IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: PROCESSES SPECIAL ACCESS APPROVALS ON

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 31
• Document Creation Date: December 15, 2016
• Document Release Date: October 24, 2002
• Sequence Number: 33
• Content Type: MISC

7s;e;lAS5g~81 100?g~P6 79"9 3d s on
IDENT IFICAT Nrc dX@T f $e 2 1c140
Agency-funded contractor personnel.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A,
b) 1
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
EVALUATION:
DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s).still in force? Yes
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
I&CB
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes
No
V
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes / No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes Noj.,~
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trans rred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activ y more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the
Watergate? Yes No / If so, what?
ght of
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho}it
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No pursued
so, what?
X
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION OF gCTTVIITY: "Processes industrial security approvals
Approved For a ease 20Qc11~97e; 9 RI~~~4qQL08?~~gg0700020033-
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b), 2 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
.Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
.Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes y No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No.
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly?. Yes No
If so, how? .
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trans erred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?.
Does the activity include an ing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued withoy:c
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes Na /
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being purs by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No ue If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 ID ENTIFICATIb)r?yec, tgq sp Z@t)Zla$/I-?e#IA4tbP B60923 61d-f0o o -f ovals
at the Secret level.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b)?, 3 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Dates}?
Is (are) the reference(s) . still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary (ies) of this activity?
is still necessary? Yes / No-
Do you feel the activity
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes / No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly?- Yes No/
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility
to another Office?yT Yes be\~ora~ erred
to another OS comp
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the act' ity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No V If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include any hing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho t
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No v
b
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATTIOi~ ~"
Appr v W F Jig eY2O02?lrP@ S0>iAsROR~~B019Z?j 00 gg22 3's3t of f
approvals on contractor personnel
with staff-like access to Agency
installations.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b),, 4 CflMPnNTPMT. nc/DcT/r~
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference (s) still in force? Yes
Who is (are) the beneficiar N?
y(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes t__ No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes ;/ No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly?_ Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transf rred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the act' ity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include ar~,ything questionable in the
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
ght of
Can this.activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with
ou
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued/by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No - If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 I DENT IF I CAX~AvFI~aIs~O(~7s es for
Agency-funded contractor personnel.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b)., 5
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s)-still in force? Yes
.Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Ye nTNo
If so, how? T
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trans erred
to another OS component or to another office? Yes
If so, where and why? tiro
Can another component do the actiyaity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More Properly? Yes No // If so, which component and why ?
Water Q ? o ~... ~i~,iaaulC in zne IZght of
bate Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes ~T ~/
If so, how?
.o
Is there any activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes
No If so, what?
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION OF A1TLVTTY: `Processes codeword ac es is
Approved ForRetease 2 11~(~7en~ ~~i ~ onne1. _
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b), 6 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference (s) .still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the act xity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No / If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable. in the
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
ght of
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho t
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No /
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No /If so, what? .
Approved For Release 2002/1.1/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: Processes Visittorr-NNo c tt bad requests.
Approved For a ease 2002/11/07: CIA-RDP83ti0Q823 bs004l0020033-3
I, A, (b),, 7
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s). still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes -/ No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No /
If so, how?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the acti ity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include any ing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No 7If so, what?
Can this.activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No ,S
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what? .
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION OF A~ TVIITY ? P~,s 1 ? its tact
Approved F-or a ease 2~ p1 ``~{tt A- 30.3RSOeb~~0102003
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b)?, 8
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s).still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes 1-110
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary?. Yes -/ No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes Nom
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transfe red
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the acti ity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes . No/ If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No_ If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho}xt
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No /
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being purs by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No ue If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 30ffice
IDE~ITIFICAT?AON OF T~Ie'205 -yPRff30b6 9
pproved~~r u o r-cessing Guard
cases under the Facility Access Program.
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s).stili in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity?
T4CB
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes____ No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes/- No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the a vity more. efficiently? Less costly?
. More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include any hing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
Approved For Release 2002/1.1/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION OF TTTVTTTY: s i b 1 e com on nt wi#hi,n,,e Office
~pproved orRefease 2C~ 1s1 u197' 0 intenance
personnel cases under the Facility Access
Program.
ACTIVITY CODE:
A, (b) 10 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference (s) still in force? Yes No
..Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes N-o.-,-;
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No /
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trans erred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
ore properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Can another component do the acta'vity more. efficiently? Less costly?
Does the activity include an thing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho t
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATIApproved ForRefea a 211:rCIIp~R(3oOff i
rceCe
personnel cases under the Facility Access
Program.
ACTIVITY CODE:
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference (s) .still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes____ No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes N'ol, 7
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the actVity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
ght of
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
/
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being purs by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No ue If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION OF T22
Approved c~r R se'206 5 i_'},1i1 ffl1?biJMTP,0'd6Mk20(tJSQ3 Office
o security tor processing Services
personnel cases under.the Facility Access
Program.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b)~, 12
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date (s) ?
Is (are) the reference(s).still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes Nom
If so, how?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No /
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes / No
If so, where and why?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trans erred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho t
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes ~;o/
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursue' by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No/ If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION OF TLVIITY? Res i e e Office
Approved or a ease 2a(2/~(r;Rg~21((~f2-ion
individuals working in.non-government
buildings leased by the Agency.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b),, 13
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s)-still in force? Yes No
.Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No_j~
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trans rred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the ac` vity more. efficiently? Less costly?
. More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?.
Does the activity include a thing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes NoZ If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without'
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursue y OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION C~ f-RO-FS6 RDP88B01I8~a1R00 Db42O013$a Office
Appov. o Security for.
y process in individuals working
25X1-A
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b) 14
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s)-still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes t/ No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes_j' No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trans erred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the act~ty more. efficiently? Less costly?
. More nroziPrl v? vac N
Tr , .
o
Does the activity include any hing'questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes To L/
If so, how? '
Is there any activity not now being purse by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATTA( r d aT hiI TasYe;.2 qw: 1 y- 60 R( 0 30ffice
or ecuri or r i on
individuals working
25X1A
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A,
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s)-still in force? Yes No
.Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
25X1
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be tranerred
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
. More properly? Yes No _/ If so, which component and why?.
Does the activity include an thing questionable in the light of
.Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being purse by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes -No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION OFCTVfTY: si~? e co Approve or e ease 2d i trz'-`1' gR4W 0 Q; ion
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
I~CB
DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No /
If so, how? _
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes / No
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trans erred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the act ity more.efficiently? Less costly?
. More properly? Yes No/ If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the
Watergate? Yes No4/ If so, what?
ght of
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with t
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No with
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No y~If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
individuals working
0
 IDEDITIFICATApproYtd~~7kYlilsye:20$2/1]PlOsb?"D B00&281'?0Od 0at31ie3Office
of Security for processing cases on
individuals working on a part-time basis
at the Credit Union.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b)~, 17
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes Nor
T-F cn },nTa?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes/ No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No fr
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the ac `'vity more. efficiently? Less costly?
. More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include a thing questionable in the light. of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued withgrl't
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursue
d/ly OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No c/ If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/1.1/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 2 P1WO '3IWR?PtM 1SR6 ; ?d ?-30ff ice
IDLNTIFICATI~
of Security for. processing s on
25X1A
i-ndividuals to be contacted by the
I I
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b)-, 18 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
T&CB
EVALUATION:
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity?
? Yes a No
Do you feel the activity is still necessary
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes / No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be t Lferred
Office? Yes No
h
er
.to another OS component or to anot
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the ct' ity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes Noa If so, which component and why?.
Does the activity include any hing questionable in the
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
ght of
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No a/
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION OFACTLVIITY?
Approve or a ease
25X1A
25X1A
qP9PW1iri4W-6
I?11
Onf ice
individuals to be used by the
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b)~, 19 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity?. Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s). still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
-t~~~
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necess
ary? Yes V No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No,~Z
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be tran (erred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the act' ity more. efficiently? Less costly?.
More properly? Yes No/ If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No V If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with t
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being purse by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/1.1/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION OF CTLVITY:
Approve or a ease
t responsible
0c
ACTIVITY CODE: I, All (b)~, 20 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be traferred
. More properly? Yes No/ If so, which component and. why?
Can another component do the ac"zvity more, efficiently? Less costly?
Does the activity include hing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No an If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued withoyr~
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being purst d by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATjjON OF CTIVTTY: o S certifies
Appro.vedor ReCease 201(7nctroug'h0oie~InOe~gence
Community on Agency employees being
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b)', 21 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
EVALUATION:
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s).still in force? Yes No
-Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trap'erred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include any ing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this.activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho t
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No V
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursu by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 pr e ZOOVu dAO7oeI~ E3P 0>~ ~ t02 it notifies
IDENTIFICATI8 f (~ETrIlNT
DISCO on the clearance s atus x-employees,.
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s)-still in force? Yes -No
Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes %/ No
Do es) the beneficiary (ies) feel fit is still necessary? Yes j N
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes N
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsib ili yfor the y Yeould be~toran~erred
to another OS component to another Office? e~~/
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No o/ If so, which component and why?.
Does the activity include any ing questionable in the
Watergate? Yes No-~7LIf so, what?
ght of
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with t
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No 1//// If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07: CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION OFCTVTTY:ocg
Approve or a ease 20 p3 1~1 I I K*
clearances,
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b)-, 23
onsi
11o969cewordle
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference (s) .still in force? Yes No
.Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes // No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes / No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trap ferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the a ivity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes Nc If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anhing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this.activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witho
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes tro
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No ' If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: Office of Security component that processes
Approved For Release 2Q1Q1jCe~lA~FQ~$OlORQ7~~(}Q~3n for.
codeword access by individuals employed
by non-USIB agencies.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b), 24 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
EVALUATION: DATE:
our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference (s) .still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trai 'erred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the act' ity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so,. which component and why?
Does the activity include arthing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No r/ If so, what?
Can this.activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so,,.* how?
Is there any activity not now being purstd by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes Nod/ If so, what? .
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION OFACTTVTTY: 'Office of Securit com
Approve or a ease 2 .11~( 7o~-(;lASP g8 ~ ,Ri
cases.
onent responsible
9g 3rW rriage-
ACTIVITY CODE: I) A, (b),, 25 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division
. !4C13
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
.Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes V No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No /
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trans erred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so,,where and why?
Can another component do the act ity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes . No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include any hing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursugd by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No ~/ If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATIAON OF
: o
pprovedAA~I'TVe se Y 2
Fz~r
~,~1(70'"41 1g#~P
on staff employees.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b), 26 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
EVALUATION:
onsibl
ancese
Opr ar
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
.Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes / No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes N07V
T t _ _ L ----
_ _ n
Do
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes- No
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be tra ferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the act' ity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?.
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with
Is there any activity not now being purse by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/1.1/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENT IFICgpTO& W-9000ffl f/Dde CdAF- 442 ~~( e4 (~03 t reviews
files of staffers- being considered for
overseas assignment.
EVALUATION:
DATE:
.What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity?. Date(s)?-
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes
-Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity? No
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes(. No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes N
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be t ran to another OS component or to another office? Yes
If so, where and why? No ran
Can another component do the ac` vity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No T-P - - -I- _,
wMponenr and why?
Does the activity include a thing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued iritho
significant effect on
overall Agency security? Yes fro
If so, how? G.
Is there any activity not now being pursu by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 I D ENT I FI C ~*eialFoAMki~WIL-f?002 lA 7e:s(;1gSR4P8 B00f 23F.000700020033-3
carrying Agency.scredentialspersonnel
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
L, A, (b) 28
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference (s) still in force?
.Who is (are) the beneficiar Yes No
y(ies) of this activity? ---
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessar ?
No
Ye
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes_ ~_ NN
If so, how? ? Yes vo
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trap
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No (erred
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the act' It y
properly? Yes No Y more efficiently? Less costly?
If so, which component and why?.
Does the activity include an
Watergate? Yes hang questionable in the light of
No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes N
If so, how? NO Is there any activity not now being pursue by OS that you fee
important than this one? Yes No l is more
If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 I DENT IF I CA A~~V Fd cAW;fs%Y1D0211-tfO-6t c WW_P?39g .~t9q07(R0?A03R-3
who carry firearms:. ge cy personnel-
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
I, A, (b) -, 29
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
-Lu.L Lni5 activity? Date c
Is (are) the.reference(s).still in force? Yes
..Who is (are) the beneficiar No
y (ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? YesNo
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes C/ No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly?. Yes N
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be traferred
to another OS component
o
t
r
o another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the act' ity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No= If so, which component and why?.
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued With
significant effect
on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursue by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes NoI If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: "Reviews files on all Agency personnel
Approved For Release 2Q0W 1dDnICIA 8-3EMPRQD0U@002003 ftey .
ACTIVITY CODE: I, A, (b), 30 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/Clearance Division/
I&CB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s)-still in' force? Yes
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes / No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly?. Yes No
If so, how? -
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be tranerred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the act ity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No/ If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include an thing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes' No/ If so, what?
Can this.activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued with
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being purse by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
 STATINTL Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3
Approved For Release 2002/11/07 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020033-3