TTIC SURVEY OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER RESOURCES

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP83M00914R000800070003-8
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 4
• Document Creation Date: December 19, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 6, 2006
• Sequence Number: 3
• Publication Date: September 7, 1982
• Content Type: MEMO

:CFA-RDP83MOO
14 # OD b 8 O O n''f 0 1J 3- &--=
ROUTING ;:AND RECORD, SHEET
FROM:
TO: (Officrer designation, room number, and
fsuiis!iir~?j
FORM PREVIOUS
1-79 610 USEoTnONS
COMM) W1S (Number each `comment to, show from whom
to whom:; flraiv.o. line across column aftei? each comment.!
Approved For Release 4 f % 9 .:: G#A-_k13F 3- MG 4 Q .84 A O.Ob
 Approved For Release 2006/09/06.: CIA-RZ)-P83M00914R000800070003-8
MEMORANDUM FOR: COITRQLER .
Here- are papers in which requests
-additional resources for TTAC.
has also commented on TTAC resource needs-.
Will you look at this and comment both on the
requirement and-how.-it could be"
-fulf jlled7
Fla note Koehler Is-comments
...
Date- 28 September
Aliv 5_.75 IQL EDITIOUSE NS lOUS
MEMORANDUM FOR.
S
EA IR
Approved For Release 2006/09/06: CIA-RDP83M00914R000800070003-8
Ns -e,4-
 Approved For Release 2006/09/06 :S DP83MOO914R000800070003-8
DCI/IC 82-3594
14 September 1982
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director of Central Intelligence
FROM:
I
irec or, Intelligence Community Staff
SUBJECT: TTIC Survey of Technology Transfer Resources
1. At your request we have reviewedi report on the resource
needs for technology transfer. Our data base does not permit us to
independently confirm the workyears and funds ascribed to this function.
However, it is clear that the urge to increase the effort in FY 1983 can, at
this stage, only be met by one of two courses: (1) reprogramming, (2) a
budget supplemental. The likelihood that we will have an opportunity to
pursue the second course is very slight. Also, a supplemental is only likely
to bring relief in the late Summer of 1984. Therefore, if the DCI places high
priority on improving Community performance in FY 1983, then reprogramming is
the only high assurance route to take.Mean hile, we can look at FY 1984 to
budget additional resources if needed.
2. From .a resource management standpoint, a review of the Summary Report
on Technology Transfer suggests that one additional step would be useful in
deciding to allocate scarce resources (e.g., FY 1983 reprogramming). I
recommend the TTIC be asked to give priority for the areas where improvement
is needed (pp 25-26 of the Summary Report), taking into account the priority
of Soviet acquisition of key technology (p 15, Summary Report) which would
help analysts, collectors, and resource managers know where to begin to attack
a rather large and diverse leakage problem (as illustrated by Table 2, Summary
Report). Absent such a sense of priorities, I am fearful we will be unable to
intelligently focus our existing and foreseeable capabilities in a productive
way.
Approved For Release 2006/09/06Sg -Z DP83M00914R00080007O003-8
 Approved For Release 2006/09/06 SUfRWDP83M00914R000800070003-8
DCI/IC 82-3594
SUBJECT: TTIC Survey of Technology Transfer Resources
DCI/ICS/OPBCI 9/14/82)
Distribution:
Orig. - Addressee, DDCI
;J - Executive Registry
1 - Chairman, TTICI
1 - D/ICS
1 - OPBC chrono
1 - ICS Registry
Approved For Release 2006/09/06SEGlE~DP83M00914R000800070003-8