INTERROGATION BRANCH ACTIVITIES

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 25
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: March 9, 2000
• Sequence Number: 30
• Content Type: LIST

-t iL
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R0007000
OVERT DESK
1. Conduct staff pre-employment polygraph examinations
2. Conduct staf.f.EOD polygraph examinations
3. Conduct RIP (Specific) polygraph examinations
4. Conduct EOD briefings of minor males prior to 19th
birthday
5. Conduct EOD briefings of minor females prior to 18th
birthday
6. Conduct straight interrogations and interviews ,j
7. Conduct contractor/vendor pre-assignment polygraph
examinations
8.' Conduct pre-assignment polygraph examinations of
DIA assignees
25X1A
Conduct special request interrogations and polygraph
examinations for other agencies
25X1A 12. Conduct pre-assignment polygraph examinations of GSA
assignees
INTERROGATION BRANCH ACTIVITIES
Approved For9O 1O9 3 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 ' $~?~i~s1j 3~i ~.~i~iY ~ ~.21i as 3 -a. ?t I
Approved For Release 2000/09/03: CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
25X1A
RESEARCH c TRAINING ACTIVITIES
TraiiVnew polygraph examiners in polygraph testing
procedures and interrogation techniques, and insure
their basic familiarity with standard o ing 25X1A
procedur
s in Headquarters
e
20 Kee informed of developments in of gra
related fields and insure that all useful haspects
of such information are made available to examiners.
3. erv as
'Al
Serve as primary IB spokesman for OS and OTR courses
requiring treatment of polygraphy.
Assisto ORD/DDS&T in polygraph-related research and
bring&to ORD attention areas of potential research.
6. Perform or direct research needed by IB when appropriate
services are not available from other components.
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6-
 Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP8.3B00823R000700020030-6
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible
for conducting staff pre-employment
polygraph examinations.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) i COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes / No
Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes V' No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the acti ty more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No__ If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No ,,JJ If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued withou
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No_./
If so, how?
Is there any.. activity not now being- pursuecjf by OS that you feel is more
important thah.this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R0007000.20030-6
IDE.NTIFIUATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible
for conducting staff EOD polygraph examination
.ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 2 COiNIPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
EVALUATION: DATE:
What.is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes I No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No-
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be tran ferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No v"
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No / If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No r/
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more
important than. this .one? Yes No , . I'-; so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 AATved For 2'000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
IDENTIFIC . The Office of Security component responsible
for conducting RIP (Specific) polygraph
examinations.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 3 COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
EVALUATION: DATE:
What.is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies)-of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No /
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes / No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be tra ~ferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No /
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the ac ity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes .No t" If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? YesNo_~
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursue b OS that you feel is more
-important than this one? Yes No so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 IDENTIADDroved For R,IIela~sle~?000/09/03 :CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
The Office of Security component responsible
for conducting EOb briefings of minor males
prior to 18th birthday.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 4 COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
EVALUATION: DATE :
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still: in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies)'of this activity?
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes IV No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes V No
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trarlysferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No rd
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the actity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No= If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include an thing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No/ If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinue without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not- now being pur.su~d by OS. that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No / IT. so,' urhat?
. Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : -CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 .
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The office of Security component responsible
for conducting EOD'brie.fings of minor females
prior to 18th birthday.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 5 COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
feel the activity is still necessary? Yes L/ No
D
o you
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes '/ No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No /
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trap erred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the acti ity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No J If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include an/thing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursue ''by OS that you feel is more
?
r
so, what
-important than this one? Yes No I
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: In special situations and by direction of
the office of Security-Interrogation Branch
will conduct non polygraph interrogations
and interviews.
ACTIVITY CODE:
I, B, (c) 6
COAIPONENT.OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
ll necessary: Yes No
t
i
Do you feel the activity is s
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies)'feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for Office? activity Yes should beNttran,?ferred
to another OS component or to another ~~
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the ac'' vity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include a hing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho
? Yes No e?
rit
y
significant effect on overall Agency secu
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursuecllby OS-.,..that- you feel is more
.-.important than.-this one? Yes. No I so,,what?
.Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 Apppproved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible
for conducting contractor/vendor pre-assign--
ment polygraph examinations.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 7 COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
EVALUATION:
DATE:
What.is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes _,/ No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? YesNo
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so,' how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transfe-xi ed
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
S
Can another component do the activ"xy more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes NoIf so, which component and why?
Does the activity include any
Watergate? Yes iNo
g questionable in the light of
If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No_
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued)f"OS.that you feel is more
impor
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible
for conducting pre-assignment polygraph
examinations of Defense Intelligence Agency
assignees.
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) 'of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes / No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes . No_-
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trans rred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No / If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include any ping questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No V If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
..._Is there any activity not. now being pursue ~by OS-that you feel is more
_important than. this one?. Yes No I sa what?,
11
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 IDENTIFI~I~ivO~~ 00/09/03 CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 .
The Office of Security component responsible
for conducting pre-assignment polygraph
examinations of Intelligence Community
assignees.
EVALUATION: DATE:
What.is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity?
If so, how?
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No ,
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes rtj No
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No
If so, where and why?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No=
More properly? Yes No V/ If so, which component and why?
Can another component do the acti, ity more.efficiently? Less costly?
Does the activity include anything questionable in
Watergate? Yes
No ~/' If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
important than.this one? Yes No If so, what?
=Ls there 'any activity riot now being pursue ?Z,;1;1 %/
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(' s) of this activi y?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes z No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No V-,*'
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No y If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in'the light of
Watergate? Yes No 1 If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued withou-t
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being purse `d by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No V If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 25X1A.
IDENTIfiI'CA"1 ONO O rACT IW9
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 15
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes r., No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes i No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes Nom
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the ac~vity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include any hing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not. now being pursue ?by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If. so', what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 A Droved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030--6
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible
for conducting polygraph examinations at
Headquarters. _
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 16 COAIPONENT?OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
EVALUATION:
What.is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Z) e~7
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes V No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes i No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No V If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes Nov' If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with
ou3t
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is. there any. activity' not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more
important than.this one? Yes No 11 so, what?.
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 Approved F R ~$ ZOOO1/tp9/0 CIA-RDfP83B00823R000700020030-6
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIN : 'Phe uft1ce o ecurity component responsible
for preparing staff studies, position and
policy papers as directed by Chief,
Interrogation Branch and Chief, Security
Support Division.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 17 COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
EVALUAT-I ON :
DATE:
What.is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
tt 1
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary (ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes V No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yeses
If so, how?
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be tra sferred
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Can another component do the acti-ity more efficiently? Less costly?
Does the activity include' a~}~thing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No~O If so, what?
significant effect on overall Agency security?. Yes No
If so, how?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with,ut
.I-s?there any. activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No Ii so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 Apppproved For Release 2~0 25
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVIT :
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 18 COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
7,0
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes 7 No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No_.%
5X1A If so how?
5,/-o eat
5X1Ao you feel that response i y or the activity
e transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in
Watergate? Yes No_ If so, what?
the light of
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more..
important than - this one? Yes No IT -so!, what?.
Approved For Release 2000/09103 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 Apppproved For Release 2000/09/03 CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:. The Interrogation Branch is responsible for
training'new polygraph.examiners in polygraph
testing procedures and interrogation
techniques, and insure their basic familiarity
with standard o eratin rocedures in
Headquarters 25X1A
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) .19 COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
EVALUATION: . DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes -- No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity. be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trans red
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activ} ty more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No / If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anyng questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity'be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without/'"
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursuey OS that you feel is more
Approved For Release 2000/09/03: CIA-RDP83B00823R00.0700020030-6
 Approved For Release 2000109/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
IDEN1IFICATION OF ACTIVITY: Interrogation Branch is responsible for
keeping informed.Qf developments in polygraphy
and related'fiel-ds and insure that all useful
aspects of such information are made
available to examiners.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 20 COMIPONENT?OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
EVALUATION:
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies)'of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can. the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes. No /
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office.? Yes Nom`
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No / If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anyt 'ng questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 roved For Release 2000109/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: Interrogation Branch serves as the primary
spokesman for Office of Security and
Office of Training.in.courses requiring
treatment of polygraphy.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 21 COMIPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
EVALUATION:
DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes o
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes
,-
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
No
No
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be -transf-red
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activ' y more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes Nof so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anyt in-g questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No_ If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any. activity not now being pursued OS that you. feel is more
imr~nrtant f-1-- +1.4,
-j-~.~ .. .,.a. .. ..aqua ?. 111 J, V11G. Ilu 114U / _.!= SO, IN
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 Approved For Release 2000/09/03 CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component that assists
ORD/DDS&T in polygraph-related research
and brings to ORD attention areas.of
potential research.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 22
EVALUATION:
COiNIPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch
DATE:
What.is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes Y No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No_.,,~
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No`~ f so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anyg questionable in-the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued withou
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
s. there any activity not now being. pursue OS that you~feel is more,
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
 ^ UNCRRW3Y For Fee Q0O/09/03 CIA-RD M 3BOO823R0007OOO2OO3O-6
USE ONLY CONFIDENTIAL f-l SECRET
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
Under Objective B57104 the
Office of Security will re-
view and validate all Offic
of Security functions,
activities... to ensure effe -
tiveness, economy and effic -
ency. The attached documen s
represent two milestones
under that objective. Mile-
stone 1, the components
identified their functions
and activities. Milestone 2
was establishment of a for-
mat for evaluating these...
activities. It is requeste
that Interrogation Branch
review the attachment and:
a) Certify that there are n
deletions/corrections/
additions to be made to
the previous listing
submitted by your Office
b) Review the Identificatio
of Activity statement on
each evaluation sheet to
ensure it fully equals t%
the comparable activity
from your offices listin
c) Use the attached format
to evaluate each individ al
activity.
j ( A VJ
L'P
FORM ROOOMAAA
3.62 610ARveffc~rElfase N
USE ONLY UNCLASSIFIED