A COMPARISON OF THE DRAFT OF PHYSICAL SECURITY STANDARDS FOR(Sanitized)CONTROL FACILITIES WITH USIB-D-9.1/20 DTD 1973

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82M00591R000200100036-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 1, 2003
Sequence Number: 
36
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 4, 1980
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82M00591R000200100036-1.pdf180.6 KB
Body: 
Approved For Ref se 2003/10/16 : CIA-RDP82M00591 RQQ 200100036-1 DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE Security Committee SECOM-D-161 4 April 1980 MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Secretary DCI Security Committee a SUBJECT: A Comparison of the Draft of Physical Security Standards For APEX Control Facilities with USIB-D-9.1/20 dtd 1.973 1. As you are aware, the Working Group to revise USIB-I)-9. 1/19 (Physical Security Standards for Compartmented Information) recently submitted a draft of a new standard. As an aid to its evaluation the old and new standards have been compared. Listed below are what I consider to be the principal differences between the two documents. As you will note, there is not a, perfect match-up, section by section, between the old and new. However, the general format: is the same. 2. The differences as I see them are: Policy Statement Page 1, line 10. - The new atandard extends coverage to electric and electronic equipment located in APEX Facilities (not addressed in the old standard) Page 2, line S - The new stan,lard requires the accreditation authority, in waiver situations, to notify the ACF manager where his facility fails to meet standards (new requirement). Approved For Release 2003/10/16 : CIA-RDP82M00591 R000200100036-1 Approved For Rel a 2003/10/16: CIA-RDP82M00591 R040200100036-1 Section II - Perimeter Construction Cr Operating Mode Domestic Open Storage, Ground Level with Waiver Page 11-4, Line 20 Domestic continuous operations. Ground level Page II-5 Line 23 Domestic closed storage above/below ground. Page 11-7 Line 20 Domestic continuous operations. Above/ below ground Page 11-8 Line 09 Overseas closed storage ground level Page TI-10 Line 5 Overseas continuous operations. Ground level Page IT-10 Line I5 Requirements New Standards Building Access Control 24 hr. guard force alarm system Overseas Sec. area construction Domestic Sec. area Guard response Lockable containers or tested. evacuation/destruc- tion plan in lieu of con- tainers Domestic Sec. area Class 6 safe alarm system Domestic Sec. area. Lockable containers or Tested evacuation/destruc- tion plan in lieu of safes. Overseas Sec. area Alarm Class 5 Safe Overseas sec. area GSA approved. safe or tested evacuation/destruc- tion plan in. lieu of safe Requirements Old Standards Same except that only building perimeter wall, (not interior) of the ACF must meet overseas sec. area stds. Domestic sec. area Guard response Lockable containers Domestic Sec. area Class 3/6 safe alarm or twice per hour guard patrol. Domestic sec. area Lockable containers Overseas Sec. area Alarm Class 3/6 safe or Domestic Sec: area alarm Class 5 safe Common ACF/ bui lding Perimeter walls only to overseas sec. area stds. GSA approved safes or, i, lieu tested evacuation/ destruction plan - adegui-~ guard response Approved Igor Release 2003/10/16 : CIA-RDP82M00r91 R000200100036-1 2 Approved For Rele a 2003/10/16 : CIA-RDP82M00591 R0QW00100036-1 Operating Requirements Mode New Standards Overseas closed storage above/below ground. Page I1-10 Line 5 Overseas Sec. area Class 5 Safe alarm Overseas continuous operations above/below ground Page II-10 Line 15 Overseas Sec. area Alarm or alert system GSA approved safe or evacuation/destruction plan. Requirements Old Standards Class S safe guard patrol an hour or class 3/6 safe alarm pproved. GSA safe or tested evacuation/ destruction plan. Section III - Security Alarm stems b. The new standard removes the requirement of the old standard that security alarm systems must meet GSA's Interim Federal Specifications for alarm systems. It also removes the Atomic Energy Commission (Now NRC) as the official govern- ment test facility for alarm systems. c. The new standard upgrades transmission line security one class - Top or "high line security" of the old standard is now Class B line security under the new standard. d. Page III-l, line 21 and Page 111-2, line 15. Domestically, if for reasons beyond the control of the ACF manager an in-house or government controlled alarm system is impractical or impossible then specified commercial service may be substituted. This opeion was not available under the old standard.. STAT Approved For Release 2003/10/16 : CA-RDP82M00591 R000200100036-1 Approved For Roo ase 2003/10/16: CIA-RDP82M00591 RQ&0200100036-1 Section V - Miscellaneous Ph _sical Security Standards a. Page V-1, line 21 - The new standard for the first time addresses security procedures to be observed. in connection with the use of electronic word processing equipment in ACF's. b. Page V-2, lines 10 and 23. The new standard for the first time addresses two new work situations described as "Temporary Secure Areas". Annex A - Vault Specificatioons_ a. Page A-1, line 9. Concrete vaults have been slightly strengthened by increasing the thickness of the floor and ceiling line 19. The new standard requires a Class Page A-2 h , . F door for all vaults. The old standard allowed an option of a Class 6 or Class 5 door. Distribution: Orig - Addressee 1 - SECOM Subj 1 - SECOM Chronot/ SECOM IIns 4 Apr 80 STAT Approved For Release 2003/10/16 : CIA-RDP82M00591 R000200100036-1