LETTER TO HONORABLE WILLIAM J. CASEY FROM A. ALAN HILL

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP83M00914R002200240004-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
9
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 10, 2009
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 22, 1982
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP83M00914R002200240004-2.pdf355.98 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 DEPUTY DIREG fO~teF8R I LLSg IGENC r 29, 1982 Routing Slip_ TTE FOR: EO/OGI Dick would like you to tap someone from our office to be responsible for the 'ttached. Please prepare a short memo to go -hrough the DDI to the Executive ecre a Setting him know the name of.'the person you nave selected. That memo should be to me by :OB 6 October. Thanks. DDI 2. C ~p T ACTION INFO . DATE INITIAL INITIAL 1 DCI X 2 DDC X 3. EXDIR X 4 D/ICS 0 WON 5 DI x 6 DDA 7 DDO 8 DOW 9 Chm/NIC X STAT 10 GC 11 IG 12 Compt 13 D/EEO 14 D/Pers STAT 15 D/OEA 16 C/PAD/OEA 17 SA/IA 18 A0/DCI 19 C/IPD/OIS 20 21 22 EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT For necessary action. Please let me know name of responsible individual. NSC review completed. Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 24 ep e__. Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON :ATE: 9-23-82 UBJECT: CCNRE : NUMBER: 077492CA Interagency Global Tssues ALL CABINET MEMBERS Vice President State Treasury * Defense Attorney General Interior Agriculture Commerce Labor HUD Transportation Energy Education Counsellor B CQ 0 V 00'*~ 13 O AD , FEMA E3000 ^ NASA, EPA i ^ REMARKS: DUE BY: Noon 11-12-82 wark Group ACTION FYI Baker ^ fir", Deaver ^ ^ Clark ^ ^ Darman (For WH Staffing) ^ ^ Harper ^ tY Jenkins ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ .D CCCT/Gunn D 13 CCEA/Porter ^ CCFA/Boggs D CCHR/Carleson a CCLP/Uhlmann ^ CCNRE/Boggs 131,011- * Also sent to: Secretary of the Navy, Secretary of the Army, and Secretary of the Air Force. RETURN TO: ^ Craig L. Fuller t8' Becky Norton Dunlop Assistant to the President Director, Office of fnr ('ahinet AfT irc ('ahinet AfTairc CABINET AFFAIRS STAFMG MEMORANDUM Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT COUNCIL ON ENVrRONMENTAL QUALITY 722 JACKSON PLACE. N. W. WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 September 22, 1982 Honorable William J. Casey Director Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Dear Mr. Casey: At the request of the President, the Cabinet Council on Natural Resources and Environment has established an interagency Global Issues Work Group under the direction'of the Council on Environmental Quality. The work group is charged with the responsibility to review, analyze, and evaluate questions on population, resources and environment raised in recent studies prepared in the U.S. and abroad. The objectives and scope of this effort and the information required from the agencies to fulfill this charge are set forth in the enclosed questionnaire. .For this effort to proceed expeditiously and lead to useful, credible conclusions, your personal support is critical. Please assign responsibility for direction of this project to a senior policy official within your department or___ag.eenc who will i re that answers to e ~1 es ions will be returned to CEQ no later than Friday, November 12. That individual should also be responsible for identifying the issues in the appendix which fall under your agency's purview and insuring that they are appropriately assigned and reviewed. Nancy Maloley, Council Member, will be calling your office within a week to follow up with the policy official who will be coordinating this project for your department. If disagreements or different perceptions of these issues exist within your organization, I would welcome a discussion of the points of contention. I appreciate your personal attention and cooperation in this effort. A. ALAN HILL Chairman Global Issues Work Group Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 GLOBAL ISSUES QUESTIONNAIRE Issue Addressed (from ApE,endix)(Example, question 1. a. Population: Growth of.) Agency Responding Technical Contact: (name) (position) (telephone) Recognized Authorities on this issue (Several names, with addresses and telephone numbers where possible) Brief Bibliography (List the best published sources bearing on this area.) Instructions for Questionnaire A concise and a prompt reply is desirable. Please confine your major responses to each question to about four pages which will summarize your best thinking on these issues. Longer responses and important documents could be provided as addenda to your report. Question: (Example: A.8. - Indicate what you, and others, consider appropriate measures of well-being in your areas.) Response: (Please confine to about four pages.) Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83M00914R002200240004-2 GLOBAL ISSUES REPORT (PHASE 1) r Federal Agency Questionnaire Objectives: Answers to the questions posed below are intended to: o Produce a sound, up-to-date analytical base for the development of a perspective on long-term global. population, resource, and environmental issues. o Provide a basis for reviewing the data, methodology, assumptions, projections, and conclusions of previous governmental and non- governmental studies, including, for example, the Global 2000 Report. o Identify the strengths and weaknesses of federal agencies to develop projections useful for long-term policy initiatives. Parameters: o Analyses should be carried out for all issues listed in the Annex within your area of expertise, as well as for any others that you believe important. o The time frame of interest is the present to as far into the future as defensible projections can be made; and backward in time as far as good historical data permit. This will differ from subject to subject. For example, population trends can be extended farther than can energy supply-demand trends. o Analyses should cover, when data and methodology permit, the world as a whole; principal regional groupings of countries; and selected representative countries. Scope of Effort: o Answers should reflect the best current thinking of your department. Cite relevant governmental and nongovernmental studies, including those with differing views. Indicate work in progress or specific suggestions of work that could be done if requested or commissioned. Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83M00914R002200240004-2 Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 2 - Questions to Agencies: A. Sector/Issue Analyses 1. What do past and current data, and your best projections, reveal about trends and likely future conditions in each of the areas of your resppnsibility? (See Annex for areas to be covered.) What are the differences or similarities between your conclusions and those contained in other non- governmental reports, such as Global-2000? What accounts for the differences...better data, different assumptions, improved analytical techniques, recent wori'd events? 2. What are the implications (economic, social, ecological, strategic) for the United States-of global and regional trends and likely future conditions? Which of these trends and conditions would appear to warrant high-priority attention by the federal establishment? 3. What assumptions were used in the analyses (e.g., regarding economic growth, technological progress, resource availability, ecological constraints)? What principal sources of data were employed... including U.S. private sector institutions and international organizations? 4. How would greater or lesser growth in population and the world economy affect the various projections which you described in question 113...and why? -S. What recent developments (economic, social, political, techno- logical), if any, have changed present conditions and future projections from those predicted in earlier studies? 6. Are there any emerging technological or other changes that are likely to or may significantly modify the situation over the next 20 years? What would be the effects on U.S. interests or conditions? 7. What developments are the most likely to lead to more optimistic or more pessimistic results in your field in the next 50 years that could alter the nature of global environmental problems? 8. Indicate what you (and others) consider appropriate measures of well-being in your areas. Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 - 3 - B. Agency Analytical Capability 1. What were the major analytical tools (e.g., models used in he analyses? (Briefly describe them, including assumptions and key variables.) What degree of uncertainty is contained in your analyses, and what are the causes of it?.' 2. Assess your capability for "providing projections of the quality needed for long-term policy decisions"...an alleged deficiency of the federal agencies highlighted in Global 2000. What is the quality of your data base and analytical tools? What significant gaps in the data and analytical deficiencies exist? 3. Provide a brief essay on the nature and quality of the sources of data used in your analyses and those relied on by others in the field. What are the important differences between the nature and quality of the data used in your analyses of the various areas and those that exist elsewhere within and outside the U.S. Govern- ment? 4. What recent changes, if any, have been made in your analytical, and forecasting capability? What improvements do you believe are desirable in the near term. . .and realistically possible? Do you have any current activities or plans designed to achieve an improved capability in the next two to five years? 5. Looking forward, what do you consider to be the most important indicators for confirmation or refutation of the projections? For example, what appear to be the critical indicators of climate change, or human nutrition? Describe when and how such data becomes available (e.g., vital statistics, oil production data, etc.). -6. Indicate significant new modeling and analytical exercises conducted in your area from 1978 to 1982. Include a retro- spective examination of past uses of models in light of actual. results. Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 These topics reflect issue areas which should be addressed in the study. Federal agencies should provide analyses for each of those areas which fall under their mandate and address any other significant issues which do not appear on this list. 1. Population a. Growth of; Rates of Change in Growth and Fertility b. Migration (rural-urban and international) c. Birth and Death Rates 2. Human Settlements a. Urban Growth b. Urban Services (water, sanitation) 3. Economic Issues a. GNP b. Per Capita Income c. Income Differences Among Nations d. Non-Monetary Factors in Standards of Living a. Production and Productivity b.. Demand c. International Trade d. Agricultural Land Conversion/Expansion e. Agricultural Impacts (pesticides, fertilizer, water, energy) f. Land-Soil (erosion, salination, waterlogging, reclamation, restoration) g. Desertification (rates, trends and effects on productivity) h. Transportation and Distribution 5. Fisheries (Oceanic and Inland, including Aquaculture) a. Production b. Demand c. Environmental Effects 6. Forests (Temperate and Tropical) Extent-Trends (including rates of deforestation and reforestation and change in'the forest cover) 7. Water Resources a. Supply-Demand (industrial, municipal, agricultural) (include price effects) b. Conflicts Over Shared Water Resources c. Quality Changes (surface and groundwater) Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2 8. Non-Fuel Minerals a. b. c. d. e. Supply-Demand International Trade Conservation Trends Environmental Impacts Substitutability (e.g., waste disposal) 9. Energy ( Including Coal, Oil, Nuclear, Non-Conventional, Firewood) a. b. c. d. Supply-Demand International Trade Environmental Impacts Conservation Trends 10. Environmental Quality a. Atmosphere (lower and upper, including acid rain and urban pollution) b. Water (marine and fresh; surface and sub-surface) c. Coastal Areas and Wetlands 11. Climate a. b. C02 and Deforestation Relationships Impacts of Change on Agriculture 12. Biological Diversity/Extinction 13. Technology a. b. Types Impacts of (positive and negative) 14. Political and Institutional Factors Affecting the Global Environment Approved For Release 2009/08/10: CIA-RDP83MOO914R002200240004-2