NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

COMPARTMENTATION OF HS/CSG

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP83-00764R000300110026-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 19, 2001
Sequence Number: 
26
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 12, 1969
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP83-00764R000300110026-9.pdf168.51 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP83-00764R000300110026-9 8 1 C R E T 12 June 1969 EMORANDUM FOR ; CS Historical Board BBJHCT : Compartmentation of HS/CSG REFERENCE My Memo Dated 10 June, Same Subject 1. This memorandum will try to clarify the rather "black and white" impression of paragraph 7 of referent memo, in order that members of the Board will be better armed to discuss this and make a decision. (One Board member has al- ready called me about this.) 2. My solution in paragraph 7 is fairly drastic, and, perhaps, unfeasible to legislate. It was, however, based on the fact that no other directorate has prepared a collection of documents or cards to put into US/HC, and, as far as I am aware, has not given its consent to either do this, or once h ei e.- v yf sn ` r F with what we had before, a DDP collection in EJ e n n~,Il1ta HS/CSG under This was the rationale behind my "solution" in paragrap 7. 3. A perfectly satisfactory alternative (if the other directorates agree to the idea and have material to contrib- ute to HS/HC) would be to havel in charge of four 25X1 (one for each directorate) se ctions of index cards and documents. In and my opinion, it would 25X1 be perfectly workable to have a epa ate safe for each direc- torate, and to have him administer these four collections which could be physically located in his office? The key to the success of this from our point of view is that it will always be administered by a DDP officer. Otherwise, a sepa- rate DDP collection, e.g., HS/CSG, would be imperative. 4. Another factor in this question is location of the cards and documents. It seems to me that were I from another directorate located in Langley that I would be much more E C R E T GRGUT I Excluded ira i a ta; Fa: d3waryaci.13 L".1 de~i~slf;cviis~t ~? Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP83-00764R000300110026-9 Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP83-00764R000300110026-9 inclined to consult documents and cards that were physically located in Langley rather than in Rosslyn. We find it very time-consuming, and hence tend to put off a number of jobs that require going to Langley simply because of the time fac- tor. We also know that many others in Langley do not come to our office for the same reason. Hence, it makes more sense to me for other directorates to establish their collections where they are located rather than in Key Building, but this is not problem; my problem is to maintain security for DDP ma. teria . 5. Thus, as I have stated in paragraph 3, there is a perfectly satisfactory alternative to complete separation of /CSG if it is agreed to that a DDP officer will always be 25X1 in charge. What makes me worry about this is that Chief, Historical Staff said at a meeting I was at the other day that he felt it would be perfectly all right to replace with a l officer. I advised him that this would not be live_ ly to have the concurrence of CSBB or the DDP, but I can't say whether this point swayed him. Executive Secretary CS Historical Board S E C R E T Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP83-00764R000300110026-9 Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP83-00764R000300110026-9 ^ UNCLASSIFIED ^ usE'?'b'F'iir ^ CONFIDEAL SECRET ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SUBJECT: (Optional) FROM: EXTENSION No. 203 Key Bld . Executive Secretary DATE CS Historical Board 12 June 1969 TO: (Officer designation, room number, and building) DATE OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom RECEIVED FORWARDED INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment,) 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 3? 2M 610 USEDITIONSus ? SECRET ^ CONFIDENTIAL [] INTERNAL Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP83-00764R000300110026-9