(UNTITLED)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 22
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: March 8, 2000
• Sequence Number: 23
• Content Type: MISC

IDENT I'f4WJe WFo9FRef~ e zJOT07Q9/0~~~hh:ee~~--l _q6l > ~ R anch of the
Trechvision is"es~1~J for the
preparation of requisitions and, maintenance
of a daily record. of expenditure for Tech
Division, PTOS. .
ACTIVITY CODE III, B, (d) 13 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Security
..-
WS'B
ivision
EVALU.AT I ONI : DATE :
What is (area our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
-Do_(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?.
s c o c e y r 4o NitiraTo% nx e
Nat's C_ v, i '1 o t S C' e _V,
(,eo~W4.a~~c+ S
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity? - I
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes A No
Do you fee-1 that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why? -
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
4
important than this one?--Yes No If so,-- haLf
se d by OS that you feel is more
Is there any activity not now being pur
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 TDE~TIF h B d Services. Branch of the
1 for processing
~~FRe'Ia~IV1~(~Oy/U9/1~3i`tt'B 4
turn-ins of obsolete, excess and uneconomically
repairable material for Tech Division, PTOS.
ACTIVITY CODE": III, B, (d) 14 COMPONENT: . OS/PTOS/Technical Security
ivi.sion SB
EVALUATION: DATE : V
25X1A
o you e
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes, No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, hour?
t is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies)'of this activity?
D f el the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No)(
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No x
I f s o , how?
important than this one?.-.Yes NoA If so, -what.
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 Apppproved For Rele 220p 09/Q R 0 RPPQ79g~21$
IDENTIFICATION OF ACVI Tieri~i ?a i$nch of the
Tech Division is responsible for maintaining
stock control procedures for Tech Division,
PTOS.
ACTIVITY CODE: III B d) 15 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Security
- on J
EVALUATION:
J_ V
DATE :
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? YesNo
Who is (are) the beneficiaryties ) of this activity?
\-\`P- o~.liS~n~ acvo~ OS
)?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No )(
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No_ If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes
No < If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued wit u'
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? ._.Yes NoX If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
Approved For Release 2000/09/0
anch ?e`~`i~ji`~qrmo n i t o r s the
industrial contracts for the repair and
modification'of-Tech Divisions specialized
electronic equipment.-
ACTIVITY CODE': III, B, (d) 16 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Security
LVAUUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) '1the reference (s) still in force' Yes Y Na
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still neces ary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes Nox
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No__ If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
if so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one,?-Yes. No__,>~ If so, ,what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
Division _-
DATE:
 S
TI t~ y h anch of the
EN F
ei1
,0~p B ~.e n t s to effect
shipment of Tech Divisions electronic
supplies and equipment.
important than this one?._-Yes No_ If so,.-what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
ACTIVITY CODE': III2 B, (d) 17 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Security
EVALUATION:
1vision
DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
4 o
~Iyljl
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes N No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly.?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes NoX If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Briefing and Services Branch of the
Approved For Release 2000/09/02'eEtA-R6?BB3;B.@082BRQ0~7D0 20 $agbrate and
aligns the standard equipment of the 25X1A
Tech Divisor, PTO-S, .
ACTIVITY CODE aII, B,--L4,) ; 18 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Securi
Division/BSB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) ' for this activity? Date(s)?
CJ~~ Q1A~
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes A No'
11iho is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity:
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes___ No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? YesNo
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred.
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued wit o?t
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No/ If so, ldhat?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACT~ICT/0Y?The Offic onent responsible
Approved For Release 00 9%02 FgkA- Pp 64 ?~R g_ at Headquarters
for all Agency employees departing for
overseas duty.
25X1A
ACTIVITY CODE': III, B, (d) 1 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Security
ivisionIBSB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
n G1 S 3
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes ?v No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how? -TwIC- A 'k~o,.~~lc -kste~u~ a w~ee(~~~`I
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More. properly? Yes No L,- If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No / If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is More
i
mportant than this one? ._.Yes No V/ If so,.-what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4 .
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
Approved For Release 2000/09/02
25X1A
ACTIVITY CODE': III, B, (d) 2 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Security
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes- No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
VN d FerSot-cUre.~
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No /
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes ' No /
Can the activity be done more efficientlys costly? Yes art No__
If so_ how? A - . 11 -.1
--r
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more, efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what? -
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant rity? Yes No
I f t
ow?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 I DENT I F'AFA '691heWaUUdi3 d9/02
ACTIVITY CODE': III, B, (d) COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Security
Djvjsion/BSB
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes i/ No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies)'of this activity?
bDO
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes V No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes _ No?
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No y
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes Noy If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? -Yes No_ If so,-what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 :
25X1A
ACTIVITY CODE III, B, (d) 4 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Security
Division SB
EVAT U.:T I ON: DATE :
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date (s) ? 25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes ?/ No
Who is (are) the ben eficiary(ies) of this activity?
DDO
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No.
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes / No
If so, how? ~v T 1~v~ e C ~u QA -k\-, e
S S I~do -a~3
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No / If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
.significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one?.-Yes No .~/ If so,-what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 I DENT I FAWfff to WhgZk6 0/09/
25X1A
ACTIVITY COD III B d) S -COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Tech ical oncuri~y
C - -
n1TF
EVALUATION:
for this activity? Date(s)?
What is (are) our reference(s)
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes ~/-
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
No
25X1A
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes NO T
NQ
the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes N
Do(es)
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes o
If so, how?,
the
}70u f ee.l that responsibility for e activity should beNttra/f erred Yes to another OS component or to another Offce?
If so, where and why?
nt do the activity more. efficiently? Less Costly?
Can another component NoIf so, which component and why?
More properly? Yes
questionable in the light of
Does the activity incluNeo anything so, what?
Watergate? Yes
odiscoetinued without
this activity be reduced in scope/size
Can
significant effect on overall agency security.
If so, how?
ursued by OS that you feel is More
Is there any activity not now being P T If so, -what?
Yes No
/
_ ._ _
important than this one
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 T DENT I' $1WJeW*Mkdfease
ACTIVITY CODE": III, B, (d) 6 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Security
n ivision
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s)2&F6& this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes / No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies)'of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No-
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes _7 No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? YesNo,,_
If so, how?.
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No_j.,,,,
If so, where and why? .
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes ..No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No i/ If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
I f so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one?-Yes No If so, :?rhat?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 I DENT I FF A~J N`FFR IIV16a& 9/
B, (d) 7 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Security
ACTIVITY CODE: 1112
Division/B613
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No L,- If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes NoIf so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No e/
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? ._.Yes No_fr If so,.- what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
EVALUATION: DATE
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes L" No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
25X1A
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes r/ No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes / No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?.
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACT
TV TTyy
V
2
Approved For Release O
Obk8/02 : A- 9O0&nF OWOD@902#ip
for presenting the monthly
Security Course,
i b 1 e
ACTIVITY CODE": III, B, (d) 8 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Security
EVALUATION:
xvision
B'
DATE:
-
.
"
What is (are) our reference(s) fo
te(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force?
Who is (are) the b
efi
i
Yes
L/
No
en
c
ary(ies) of this
activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes 1- No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transfer red
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes-yam No /7f sn _ where an ,. h
?
y
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No / If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No /
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is More
im
ortant th
hi
p
an t
s one?._.Yes No e' If so,-what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
Approved For Release 2000/09/02
25X1A
ACTIVITY CODE': III, B, (d) 9 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Security
Division
EVA. UAT I ON : DATE :
What is (are) our reference (s) for this actin; t1r? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes Al No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes ' No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No ,/
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No i/ If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No t
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? -Yes No - 1,/ If so, i?:hat?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020.023-4
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible
Approved For Release 2000/09102fd~1A~flfl 3R0Uc@7OGO22AM 231- I -Security
Equipment Course (Ten times a~year)
ACTIVITY CODE': III2 B, (d) 10 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Security
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? YesNo
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies)'of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes /__ No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes L-,' No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No /
Do you fee-l that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No / If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No V If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one?.-.Yes No -~/ If so,-what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible
Approved For Release 2000/09/Q' rCI F?g@AlqQQR2?IRQOg7jR9W23-4Security Officer's
Course (twice a year),
ACTIVITY CODE": III , B, (d) 11 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Technical Security
EVALUATION: DATE :
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes r/. No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes V No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No -
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why? .
More properly? Yes ..No / If so, which component and why?
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No / If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No y
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? ...Yes No _ t/ If so,--what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 IDEXTIFICATION OF Ase OJJ 10 ~~C~ FI ~ 2 b~ d`1 gd,bnent responsible
Approved For Releaseo~'"M~ ing a presen a on on -Physical Security
equipment 4t the Finance Course.
25X1A
k, w ; -11-1.2 B, (d) 12 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Te~ch-ni r-al
L1 V 1J1VIL/i5JL5
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes j/ No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do (es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes C ' No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No r/
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No V If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without _
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes Nom/
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued y OS that you feel is more
i
mportant than this one?...Yes No If so,.-what?
V _
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 25X1A
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02
IMM ML. 0700020023-4
II. FUNCTION
Provide training to Agency groups in the field
of physical security equipment.
I. MSecurity Course (monthly)
to be pr X e at Hqs.
J. Various tutorials and
briefings. Time and frequency epen upon
request.
ACTIVITY
A. Physical Security Equipment Co
(Ten times per year) held at
B. Physical Security Officer I 25X1A
(Two times per year) held at
C. Finanri- C- ght times per 25X1A
year) held at
D. Various tutorials. Time and frequency
depend upon requests.
III. FUNCTION
Provide logistical support services for the
Technical Security Division.
ACTIVITY
A. Preparation of requisitions and maintenance
of a daily record of expenditures against appropriate
allocations.
B. Prepare turn-ins of obsolete, excess and
uneconomically repairable materiel.
Approved For Release 2000/09/O~A?- >T8L000700020023-4
 Approved For Release 2000/0
C. Maintain stock control procedures.
D. Initiate and monitor industrial contracts
for the repair and modification of specialized
electronic equipment.
E. Prepare documents for shipment of
electronic supplies and equipment.
25X1A F. Repair, calibrate and align standard
=equipment.
j( L II) a Il r9 IT
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020023-4
 ^ UNCLASSIFIED El USE ONLY U cunriutniiAL L_J 3c~RCI
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional)
25X1A
FROM:
EXTENSION
NO.
Po icy an 4 F W
5311
DATE
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
ldi
DATE
OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
)
ch comment
ft
l
ng)
bui
INITIALS
.
er ea
umn a
to whom. Draw a line across co
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
OS/PTOS/Technical
Security Division/B
B
Under Objective B57104 the
will re-
it
f S
y
ecur
Office o
2.
view and validate all Offic
of Security functions,
effe
activities . . . to ensure
3.
tiveness, economy and effi
ciency. The attached docume
tones
il
es
represent two m
4.
under that objective. Mile=
stone l; the components
tions
f
i
h
d
unc
r
e
t
identifie
5.
and activities. Milestone
2 was establishment of a
these
ti
l
f
ng
ua
or eva
format
6.
,,,activities. It is re-
quested that Briefing and
i
h
ew
rev
Services Branc
7.
the attachments and:
a) Certify that there are
s
ti
on
no deletions/correc
B.
additions to be made to
the previous listing
ffi
ce
submitted by your o
9.
b) Review the Identificatio
of Activity statement on
h
eet to
each evaluation s
10.
ensure it fully equals
to the comparable activi
from your offices listin
11.
c) Use the attached format
to evaluate each individ
12.
activity.
13.
14.
15. "
"
"
" "
"_
"
""
"
OUS~
^ UNCLASSIFIED
FORM 61 O USED RE ONS
^ CONFIDENTIAL
(
SECRET
UnSE ONLY
3
-62
-
t