JPRS ID: 9724 SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA REPORT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82-00850R000400050020-0
Release Decision: 
RIF
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
33
Document Creation Date: 
November 1, 2016
Sequence Number: 
20
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
REPORTS
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00850R000400050020-0.pdf2.46 MB
Body: 
APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400050020-0 FOR OFF[CIAL IJSE ONLY JPRS L/9970 9 ~eptember 1981 USSR Re ort p ECONOMIC AFFAIRS CFOUO 12/81) ~BIS ~OREIGN BROADCAST INFORh/IATION SERVICE FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400050020-0 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400050020-0 NOTE JPRS publications contain information prima.rily from foreign newspapers, periodicals and books, but also from news agency transmissions and broadcasts. Materials from foreign-language sources are translated; those from English-language sources are transcribed or reprinted, with the original phrasing and other characteristics retained. Headlines, editorial reports, and material enclosed in brackets are supplied by JPRS. Processing indicators su;.h as [Text] or [ExcerptJ in the first line of each item, or following the last line of a brief, indicate how the original information was processed. Where no processing indicator is biven, the infor- mation was summarized or extracted. Unfamiliar names rendered phozetically or transliterated are enc?osed in parentheses. Words or names preceded by a ques- tion mark and enclosed in parentheses were not clear in the original but have been supplied as appropriate in context. Other unattributed parenth~tical notes within the body of an item originate with the source. Times within items are as given by source. The contents of this publication in no way represent the poli- cies, views or attitudes of the U.S. Government. COPYRIGHT LAWS AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS REPRODUCED HEREIN REQUIRE THAT DISSEMINATION OF THIS PUBLICATION BE RESTRICTED rOR OFFICIAL USE ONI,Y. APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400050020-0 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400050020-4 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY JPRS L/9970 9 September 1981 USSR REPORT ECONOMIC AFFAIRS (FOUO 12/81) CONTENTS PLANNING AND PLAN IMPLEN~TTATION Meeting on Scienti#Yc-Technical Programs Reviewe d (L. Peshkova, V. Logachev; VOPROSY II{ONOMLKI, J~ 81) 1 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Economic Development of Moscow Evaluated (VOPROSY EKONOMIKI, June 81) Planning Strategy Discussed, by V. Bitunov Economic Matters Examined, V. Byslkovskaya Importance of Planning Territorial Orga.~ization of Productiaoz (A. A. Nadirov; NARODNOYE KHO~'aYSTVO AZERBAYDZIiADTA, Mar 81) 24 - a - [III - USSR - 3 FOUO] APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400050020-0 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/49: CIA-RDP82-00850R040400050020-0 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PLA2~IQI~1G Ai~iD PLAN IMPLr:MENTATION MEETI'.JG ON SCIENTIFIC-TECH23ICAL PROGRAMS 1t~VIEI+IED Moscow VOPROSY EKONOMIKI in Russian No 6, Jun 81 pp 154-155 [Article by L. Peshkova and V. Logachev: "Problems of Forming Scientific- Technical Programs for the llth Five-Year Plan"] [Text] Ia Moscow in January 1981, the Scientific Council for the Problem "Or~aniza- tion and ~conomics of Scientific-Technical Research and Developm.ent" ~~f the State Committee for Science and Technology held an expanded sesaion at which queations were discuased on the forming of acientific-technical programs for the llth Five- Year Plan. There participated in the seas�ion pereonnel of the State Conmiittee for Science and Technology, Goaplaa US5R, Gosatroy USSR, goaplane and academies of sci- ences of the union republics anQ USSR tninistries and departments. In accordanc4 with the "Easic Directions of USSR Economic and Social Development for 1981-1985 and the Period to 1990," broad uae ie being provided for epecial-Roal complex progranLS in the aolution of concrete scientific-technical problems. The uae of the special-goal program method makes it possible to concentrate financial and material resources and scientific cadres on the attainment of end goals, to ensure integration. in the solution of set tasks, to speed up int.roduction of the results of scientific research and development and to take into consideration int~errelations among sectors. The reports and speeches emphasize that a special feature af the use of the.special- goal pro~ram method in planninp, of the development of science and technology during the llth Five-Year Plan is that the programs~conatitute the system. Moreover, they act as an integral part of state~plans of economic and social development. A close connection was pointed out between national-economic (social-economic and regional) and scientific-technical programs,inasmuch as the ~reater portion of the latter are included in one degree or anather in national-economic pro~rams. A further development of the special-~?oa1 pro~ram methad of planz~in~ in the current five-year plan is also is sinpling out of s~~ecial-~oal complex pro~rams f.ror: amon~ scientific-technical pro~rams that provide for lar~e-scale realization of the most significant scientific-technical achievements. The end aim _of these programs is concrete production volumes and industrial inteqration of new ec!uipment and tech- nology, manufacturing processes, new methods of or~anization of production, manufac- ture and use of already assimilated (in process of assimilation) pro~resaive types of products and tectmolo~y for already created facilities. 1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400050020-0 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-04850R000400050020-0 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY A list of scientific-technical and also new special-goal complex programs has been set for tlie current five-year plan by the State Cornmittee for Science and Technolog;?, Gosplan USSF., Gosstroy USSR and the US~R Academy of Sciences with the participation of USSR ministries and departments and the co~ncils of ministers of the union republics. In t:~e development of all the types of programs, a mai.or role was played by the Com- plex Program of Scientific-Technical Progress for the Period to the Year 2000, wh~ch presents a unified conception of the development of science, t~chnology and produc- - tion in the form of a system of interrelated forecasts. In distinction to the lOth Five-Year Plan, all the pro~;rams for the current five-year plan have been approved by tile State Committee for Science and Technology ~ointly caith Gosplan U:~SR and the USSR Academy of Sciences. Of exceptionally imriortant si~- nificance for operation of the programs is the designation, of directors of programs and individual targeta and the organization of coordinatinp councils for individual pro~rams and coordinating departments at leading acientific-research institutes (at the State Committee for Scfence and Technology there has been prepared a statute on the coordinating depastment). Program directors compile work plane for programs and ex- ercise control over their implementation. In accordance with the decree of the Cf'SU Central Committee and the USSR Council of - Ministers (July 1979), expert examinatian bf indiwidual work operations performed according to the programs is obligatory (at th~ State Committee for Science and Tech- nology a draft has been prepared for an ~ppropriate atatute). At the conference, there were examined alao questions of material stimulation of work performed according to the programs. Ma~or interest in this connection was - provoked by a report on the work experience of the Ministry of Electrical Equipment Industry. Problems of material-technical provision for the scientific-technical programs were also discussed. The existing syetem of material-technical ~upport for the programa is imperfect. The need evidently exista to develop a special-goal complex program for material-technical support of the pro~rams. Of ma~or importance for ~~he opera- tion of the programs is the Uprant ProRram; it constitutes a social-economic experi- ment on the scale of several apecial-Ro^.1 complex programs. Within the framework of the Uprant Yrogram, provision has been ;aade for the development, ex~aerimental verifi- cation and introduction of a complex of ineasures for improvin~ the planning and ad- ministratio~ of scientifi r technical progress in the country. The programs include basic tarRets whi~h in turn are included in the State Five-Year Plan�af Economic and Social Development of the USSR: the creation and start-up of facilities with new equipmen~t and new px~oduction operations based on pro~reasive manufacturin~; processes; the development and introduction of new types and systems of high-production machines and automated equipment, new types of buildings and structures, effective meaas of inechanization and automatian for comprehensive ec;uip- m~nt of all sectors of the national economy. Basic assi~nmenta designate leadir,g min- istries and departments, responsib].e for the creation and assimilation of new equ�.p- net and technology, provision of the required scientific and technical level, coor~� dination of the work of coexecutors, ma~erial-technical support, exercise of control . 2 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400050020-0 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2407/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400450020-4 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY over the fulfiliment of the entire com~lex of work and timely statement of account- ability. Basic assignments also indicate the most important indicators of the technical-economic level of production and concrete examples of new equipment and technology, time of beginning and assimilation in production of new products and introduction of progressive technology with a breakda~m by years of the five-year plan and estimated cost of the work. The provided assimilati.on of new types of equipment and technolog}r by the programs is at tt~e same time taken into account in the plans for introduction of new equip- - ment and in production plans. COPYRICHT: Izdatel~stvo "Pravda", ~~Voprosy ekonomiki", 1981 7697 CSO: 1820/223 3 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400050020-0 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400050020-0 L FOR OFFICIAL USE ONL~ REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF MOSCOW EVALUATID P].anning Strategy Discussed ~ Moscow VOPROSY EKONOMII:I in Russian No 6, June 81 pP 15-22 [Article by V. Bitunov: "Comprehensive Planning for the Economic and Social Development of Moscow] [Text] One of the most important directions in improving planning is the combining of its sector and territorial aspects. The es~ence of territorial planning lies in insuring the comprehensive development of the national economy in each economic region on the basis of an opttmum sector structure. Two trends can now be discerned in territorial planning. The first is associated with planning for the comprehensive development of relatively large regions within the territorial context, and the second is connected with regulating urban agglom- erations. In the peri~~ of developed socialism the role of the cities--one of the most important forms in the socioeconomic and territorial organization of society--ob~ectively grows. "....Cities are centers of the economic, political and spiritual life of a people and are the motive force of progress."* Lenin"s appraisal of the role of the city in the life of a society is particularly apropos today. During the years of soviet power the urban population of the USSR has more than quintupled. Urban dwe~lers now make up 63 percent of the country's total population.** During the course of the planned socialist transformations the . network of new cities has been expanded and the national economic potential of old cities has grown and been renewed. By the mid-seventies a network of population centers had been created. Its basis was formed from cities with populations of more than 100,000. By 1977 the number of such cities had topped 250. Their * V.I. Lenin. Complete Collected Worka;, Vol 23 p 341 - "SSSR v tsifrakh v 1979" [The USSR in Figures, 1979], Statistika Publishing House 1980, p 7 _ ~ FOR OEFICIAL USE ONLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400050020-0 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/49: CIA-RDP82-40850R040400054020-0 FOR OFFICiAL USE ONLY ' economic base is growing rapidly. Almost two-thirds of the countr~'s fixed capital is in the citi.es. Direct expenditures on the development of city construction during the lOth Five-Year Plan exceeded R100 billion.* The prop.ortion bf the total population living in major cities is growing substantially. Some 53 million people, or mnre than one-fourth of the urban population o` the USSR, are now concentrated in 46 cities (with populations of more than SOC,000). The substantial growth in the urban population is creating the objective basis for deepening the approach to revealing the essence and features of the urban aspect of socialist planning, Insuring the correct combination of the interests of individual enterprises and organizations and sector and departmental interests while effecting comprehensive planning in a major city is associated with the implen?entation of specific planning functions. A city is a unified national economic complex that requires harmonious and balanced development. However, there is still no organ that draws up the plan for a city in its entirety and for its entire national economic complex. As a result, plans for the comprehensive development of cities frequently suffer from a one-sidedness. In the period of developed socialism the range of problems in which the urban aspect of territorial planning is paramount is widening. In terms of their nature, problems like public health, improving labor and everyday con3itions and trade and personal services, the more complete satisfaction of cultural requirements ~ and so forth are largely territorial, but their resolution calls for comprehensive urban development. A number of questions connected with further improving the comprehensive development of the country's major cities are now being resolved. In recent years appropriate methodologic materials have been compiled. Interesting experience in comprehensive planning for the development of the urban economy has been gained in Leningrad, Sverdlovsk, Donetsk and other large cities. Moscow is making a substantial contribution to the resolution of this question. ? The constant concern of the CPSU and the Soviet Government and the help from all the Soviet people have made it possible in a short time historically to make _ Moscow a very large economic, administrative and political, scientific and cultural center. At the 26th CPSU Congress the task was set of transforming Moscow into a model communist city. The role of the plan in solving this task is great. Moscow's history is eloquent testimony to the great possibilities opened up by socialism and the planned system for managing the economy for the comprehensive development of cities. The statistics show that during the years of Soviet power the volume of gross industrial oucput in Moscow has increased by a factor of 23U and labor productivity by a factor of 36. The development of Moscow's industry represents the path of radical reconstruction of old enterprises and the creation of new and modern enterprises, the introduction of the achievements of science and technology into production, the modernization and replacement of equipment, * D. Khodzhayev. "Kompleksnost' - glavnoye napravleniye v zastroyke gorodov" [Complextty--the Main Direction in the Construction of CiLiesJ, PLANOVOYE KHOZYAYSTVO No 8, 1976 p 43 5 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400050020-0 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/49: CIA-RDP82-40850R040400054020-0 FOR QFFIC[AL USE ONI.Y and the provision of ineans of inechanization and automation. Moscow's share of industry in the all-union output of automob~.les, machine tools, construction materials, instruments and other very important products is high. It is the country's largest transportation 3unction. Each year the Moscow railroad junction handles more trran 72 million tons of various kinds of freight; each day it deals with about 1.6 million passengers using the commuter lines and the long distance railroad linea; while each year more than 30 million tons of freight and 5.2 million passengers a~ce transported on the waterways. Each day more than 20,000 passengers fly out of Moscow's four airports t~ the cities of the Soviet Union and abroad. Moscow is a gigantic construction site wher~e each year about - R3.5 billion of capital investmenf~s are assimilated. The scope of housing construc*_ion is enormous. Each year 4 million to 4.5 million square meters of housing are built. In Moscow, much experience has been gained in plarining--exper~ence that is characteri2ed by considerable changes in the system and methods of planning and that intraduces qualitatively new elements into them. These changes are of a periodic nature, since planning methods must be stable for definitQ and suffici~:ntly long periods of time (several years); this is essential for the most complete realization of the tasks that have been set. Moreover, the methods, indicators and forms of planning should be unified. Along