PROPOSED METHOD FOR HANDLING THE T/O ASSIGNMENT AND PAY FOR EMPLOYEES ON EXTENDED SICK LEAVE PENDING DISABILITY RETIREMENT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82M00531R000400270008-8
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 22, 2005
Sequence Number: 
8
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 26, 1973
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82M00531R000400270008-8.pdf64.92 KB
Body: 
DCI/~ G7 ~- r Y~ ~/ ~~j -1/ D~ ,Approved For Release 2005 00531 R00040Q0~"~- ``~ ~ ~ ~--~" ~ ~ SEP X973 MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Intelligence Deputy Director for Management and Services Deputy Director for Operations Deputy Director for Science and Technology c,XSepu~ty to the Director for the Intelligence Community Director of National Estimates General Counsel " Inspector General Legislative Counsel Proposed Method for Handling the T/O Assignment and Pay far Employees on Extended Sick Leave Pending Disability Retirement 1. The 30 June exodus of employees has again disclosed a situation which from time to time has caused confusion among and between components. When an employee enters into extended sick leave status pending disability retirement, it may be for as long as a year or more. His salary continues during the entire period. In most instances, the employee is already charged against the T/O of his parent Career Service. However, a problem arises when an employee is assigned outside his parent Career Service and enters extended sick leave status. The component to which the employee is assigned is often reluctant to continue to carry the employee on its rolls and pay his salary. Since such employees are neither charged against Agency ceiling nor against Career Service Grade Authorization promotion headroom), the only factor of concern is salary. 2. We find that of the 64 staff employees now on extended sick leave pending disability retirement only four are slotted outside their parent Career Services. I-Iaving examined the equities of this situation, it seems to me that the Agency practice should be that employees in Approved For Release; 2005/05/ 3 ~CI~- : [~F~~M005318000400270008-8 Approved For Release 20~~/05/~ti3 ~`CAA-RD~8~M005318000400270008-8 this status will be carried on the T/O's of their parent Career Services. I would appreciate your review and consideration of this matter and receipt of your views by 12 October. Es/ John F. Flake John F. Blake Director of Personnel ~-~~. d N a Etc s .:,..._. _. ,; Approved For Release 2005/05%23 :CIA-F2D~8~M00531 8000400270008-8