INTERROGATION BRANCH ACTIVITIES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
25
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 9, 2000
Sequence Number: 
30
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
LIST
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6.pdf1.15 MB
Body: 
-t iL Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R0007000 OVERT DESK 1. Conduct staff pre-employment polygraph examinations 2. Conduct staf.f.EOD polygraph examinations 3. Conduct RIP (Specific) polygraph examinations 4. Conduct EOD briefings of minor males prior to 19th birthday 5. Conduct EOD briefings of minor females prior to 18th birthday 6. Conduct straight interrogations and interviews ,j 7. Conduct contractor/vendor pre-assignment polygraph examinations 8.' Conduct pre-assignment polygraph examinations of DIA assignees 25X1A Conduct special request interrogations and polygraph examinations for other agencies 25X1A 12. Conduct pre-assignment polygraph examinations of GSA assignees INTERROGATION BRANCH ACTIVITIES Approved For9O 1O9 3 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 ' $~?~i~s1j 3~i ~.~i~iY ~ ~.21i as 3 -a. ?t I Approved For Release 2000/09/03: CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 25X1A RESEARCH c TRAINING ACTIVITIES TraiiVnew polygraph examiners in polygraph testing procedures and interrogation techniques, and insure their basic familiarity with standard o ing 25X1A procedur s in Headquarters e 20 Kee informed of developments in of gra related fields and insure that all useful haspects of such information are made available to examiners. 3. erv as 'Al Serve as primary IB spokesman for OS and OTR courses requiring treatment of polygraphy. Assisto ORD/DDS&T in polygraph-related research and bring&to ORD attention areas of potential research. 6. Perform or direct research needed by IB when appropriate services are not available from other components. Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6- Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP8.3B00823R000700020030-6 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible for conducting staff pre-employment polygraph examinations. ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) i COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch EVALUATION: DATE: What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes / No Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity? Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes V' No Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No If so, how? Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No If so, where and why? Can another component do the acti ty more,efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes No__ If so, which component and why? Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of Watergate? Yes No ,,JJ If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued withou significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No_./ If so, how? Is there any.. activity not now being- pursuecjf by OS that you feel is more important thah.this one? Yes No If so, what? Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R0007000.20030-6 IDE.NTIFIUATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible for conducting staff EOD polygraph examination .ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 2 COiNIPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch EVALUATION: DATE: What.is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes I No Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity? Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No- If so, how? Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be tran ferred to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No v" If so, where and why? Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes No / If so, which component and why? Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of Watergate? Yes No If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No r/ If so, how? Is there any activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more important than. this .one? Yes No , . I'-; so, what? Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 AATved For 2'000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 IDENTIFIC . The Office of Security component responsible for conducting RIP (Specific) polygraph examinations. ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 3 COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch EVALUATION: DATE: What.is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies)-of this activity? Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No / Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes / No Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No If so, how? Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be tra ~ferred to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No / If so, where and why? Can another component do the ac ity more.efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes .No t" If so, which component and why? Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of Watergate? Yes No If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without significant effect on overall Agency security? YesNo_~ If so, how? Is there any activity not now being pursue b OS that you feel is more -important than this one? Yes No so, what? Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 IDENTIADDroved For R,IIela~sle~?000/09/03 :CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 The Office of Security component responsible for conducting EOb briefings of minor males prior to 18th birthday. ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 4 COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch EVALUATION: DATE : What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still: in force? Yes No Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies)'of this activity? Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes IV No Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No If so, how? Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes V No Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trarlysferred to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No rd If so, where and why? Can another component do the actity more.efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes No= If so, which component and why? Does the activity include an thing questionable in the light of Watergate? Yes No/ If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinue without significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how? Is there any activity not- now being pur.su~d by OS. that you feel is more important than this one? Yes No / IT. so,' urhat? . Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : -CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 . IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The office of Security component responsible for conducting EOD'brie.fings of minor females prior to 18th birthday. ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 5 COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch DATE: What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity? feel the activity is still necessary? Yes L/ No D o you Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes '/ No Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No / If so, how? Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trap erred to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No If so, where and why? Can another component do the acti ity more.efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes No J If so, which component and why? Does the activity include an/thing questionable in the light of Watergate? Yes No If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how? Is there any activity not now being pursue ''by OS that you feel is more ? r so, what -important than this one? Yes No I Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: In special situations and by direction of the office of Security-Interrogation Branch will conduct non polygraph interrogations and interviews. ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 6 COAIPONENT.OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch EVALUATION: What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity? ll necessary: Yes No t i Do you feel the activity is s Do(es) the beneficiary(ies)'feel it is still necessary? Yes No Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No If so, how? Do you feel that responsibility for Office? activity Yes should beNttran,?ferred to another OS component or to another ~~ If so, where and why? Can another component do the ac'' vity more. efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why? Does the activity include a hing questionable in the light of Watergate? Yes No If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho ? Yes No e? rit y significant effect on overall Agency secu If so, how? Is there any activity not now being pursuecllby OS-.,..that- you feel is more .-.important than.-this one? Yes. No I so,,what? .Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 Apppproved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible for conducting contractor/vendor pre-assign-- ment polygraph examinations. ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 7 COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch EVALUATION: DATE: What.is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity? Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes _,/ No Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? YesNo Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No If so,' how? Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transfe-xi ed to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No If so, where and why? S Can another component do the activ"xy more efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes NoIf so, which component and why? Does the activity include any Watergate? Yes iNo g questionable in the light of If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No_ If so, how? Is there any activity not now being pursued)f"OS.that you feel is more impor Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible for conducting pre-assignment polygraph examinations of Defense Intelligence Agency assignees. ACTIVITY CODE: EVALUATION: COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch DATE: What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) 'of this activity? Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes / No Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes . No_- If so, how? Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trans rred to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No If so, where and why? Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes No / If so, which component and why? Does the activity include any ping questionable in the light of Watergate? Yes No V If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how? ..._Is there any activity not. now being pursue ~by OS-that you feel is more _important than. this one?. Yes No I sa what?, 11 Approved For Release 2000/09/03 CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 IDENTIFI~I~ivO~~ 00/09/03 CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 . The Office of Security component responsible for conducting pre-assignment polygraph examinations of Intelligence Community assignees. EVALUATION: DATE: What.is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity? If so, how? Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No , Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes rtj No Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No If so, where and why? Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No= More properly? Yes No V/ If so, which component and why? Can another component do the acti, ity more.efficiently? Less costly? Does the activity include anything questionable in Watergate? Yes No ~/' If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how? important than.this one? Yes No If so, what? =Ls there 'any activity riot now being pursue ?Z,;1;1 %/ Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No Who is (are) the beneficiary(' s) of this activi y? Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes z No Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No If so, how? Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No V-,*' If so, where and why? Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes No y If so, which component and why? Does the activity include anything questionable in'the light of Watergate? Yes No 1 If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued withou-t significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how? Is there any activity not now being purse `d by OS that you feel is more important than this one? Yes No V If so, what? Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 25X1A. IDENTIfiI'CA"1 ONO O rACT IW9 ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 15 EVALUATION: COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch DATE: What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes r., No Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity? Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes i No Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes Nom If so, how? Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No If so, where and why? Can another component do the ac~vity more efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why? Does the activity include any hing questionable in the light of Watergate? Yes No If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how? Is there any activity not. now being pursue ?by OS that you feel is more important than this one? Yes No If. so', what? Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 A Droved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030--6 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible for conducting polygraph examinations at Headquarters. _ ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 16 COAIPONENT?OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch EVALUATION: What.is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity? Z) e~7 Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes V No Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes i No Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No If so, how? Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No If so, where and why? Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes No V If so, which component and why? Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of Watergate? Yes Nov' If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with ou3t significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how? Is. there any. activity' not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more important than.this one? Yes No 11 so, what?. Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 Approved F R ~$ ZOOO1/tp9/0 CIA-RDfP83B00823R000700020030-6 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIN : 'Phe uft1ce o ecurity component responsible for preparing staff studies, position and policy papers as directed by Chief, Interrogation Branch and Chief, Security Support Division. ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 17 COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch EVALUAT-I ON : DATE: What.is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)? tt 1 Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No Who is (are) the beneficiary (ies) of this activity? Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes V No Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yeses If so, how? Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No If so, where and why? Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be tra sferred More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why? Can another component do the acti-ity more efficiently? Less costly? Does the activity include' a~}~thing questionable in the light of Watergate? Yes No~O If so, what? significant effect on overall Agency security?. Yes No If so, how? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with,ut .I-s?there any. activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more important than this one? Yes No Ii so, what? Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 Apppproved For Release 2~0 25 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVIT : ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 18 COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch EVALUATION: DATE: What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)? 7,0 Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity? Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes 7 No Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No_.% 5X1A If so how? 5,/-o eat 5X1Ao you feel that response i y or the activity e transferred to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No If so, where and why? Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why? Does the activity include anything questionable in Watergate? Yes No_ If so, what? the light of Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how? Is there any activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more.. important than - this one? Yes No IT -so!, what?. Approved For Release 2000/09103 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 Apppproved For Release 2000/09/03 CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:. The Interrogation Branch is responsible for training'new polygraph.examiners in polygraph testing procedures and interrogation techniques, and insure their basic familiarity with standard o eratin rocedures in Headquarters 25X1A ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) .19 COMPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch EVALUATION: . DATE: What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity? Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes -- No Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No Can the activity. be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No If so, how? Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trans red to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No If so, where and why? Can another component do the activ} ty more.efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes No / If so, which component and why? Does the activity include anyng questionable in the light of Watergate? Yes No If so, what? Can this activity'be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without/'" significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how? Is there any activity not now being pursuey OS that you feel is more Approved For Release 2000/09/03: CIA-RDP83B00823R00.0700020030-6 Approved For Release 2000109/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 IDEN1IFICATION OF ACTIVITY: Interrogation Branch is responsible for keeping informed.Qf developments in polygraphy and related'fiel-ds and insure that all useful aspects of such information are made available to examiners. ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 20 COMIPONENT?OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch EVALUATION: DATE: What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies)'of this activity? Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No Can. the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes. No / If so, how? Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred to another OS component or to another Office.? Yes Nom` If so, where and why? Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes No / If so, which component and why? Does the activity include anyt 'ng questionable in the light of Watergate? Yes No If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how? Is there any activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 roved For Release 2000109/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: Interrogation Branch serves as the primary spokesman for Office of Security and Office of Training.in.courses requiring treatment of polygraphy. ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 21 COMIPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch EVALUATION: DATE: What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity? Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes o Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes ,- Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes If so, how? No No Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be -transf-red to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No If so, where and why? Can another component do the activ' y more.efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes Nof so, which component and why? Does the activity include anyt in-g questionable in the light of Watergate? Yes No_ If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how? Is there any. activity not now being pursued OS that you. feel is more imr~nrtant f-1-- +1.4, -j-~.~ .. .,.a. .. ..aqua ?. 111 J, V11G. Ilu 114U / _.!= SO, IN Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 Approved For Release 2000/09/03 CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component that assists ORD/DDS&T in polygraph-related research and brings to ORD attention areas.of potential research. ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (c) 22 EVALUATION: COiNIPONENT:OS/PSI/Interrogation Branch DATE: What.is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)? Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity? Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes Y No Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No If so, how? Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No_.,,~ If so, where and why? Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly? More properly? Yes No`~ f so, which component and why? Does the activity include anyg questionable in-the light of Watergate? Yes No If so, what? Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued withou significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how? s. there any activity not now being. pursue OS that you~feel is more, Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020030-6 ^ UNCRRW3Y For Fee Q0O/09/03 CIA-RD M 3BOO823R0007OOO2OO3O-6 USE ONLY CONFIDENTIAL f-l SECRET ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET TO: (Officer designation, room number, and building) COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) Under Objective B57104 the Office of Security will re- view and validate all Offic of Security functions, activities... to ensure effe - tiveness, economy and effic - ency. The attached documen s represent two milestones under that objective. Mile- stone 1, the components identified their functions and activities. Milestone 2 was establishment of a for- mat for evaluating these... activities. It is requeste that Interrogation Branch review the attachment and: a) Certify that there are n deletions/corrections/ additions to be made to the previous listing submitted by your Office b) Review the Identificatio of Activity statement on each evaluation sheet to ensure it fully equals t% the comparable activity from your offices listin c) Use the attached format to evaluate each individ al activity. j ( A VJ L'P FORM ROOOMAAA 3.62 610ARveffc~rElfase N USE ONLY UNCLASSIFIED