PRESENT POSITION OF THE DAI VIET PARTY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82-00457R007900410004-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 17, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 2, 2000
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 8, 1951
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00457R007900410004-0.pdf82.38 KB
Body: 
jpproved For Release 2000/06/26 : CIA-RDP82-00457R007900410004-0 CLASSIFICATION Co CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY REPORT NO INFORMATION REPORT COUNTRY Indochina SUBJECT Present position of the Dai Viet Party 25X1 C PLACE ACQUIRE 25)U,d rE OF CD NO. DATE DISTR. 8 June 1951 NO. OF PAGES 1 NO. OF ENCLS. (LISTED BELOW) SUPPLEMENT TO REPORT NO. 1. On 28 hay 1951 General de Lattre asked Dai Viet leaders Lo Thang and Phan Huy Cuat to a private conference in Hanoi. De Lattre told both Thang and Quat that he was anxious to secure the support of the Dai Viet and assured them that Vietnam would ultimately gain the independence all have been seeking. 2. The Dai Viet party, relatively cohesive up to the present, is now divided into three groups: a. Those in favor of all-out collaboration with the French. b. Those opposing collaboration or cooperation with either the French or the Tran Van Huu government. c. Those favoring limited collaboration, but desiring to maintain an independent position in order to remain in contact with non- and anti-Communist nationalists within the Commmunist-controlled rebel regime. This group urgently wishes to retain the confidence of its non-Communist supporters in the rebel zones. 30 rna u AviLs Mats: - Approved For Release 2000/06/26: CIA-RDP82-00jW790 It is believed that de Lattre has convinced Le Thang and his supporters of the necessity of cooperation at this time. However, the strong enmity of Tran Van Huu and his close supporters toward the Dai Viet leadership may result in attempts to eliminate key members of the Dai Viet organization despite their clearly anti-Communist attitude and position. CLASSIFICATION .~ /aaea to , . b re9 the ?ot \s c0o dalcei o'm t?. e j~15 dote t1At- tin a 1c378 to r%ce 0 CON(1 AG O nei~te te09- Ot ab d sta otGe 11 ~,Oirector the t ?{ 2pa~ pate; Prch~vis w C3eV~e