JPRS ID: 10328 WORLDWIDE REPORT LAW OF THE SEA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82-00850R000500030037-3
Release Decision: 
RIF
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
November 1, 2016
Sequence Number: 
37
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
REPORTS
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00850R000500030037-3.pdf239.41 KB
Body: 
APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000500030037-3 N'Ult Uh'H't(:IAL V5~ ONLY JPRS L/ 10328 17 February 1982 Woridwide R~ ort p LAW OF THE SEA CFOUO 1 /82) FBIS FOREIGN BROADCAST INFORMATION SERVICE FOR OFFICIAL U5E ONLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000500030037-3 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2407/02109: CIA-RDP82-00854R000500030037-3 NOTE JPRS publications contain informat~on primarily from foreign newspapers, periodicals and books, but also from news agency ' transmissions and broadcasts. Materials from foreign-language sources are translated; those from English-language sources are transcribed or reprinted, with the original phrasing and other characteristics retained. Headlines, editorial reports, and material enclosed in brackets are supplied by JPRS. Processing indicators such as [Text] or [Excerpt] in the first line of each item, or following rhe l.ast line of a brief, indicate how the original information was processed. Where no processing indicator is given, the infor- mation was summarized or extracted. Unfamiliar names rendered phonetically or transliterated are enclosed in parentheses. Words or names preceded by a ques- tion mark and enclosed in parentheses were not clear in the original but have been supplied as appropriate in context. Other unattributed parenthetical notes within the body of an item originate with the source. Times within items are as - given by source. The contents of this publication in no way represent the poli- cies, views or attitudes of the U.S. Government. COPYRIGHT LAWS AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS REPRODUCED HEREIN REQUIRE THAT DISSEMINATION OF THIS PUBLICATION BE RESTRICTED FOR OFI'ICIAL USE ONI.Y. APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000500030037-3 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000500030037-3 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY JPRS L/10328 17 February 1982 ~ WORLDWIDE REPORT LAW OF THE SEA (FOUO 1/82~ CONTENTS NEAR EAST AND NORTH AFRICA , TNTERNATIONAI, P_FFAIRS Hague Court Hearing Arguments on Tunisian-Zibyan Sea Fr~ntier (Samir Gharbi; JEUNE AFRIQUE, 21 Oct 81) 1 SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA GHANA Brief s No Illegal Fishing Claimed 3 - a - [III - WW - 136 FOUO] APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000500030037-3 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000500030037-3 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS - HAGUE COURT AEARING A1tGUMENTS ON TUNISIAN-LIBYAN SEA FRONTIER Paris JEUNE AFRIQUE in French No 1085, 2~ Oct 81 p 27 [Article by Samir Gharbi: "A Smell uf Gasoline"] [Text] The final Tunisian-Libyan confrontation ~ver delimitation of their maritime frontier began on 16 September in The Hague I:~cernational Court of Justice (ICJ). Contrary to those that preceded it in 1976 and 1977, in the open sea, this has been verq peaceful. Indeed, courtesy is compulsory in t'his "world tribuna}." established by the United Natians in 1945. une of the common expressions is "our eminent adversaries," another, "fra.te~nal. countries." But to get to this poiat it took 8 years of fruitless negotiations (1968-1976) followed by a serious crisis. At .last resort, on 10 June 1977 wisdom won out: the two governments signed a compromise calling on the ICJ to decide not only "the principles and rules of international law which could be applied" to delimit the continental shelf, but also to "clarify a practical way" which w~ould enable experts of the two countries to mark the frontier "without any difficulty." The matter is very complicated. Zt tnvolves scientific, economic, ~uridical, and historical fac.ts. The issua is especially crucial to Tunisia since the dis- puted zon.e is rich in petroleum. Following the 10 June 1977 compromise, each government submitted to the court the documents necessary to support its position (memorandum, counter-memorandum, and reply). It is the oral proceediags now underway in The Hague, with an initial stage of Tuxiisian testimony (16-25 September) and Libyan testimony (beginning 29 September) before 15 independent judges, presided over by Nigerian Tasltm Olawale Elias. On the two sides there are some 50 lawyers, experts and advisers; British, American, French, Italian, Tunisian, and Libyan. Most are outstanding specialists in international law, geology, geomorphology, physiagraphy, and oceanography... Some are from such prestigious uninersities as Cambridge, Paris, Geneva, Cornell, etc. But the positions they are defend'ag aa ~~'~.alf of the government which hired them result in very different lines Ieading from the land border point, Ras A~dir. The Tunisian representatives maintain that the predominant orier~tation of Tunisia's coast is east. Aowever, the opposing party considers this direction to be "abnormal" and "accidental " and thus negligible in relation to its own 1 FOR OFFICIAL USE OIYLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000500030037-3 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000500030037-3 .�vn vrri~.t~?t, UJC. U1VLY "continental perspective." The Libyan r.epresentatives, referring back 7 million - years, afiirm that the thrust of the African continent has been north. Since it is the orientation that will decide the lin~ of the maritime frontier, it is easy to see that the difficulty of the debate is more than geQlogical. Deliberatione The key to the issue has appeared in the Libyan delegation's intention to counter the natural extension of Tunisia to the east by disregarding the islands of Djerba and Kerkennah. The Tuni.sian solution of several oblique lines is also rejected: these lines pass in front of the Libyan coast...In contrast, the Libyan representa- tives propose a line proceeding due north which passes...in front of r_he Tunisian coast. It is up to the court to decide which are the most pertinent natural and juridical factors. Ics deliberations wil; last at least 1 to 2 months. The judgment, which will be voted by absolute majority of the judges, is "compul- sory, definitive, and without appeal." The two parties, within a period of 3 months (once renewable), will be required to proceed themselves to marking the line. In case of deviation from, or failure to respect, the judginent, the ICJ rules provide that recourse is possible to the Security Council, "which has power - to recommend ur decide on appropriate measures." _ . . _ I ~ : o. ,~~j~i,,~~~Q' ~:~,W-i '.l I '~b/:' ~y{y:M y'~ ~ . - .Y~J~~~~ . .1�~:.~ OPfL'YTELI.EfiIA i ~ `YA1 t c'. ~ , 4.,~.r^9':ti ~';'rjl~_'.~ i ~ s,}.. ~ o r ~ - MA1TE I :~w ~-~t;.,~,~.~~ 4~ o ~ ~a:t'~c' >J~;; ILES ~ C ,a~� , ; r . PELAGIE �'~`~,;;T".f'`~i,K":4i~ ~ :1r::^ ~'G'.'+~ ~ ~ o .T..~~f~~~~'~,(a �~~i~i'..~,t~ ~~f~~,;~~,~3+.,. q:~ . ,h v.. ~ ~ ti' ~d~. r~~~_~' ` ~~ES ~y~~c~~'"..N:~'~.~,,``~'>''~~~ERKENN Delimitation - Frt~a~r~~r,~~~~'~~~'~' ~~~i oD proposee ~ 'M}~~.'~ ~ par la Libye ~ ` .t r~i ~ L~ ~ GOLFE OE GABES y ~ ~ i~';::~`' ILE DE OJERBA Delimitation ~ �+.':A~~ ~ proposee ~ ' ~ ~ , ~ par la Tunisie ?~!;:y~ '~~}~'~~,�ai- ~ h L�:t~i.~~~ .~'~?r~.i-~yy.' t ~~~.~}',h'. ~ � fr:p~j~ilql`"''~ ? f ~,'?�~~Z.~L~7Le� � rfy..:~~~..`~~~,;~,~`~~~' ;~-~`~s� �1~�:._a ~J~t,~~r'~3~d~~~.~~'i'y~~'T~'~'i`i - ~ . f ~iy P;~a~~~ ~~~~F ~J,Y~yt~T~.'~~r C'~ y~~. I I : 1 . 1( I "a t~jl *~l'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ : t/ f 4 ~ 4 t-`_=' 4~ r ~t 1~af i� ~ i:,~ y.f ~ i~ 7-, y a' , y~.~P, t:� r ~ ..Mw-. y,l'!r~~ ~ a ~~C ~ ~t`(~ t~ t ~ ~ ti .y'~ ' r+~ ~'...R. r ~ ~ .*~M i f ~ r . ~ ti!'~~~ ,~X ~~:%~.t~C.*~ j�~+ ' ~ Ip N,.~... y ^,y~ ~3~ ay Yj' � W p~ COPYRIGHT: Jeune Afrique GRUPJIA 1981 9920 - CSO: 5200/5000 2 FOR OF'FICIAL USE ONLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000500030037-3 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000500030037-3 FOR OFFICIAL USE ON:.~C' ' GHANA BRIEFS NO ILLEGAL FISHING CLAIMED--Following the information that the Ghanaian Navy had arrested the Ivorian tuna fishing vessel "Laurent," we have received the following letter from the Ets Chevannes-Merceron-Ballery company in Concarneau: "As the administrators in charge of this vessel, we would like to note that it was not 'seen fishing in the country's territorial waters,' as had been announced. The vessel was arrested on 14 December at 2315 hours GMT when it had stopped for tech- nical reasons approximately 60 miles from the Ghanaian coast. We w~re able to prove that the vessel had not been fishing during the 48 hours preceding the arrest and the vessel was released on 31 December." [Text] [Paris MARCHES-TROPICAUX ET - MEDITERRANEENS in French No 1888, 15 Jan 82 p 147] COPYRIGHT: Rene Moreaux et Cie Paris 1982. CSO: 5200/5624 END 3 ~ FOR OFFIC[AL USE ONLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000500030037-3