MEETING TOMORROW TO DISCUSS NFIB AND PRC(I) AGENDAS (U)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP83M00171R002100200008-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 25, 2003
Sequence Number: 
8
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 19, 1979
Content Type: 
NOTES
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP83M00171R002100200008-5.pdf135.22 KB
Body: 
25X1 Approved For Release 2004/10/12 : CIA-RDP83M00171 R002100200008-5 Next 2 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2004/10/12 : CIA-RDP83M00171 R002100200008-5 Approved For Release 2004/1 SEC(rAR4-RDP83M00171 R002100200008-5 July 19, 1979 NOTE FOR: The Director of Central Intelligence FROM: Deputy to the DCI for Resource Management SUBJECT: Meeting tomorrow to discuss NFIB and PRC(I) agendas 26X1 1. When the RMS office directors and I meet with you tomorrow morning to discuss the NFIB and PRC(I) meetings on the FY 31-84 NFIP that are scheduled for next Thursday, we intend to propos of action and solicit your concurrence or other guidance. 25X1 2. Although both meetings will take place on the same day and have been called to consider the same subject, we think the focus should be slightly different. At NFIB, when you meet with the program managers, you will want to let them know where we stand in the process, what remains for you and for them to do, and what they can expect at the end of program review in the way of decisions. You will also want to solicit their advice on a subset of carefully selected issues as well as listen to any comments they might have on the other issues 25X1 that you will consider which are not formally on the agenda. Assuming that the PRC(I) meeting takes place in advance of NFIB, you will pr - ably also want to give them a little of the flavor of that meeting. 1 :1 3. At the PRC(I) meeting the focus should probably be less on pro,, cess, and more on consumer needs relative to the small subset of issues. You will also want to spend some time discussing the position you took in the letter to the President on the OMB guidance level. The PRC(I) will be a friendly group and one where you are likely to elicit the sort of support that mig t impress either Jim McIntyre or John White, whoever attends for OMB.1 -1 4. At our meeting tomorrow I am going to aski -1 Director 25X1 of the Program and Budget Office, to outline for you the process: where we stand and what remaint. to be done. Either you or I can make these points at the NFIB meeting on Thursday. Walt Elder, the Acting Director of the Community and Legislative Liaison Office, will give you a little background on how we think the NFIB and PRC(I) meetings should 25X1 DERIVATIVE CL BY ___ C3 REV 99 o DECL WARNING NOTICE l ' INTELLIGENCE SOURCES ~59 b 2-,. _ 3 AND t ETNOI py F r Release 200S~IA-RDP83MOO171 002100200008-5 25X1 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/GP0RDP83M00171 R002100200008-5 5. Of all the issues we have raised during this program review we think there are three that are appropriate for discussion at the NFIB meeting. I will ask Director of the Policy Guidance Office, t ine for you the issues related to survivability of NRP systems. Director of the Program Assessment Office, is prepared to discuss future ELINT configuration, and the various alternatives you might consider; and Director of the 2 5X1 Information Resources Office, will discuss the-portion of the imagery exploitation issue related to IDEX. I can speak about imagery and its exploitation in a more general way. I do not expect the discussion of each issue to last more than five minutes. The purpose is to acquaint you with some of the points that are likely to come up during the NFIB discussion, and to allow you to raise some questions that you would like us to address when preparing your talking points on each of the 25X1 subjects. At the PRC(I) meeting, I propose that. we raise the surviv- ability and ELINT issues but not deal with imagery exploitation becau it is more technical and of less interest to those at Cabinet level. 6. I believe you are thoroughly familiar with the arguments that we made in defense of a higher guidance level from OMB and can discuss that subject quite comfortably with either group. As part of the background papers for both etings we intend to circulate your letter to the President. 7. We plan to issue as much of the background material for these meetings as far in advance as possible. After the meeting tomorrow when we have-gotten your decision on how to proceed, we will circulate the agendas and the issue papers that are complete. By Monday we expect to have finished u whatever remains and will distribute the rest of the material. 8. For your information I have enclosed two other papers in this package that you might care to review before our meeting tomorrow morning: one is an update of the memo I sent you two weeks ago on the process of program review, and the other explains the rationale behind our proposal to include a narrowed guidance range in the decision letters which you will send to program managers. If you hav any questions on 25X1 either of these papers we can discuss them as well. I _J 25X1 25X1 2 Approved For Release 2004/10/12: CIA-RDP83M00171 RP 25X1 SECRET JtUntl. Approved For Release 2004/10/12 : CIA-RDP83M00171 R002100200008-5 Distribution: Cy1 - DCI Cy 2 - DDCI Cy . 3 - ER Cy 4 - D/DCI/RM Cy 5 - D/PBO/RMS Cy 6 - D/IRO/RMS Cy 7 - D/PGO/RMS Cy 8 - A-D/CLLO/RMS Cy 9 - D/PAO/RMS Cy10 - C/DSG/RMS Cyll - RM Registry 25X1 D/DCI/RM4 (19 'July 1979) 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/10/12