JPRS ID: 9373 WEST EUROPE REPORT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82-00850R000300040053-6
Release Decision: 
RIF
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
51
Document Creation Date: 
November 1, 2016
Sequence Number: 
53
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
REPORTS
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00850R000300040053-6.pdf2.94 MB
Body: 
APPROVE~ FOR RELEASE= 2007/02/08= CIA-R~P82-00850R000300040053-6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/08: CIA-RDP82-00850R000300040053-6 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2047102108: CIA-RDP82-00850R000300040053-6 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY JPRS L/9373 29 October 1980 \l1/est E u ro e R e o rt p p (FOUO 43/80) FBIS FOREICN BROADCA~T INFORMATION SERVICE FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/08: CIA-RDP82-00850R000300040053-6 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/48: CIA-RDP82-44850R000300044453-6 ~ NOTE 3PRS publications contain information primarily from foreign newspapers, periodicals and books, but also from news agency - transmissions and broadcasts. Materials from foreign-language sources are translated; those from English-language sources are transcribed or reprinted, with the original phrasing and other characteristics retained. Headlines, editorial reports, and material enclosed in brackets are supplied by JPRS. Processing indicators such as [TextJ or [Excerpt] in the first line of each item, or following the - last line of a brief, indicate how the original information was _ processed. Where no processing indicator is given, the infor- mation was summarized or extracted. ~ Unfamiliar names rendered phonetically or transliterated are enclosed in parentheses. Words or names preceded by a ques- � tion mark and enclosed in parentheses were not clear in the original but have been supplied as appro~riate in context. Other unattributed parenthetical notes within the body of an item originate with the source. Times within items are as given by sov~ce. The contents of this publication in no way represent the poli- cies, views or attitudes of the U.S. Governmen~t. COPYRIGHT LAWS AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING OWNERSHIP OF ~ MATERIALS REPRODUCED HEREIN REQUIRE THAT DISSEMINATION OF THIS PUBLICATION BE RESTRICTED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONI.Y. APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/08: CIA-RDP82-00850R000300040053-6 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/48: CIA-RDP82-44850R000300044453-6 . ;CIAL USE ONLY - JPRS L/9373 29 October 1980 WEST EUROPE REPORT (FOUO 43/80) CONTENTS THEATER NUCI,EAR FORCES FRANCE Strategic Considerations for Use of Neutron Bomb (Jean-Baptiste Margeride; STRATEGIQUE, Jul-Sep SO) 1 Missile Program Launched by Ministry of Defense (AIR & COSMOS, 13 SQp 80) 12 Demolition Rocket Varieties Described (AIR & COSMOS, 13 Sep SO) 14 _ Status of Fxocet MM-40 Missile Updated (AIR & COSMOS, 6, 13 Sep 80) 16 New Ex~cet Adopted Deliveries To Begin Soon, by Pierre Langereux EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT IT.ALY PSI's Dido Co~nents on Role of European Parliament - (Mario Dido; CORRIERE DELLA SERA, 13 Sep 80) 18 COUNTRY SECTION FRANCE Delpey, Bokassa, Diamond Affair Resurfaces (Rene Backmann; LE NOUVEL OBSERVATEUR, - 20-26 Sep 80) 21 - a - [III - WE - 150 FOUO] FC1R OF.'FICIAL USE ONLY _ _ , ; , APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/08: CIA-RDP82-00850R000300040053-6 APPR~VED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/08: CIA-RDP82-00850R000300040053-6 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY How Will Franc Fare With Voter's Budget? i (Roger Priouret; LE NOUVEL OBSERVATEUR, 13-19 Sep 80) 24 ' Food Industry Needs Boos:, New Goals, Methods (Henri de Farcy; PROJET, Sep-Oct 80) 27 ; Injecting Cattle With Estrogen Causes Scandal, Boycott (Fierre-Marie Doutrelant; LE NOUVEL OBSERVATEUR, , 20-26 Sep 80) 32 SPAIN ICSA-Gallup Poll cn Andalucia Autonomy (CAMBIO 16, 14 Sep 80) 37 -~i ~ ~ ~ ~ _ 'I ~ ~ - b - . FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/08: CIA-RDP82-00850R000300040053-6 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02148: CIA-RDP82-44850R000300044453-6 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY THF'~ATER NUCLEAR FORCES FRANCE ~ STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS FOH USE OF NEUTRON BOMB Paxis STRATEGIQUE in French No 7 Jul-Sep 80 pp 123-134- [Article by Jean-Ba.ptiste Maxgeride: "The F~ihanced Radiation Weapon - Past V: Stratzgic-~ Positions and':;~~nclusions"~ [Text] General Points It is obvious that a nation which agrees to make the necessary effort to - equip itself with neutron bombs will have obtained new and significant mili- tary capabilitie~-. It is also necessaxy: - to have a significant number of weapons. To hold a few samples would hardly have any practical significance (except for the fact that it would indicate a high degree of technical and scientific ability~. It implies that one has large quantities of "military gxade"`plutonium, that is to say ~-239�~' We will return to this plutonium problem; * The word strategic is used here in its most general sense, that is to say going beyond the military field. Let us recall that military Pu is isotope 239 of the element. It is pro- duced spontaneously in nuclear reactors: the capture of a neutron by a U-238 nucleus, then emission of an electron which produces Np-239, then a second one leading to Pu-239� Later on, through the capture of a neutron, this isotope can produce Pu-24~0, then Pu-241, etcetera. Pu-24~0 presents the inconvenience of being a much more active neutron transmitter than isotope 239. Its presence, in a not inconsiderahle quantity (staxting at 5 to 10 percent?~, within the core of a fission weapon or in the initial stage of a fusion xeapon can only lead to a breaking down of the energy of the explosion. In effect, Pu-240 acts, so to speak, as a permanent premature percussion cap. The production of Pu-239 in;jthe reactor is proportional ta the length of time the fuel rods stay in i`tit.,%' The production of Pu-2~0 is proportional to the period of irradiation`of isotope 239, already present; that is ~ 1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 1'~ APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/08: CIA-RDP82-00850R000300040053-6 APPR~VED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/08: CIA-RDP82-00850R000300040053-6 FOR OFFICIAL USE OM.Y - to study~ develop and produce a range of launching systems (ground to - ground, air to ground, possibly o ound to air~, unquestior~ably closely ; adapted to each of the contemplated uses; thus, very diversified. Thus, a - significant financial burden which would be added to the study and develop- ; ment of the nucleax warheads; - - finally, and primaxily, the production of these weapons must respond to a real if not of capital importance need, in view of the above men- tioned financial burdens and assuming a modest dsfense bud.get. In this regard, the situation of France is not necessarily the same as that of the United States, the USSR or �he other nucleax na.tions. What is invol- ved here is a political-strat~~g~c problem which would require a specific, very delicate, study because there axe ha,:dly any rigid matheriiatical proofs in these matters. We will, thus, limit ourselves to touching on these questions for want of being able to claim having decisive answers to them. French Neutron Bomb Possible?~ One must distinguish between the scientific and technical capabilities of a state and its economic and financial capabilities. to say, ultimately, to theperiod of irradiation squared. Thus, it is very slow in the beginning, then more and more rapid. What is involved here is a first approximation, valid oniy for a few weeks, a~ it is ob- vious that, after a while, Pu-240 cannot be produced more rapidly than ' ~-239 frcm which it originates. Consequently, the obtaining of milit�arv ~rade ~lutonium requires that the length of time the fuel rods are in the reactor be relatively short. � This ti;ae period is inversely proportional to the flow of neutrons which exists in the "core" axea of the reactor where the fuel rod is placed. As the priming of the fusion only requires a little energy for the neu- ~ tron bomb, one might think that the presence of a significant proportion of Pu-240 would not cause any inconvenience. It seems that this idea is ~ wrong and that, in this case also, the priming must primarily consist of Pu-239. As a matter of fact, the presence of significant quantities of the isotope 24~0 would lead to the deterioration of the tritium and of - the electronic system; moreover, it would be very difficult to obtain a well defined primary energy 1eve1; an excessive permanent overheating of the weapon, etcetera, all of which are phenomena to be avoided. ~ Axticle written prior to the news conference of the head of state, on - 26 June 1980. 2 FOR OFFICIAL USE O;VLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/08: CIA-RDP82-00850R000300040053-6 APPR~VED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/08: CIA-RDP82-00850R000300040053-6 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY We believe that we are right in postulating that our experts should be able _ to solve a11 the problems which arise frcm the study, the perfection and the production of the weapon. However, the possihle decision to go on to the perfection and production stage belongs solely to the piihlic authorities, who could not commit themselves without relying on stu3ies, wh'S.ch would be unquestionably of a preliminary nature, but already important and signifi- c~,nt. For example: - scientific and technical studies to define and articulate the difficulties which will have to be overcome, to develop a calendar of development; - strategic and tactical studies to determine, first of a11, the real use- fulness of these weapons in view of the overall defense policy of France; the types of weapons and delivery systems and the number by type, if their possession appeaxs necessary; finally, the i.mplementation procedures req,uired. for the weapons systems decided upon; - financial studies, because~ once again, defense budgets do not a11ow , everything to be done simultaneously and in a11 fields; - economic studies, because a significant supply of neutron bombs could only be obtained at the expense of several electricity producing fast breed~r reactors.~- Now, these reactors appear to be the only way to c~ver the perind until we have developed for industrial use in the year 2020? 2050? 2100? the real thermonuclear energy source, that is to say the fusion of _ Let us recall that the fast lzreeder system allows approximately 60 times more energy to be produced from a given mass of natural uranium, than do the current reactors. This means: - tha,t it multiplies by 60 our national reserves currently considered to be economically exploitable by -che conventional power stations (PWR [Fressurized Water Reactor], BWR [Boiling Water Reactor], etcetera~; - primarily, that it allows the exploitation, under profitable consi- tions, of ores which ar