iatvan Antos,. State Secretary of the Hungarian. Ministry of Finance, and Secretary General Joia of the Rumanian Ministry of Finance establishing four plenary mixed committees to negotiate agreements on economic problems involving the two countries. Committee No. 1 established legal and administrative channels and provided for mutuaAl legaiisistaace and reciprocal exchange of. archives on all matters within the jurisdiction of the other three committees. The work of this committee was completed in the summer of 1948. Committee No. 2 established ways and means for commercial and financial trans- actions ben the two countries. An agreement was reached in principle on facilities to be used in commercial and financial transactions, but the Rumanian and Hungarian National Hanks and the members of the commmittee have not yet been able to agree on a stable rate of exabange between the forint and the lei. Committee No. 3 is concerned with pbatal and railroad communications. on renoes are still in progress. Committee No. 4 has jurisdiction in all other economic problems confronting Eire ug eo entries. Antos, representing the Hungarian Government, and i1lexander Jacob, Rumanian Deputy Minister of Finance, are co-chairmen of the committee. One of the most important problems immediately confronting the commiittee was settlement of the status of Hungarian-owned properties in 2 ~ X6 and Rumanien?owrned properties in Hungary. Ruman Co Comtaentt All Hungarian-owned property in Rumania was sequestered -Allived Rumanian Government which was established toward the and of the last wars This action has been applied also to Hungarian property in territories later annexed by Rumania, including land belonging to more than 10,000 Hungarian farmers who have left northern Transylvania since the and of 1944.) 2. In the course of deliberations. by Committee No. 4, Antos,. in the opinion of his Hungarian colleagues, let the farm land problem remain unsolved. He stated that farm land belongs to the person cultivating it, and that the title to farm properties nationalized by the pro-Allied Rumanian Government vihen the Hungarian owners i led to rem sin was not a matter of first importance. The United St i g V~QC ~O or Kem DATE DISTR. 10 February 1949 NO. OF PAGES S NO. OF ENCLS. (USTED BELOW) SUPPLEMENT TO REPORT NO. /22 : CIA-RDP8--'0, Approved For Release 20%03/2:8"2.04578002300600004-0 ET 25X1X6 25X1A 25X1X6 The Hungarian delegation did not consi der this a formal renunciation of Hungarian rights to the farm properties in question, however. 3. Another problem to be considered was the status of HHungarian-owned industrial Antos stated that the Hungarian Government appreciated Rumanian efforts to liquidate the capitalist system and that the Hungarian Government recognized the nationalization by Rumania. of the numerous industrial enterprises vt+hich formerly belonged to Hungarian nationals in Rumania. For this reason the Hungarian Government was not attempting to bring about the return of these industrial properties to Hungarian otmorship, nor did it intend to create a precedent whereby the 'Jestern powers might introduce claims for nationalized property in Hungary formerly owned by rJestern nationals. Anton requested, therefore. that the Rumanian Government compensate Hungary for nationalized industrial establishments formerly owned by Hungarian citizens, but that the transaction be disguised so as not to reveal the real reason for payment. The Rs nian oorrdttee members refused to commit themselves on this point, but agreed to forward Antos' request to the Rumanian Cabinet for consideration. enterprises which had been nationalized by Rumania. Comments .1hereas there are considerable Hungarian industrial of ngs the present borders of Rumania, there are almost no Rumanian industrial holdings in Hungary). not give any indication when a decision was expected on this point. Apparently, the matter was still pending on 21 September 1948, Since property in this category is excluded from the terms of the formal agreement and its confidential annex signed on that date, which are discussed below.) On 21 September 1948, an agreement was signed by Committee No. 4, stating that all privately-owned houses, furniture, and other personal belongings in Rumania to which Hungarian nationals once held title, were to be released to their Hungarian owners by Casbi, Rumanian Property Control Office. remarks which follow, it seems that this action' u e unqualified release of all the proper involved to its former owners, but merely recognition of their ownership.) it was further agreed that a small amount of the movable property involved, as defined in a "type inventory," was to be. released for restitution; movable property in excess of the "type inventory" was to be sold and the proceeds used to cover transport and administration expenses incurred in the private property restitution Drocess. In cases concerning privately-owned real estate, it would be permissible to nxohange houses and buildings ovmod by Hungarians in Rumania for similar privately-amed property in Hungary after payment to the Rumanian Government of one half of the usual taxes assessed on property transfer transactions; the Hungarian Government agreed to grant the same rights to Rumanian nationals having real estate in Hungary. 5. In a confidential appendix to the 21 September agreement, Hungary renounced its right to properties in Rumania formerly owned by juridical persons (corporations and other legal entities) of Hungary, except for industrial enterprises and real estate which have been nationalized by the Rumanian Government. Hungary also renounced its rights to movable properties, not a part of an industrial establishment, which are now in the-possession of a Rumanian state institution, Rumanian Communist Party, or any recognized "democratic mass- organizations"; rights to properties in this latter category were renounced E E Approved For Release 2001/03/22: IA-RDP82-00457R002300600004-0 Approved For Release 2001/03/22: CIA''" 4p . SEC CENTRAL INTELLDCENCE AGENCY regardless of whether the properties were formerly privately-owned by Hungarian nationals, by juridical persons, or by the Hungarian Government. In reciprocation for Hungarian concessions made in the confidential appendix, the Rumanian Government renounced its rights to all deported goods of Rumanian origin within the state boundaries of Hungary as of 21 September 1948, including Jewish gold from Transylvania which was rvstituted to Hungary by French authorities. 6. Antos refused to claim $1,000,000 worth of pipe belonging to M. RT, Hungarian-American Oil Company, which is now in Rumanian possession, although the M&CR2' representative in Rumania requested Antos to claim the pipe. SECIET Approved "For Release 2001/03/22 : IA-RDP82-00457R002300600004-0