IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: THE OFFICE OF SECURITY RESPONSIBLE FOR

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 19
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: March 9, 2000
• Sequence Number: 25
• Content Type: MISC

Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700Q20025-2
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security response e tor
conducting liaison with all DDO area
divisions and the DDO Technical Requirements
25X1A Officer in establishing and validating
_ priorities.
ACTIVITY CODE: III, B a) 1 COMPONENT:OS/PTOS/Technical Security
Divisdon/OB
DATE:
EVALUATION : z V mw 9 J
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
' Yes ,K No
(are)
Who is (are) the benericiary ~i.es) o= L,( No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No x
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No__
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, wrhat?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible
for maintaining continuing liaison with
other government agencies and selected
re resentatives of commerical industry on
25X1C matters and equipment.
ACTIVITY CODE: III, B, (a) 9 COMPONENT:OS/PTOS/Technical Security
25X1A Division O
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference (s) still in force? Yes__ No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes K No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes ' _( No
Can the, activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If s, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No__
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes NoIf so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is.there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this'one? Yes If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
 A roved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
I'DENTIFICA'TION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible
for developing Ag-ency Technical Security
policy regarding the use of various types
of telephone systems, music systems, type-
writers, intercoms and other office equipment.
ACTIVITY CODE: III, B(a) 10 COMPONENT:OS/PTOS/Technical Security
Division O
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s for this act' ' ? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes_ No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes ) No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes .x. No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No_K If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include an thing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No-7 If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes N.o If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
 Approved For Release
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
25X1A .
ACTIVITY CODE: III, B, (a) 11 COMPONENT:OS/PTOS/Technical Security
Division
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity.
-b D. 0
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes ' No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes IL No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No4
If so, how? -
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes NoX
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include an thing questionable in the
Watergate? Yes No? If so, what?.
ght of
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
.,important than this one's Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
 Approved For Release 2
IDENTIFICATION OF ACT.rM:
ACTIVITY CODE: III, B (a) 14 COMMPONENT:OS/PTOS/Technical Security
Division
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No___
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?.
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you. feel -i5 mor_e?
important than this one? Yes No If so,: what?.
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2-
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
 = Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2 responsible
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: fThe office ot or providing escort ttq-maintenancespersonnel
working in the DCI complex and inspection
of the areas of interest following such work.
ACTIVITY CODE: III B a 15 OMPONENT:OS/PTOS/Technical Security
Divi.s-ion
EVALUATION:
DATE : Z. q
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes_ No
f this activity?
Who is (are) the bene.Liciary(ies) o
Do you feel the activity is still necessary?
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still
Cal. the activity be done more efficiently or
If so, how?
25X1A
Yes J No x No
necessary? Yes
less costly? Yes_2~ _ NO__.__
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity shhould beNttransfe red
to another OS component or to another Office?
If so, where and why? , ~ . o~. ~,'.__a , ?_t,.,~ _ Q C '
~
-
-
v v ?
IN 0_V__y_ V_"/ 4 (J/~~~cJ r . -
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently?. Less costly?
More properly? Yes_ No- If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include an thing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?.
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes_____ NoLK-
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS. that you feel is more
what?
so
y No If
,
.
important than this one. Yes
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
 Approved For Release 200,
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
ACTIVITY CODE: III, B, (a) 13 COMIPONENT:OS/PTOS/Technical Security
Division 0
EVALUATION: DATE:
Z ofAd,w 7
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference (s) still?in force? Yes
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this
C- -Z
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes)_ No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yesp No
1.
?
Tf
s
ow
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes_ No
If so, where and why?
S-e. 12 z , 3 i Ca> ' S
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include an thing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
.Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes _ No If so,.what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
activity?
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02: CIA-RDP83B00823R00070~0; -3sible
ty componen
f S'ecuri
.
for providing daily inspection of the offices
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: or Office o
of the DCI and other senior personnel of
the Agency.
ACTIVITY CODE: III B (a) CONIPONENT:OS/PTOS/Technical Security
Division 0
DATE
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference (s 2115X1A ff~or this activity? Date(s)?
still in force? Yes No
Is (are) the reference(s)
1~Tho is (are) the beneficiary (ies) of this activity?
7 c2
you feel the activity is still necessary? neYes esssY:NoYes No Do y No-
If Do (es) the beneficiary (i. ~es) feel it is still Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes so, how? j w
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should beNttransferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes
If so, where and why?
Less costly?
r component do the activity more ,efficiently?
N? If so, which component and hy?
Can another p
Yes
R More properly? _
questionable in the light of
incluNeo If anything so, what?.
Does the activity
Watergate. Yes
n this activity be reduced in scope/size discontinued without
Ca yi Yes-
erall Agency
significant effect on ov
If so, how?
ur ied by OS that you feel is more
Is_there any activity not now being PT If so, what?.,
e? Yes No
important than this on
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
e~Z4. 6
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
 25X1A
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
Next 2 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020025-2
 2000/09/02: CIA pP ff a00070002.g024&ET
^ UNCLAS @ffl ved In Weep
USE ONLY
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional)
FROM:
EXTENSION
NO.
Mr.
XPOP"
P
olicy
x5311
DATE
10 March 1975
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
DATE
OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
INITIALS
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
1.
A-Chief, Technical
Under Objective B57104 the
Security Division/nT
Offi
f S
i
ill
ce o
ecur
ty w
re-
view view and validate all Offic
of Security functions,
acti
iti
t
ff
3.
v
es...
o ensure e
e
tiveness, economy and
C~~s
efficiency. The attached
doc
m
t
4.
u
en
s represent two
milestones under that objec-
tive. Milestone 1, the
id
if
d
5'
components
ent
ie
their
functions and activities.
Milestone 2 was establishme
f
f
f
6'
o
, a
ormat
or evaluating
these... activities. It is
requested that Technical
S
i
Di
i
i
7.
ecur
ty
v
s
on review
the attachment and:
a) Certify that there are
B'
no deletions/corrections
additions to be made to
the previous listing
9.
submitted by your office
b) Review the Identificatio
of Activity statement on
10
each evaluation sheet to
ensure it fully equals
to the comparable activi
11.
from your offices listin
c) Use the attached format
to evaluate each individ
12.
activity.
13.
'' ae C -4 P1J 4W *
7 ~91.//l4h - ti - 04>c ///3'
-
.
14.
l ev ,e w (;*r . J 4ie i gt
T
6
15.
Jl
3O62M 610 US EDITIONS SECRET CONFIDENTIAL 1:1 USE ONLY ^ UNCLASSIFIED