HOUSE PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE REVIEW OF CIA OVERSEAS

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP83M00914R002400170021-9
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 3
• Document Creation Date: December 20, 2016
• Document Release Date: November 19, 2007
• Sequence Number: 21
• Publication Date: March 8, 1982
• Content Type: MEMO

ROUTUV~ At~i~? R~CORi3 Si~i~ET ~ ( -- - .?~
SUSIEC7: (Optional) - ~ ~~ aT
Comptroller's I~'iemo .of 8 March 1982
FROJri: James N. GlerLUn
EXTENSION
NO.
Director of Personnel
SE58 HQS
i
DATE ,,
~g ''
~ r (.EVE ~~~ 3~~~~
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
DATE
j
OFFICER'S
COMMEN75 (Number each comment fo show from whom
INITIALS
to whom. Draw o line across column efier each comment.)
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
1.
Executive Registry
Agree generally with Nlaury's
7EI2 HQS
~
summary of f,PSCI staff meeting.
2.
~
We are meeting again with
'
Nlarty Faga of the HPSCI staff
s.
on Wednesday, 17 D7arch to walk
Executive Director
him through the study so as to
,
focus him on it's thrust--which-
a.
is pay not job classification.
The stud was communi -wide
s.
I suspect that some sta mem ers
e.
overlooked this fact when (and if )
{k
they- read the study. T'he problem
appears to be defining who is
'~.
in t;`~e Community. and should
receive this pay. i~fy staff will
be talking with the IC Staff to
$.
~ get their viecas along with Marty
Faga's. I then plan to propose
~ a game plan to representatives of
q?
this comimmity to get their agree-
_
ment as to members of the Communi
and who should receive the over-
io.
~
( seas pay.
ii.
-
I
. at
ne ~ . erum
12.
~
1
..
i3.
~
i
~ cc: Comptroller
t a.
i
~
i 5.
.
~ 1 O(~
v t ~/
1=ORt,1 ~~ ~ USE PREVIOUS
7-~~ EDITIONS
' Approved For Release 2007/11/19 :CIA-RDP83M00914R002400170021-9 --u---
Approved For Release 2007/11/19 :CIA-RDP83M00914R002400170021-9
 Approved For Release 2007/11/19: CIA-RDP83M00914R002400170021-9
~~tl~i%~
coMPT 82-
0337
..
8 h1AR i9$2
MEMORAAIDUM FOR: E
xecutiv
e Director
TF~ROUGH D
FROM M
C
SUBJECT H
irector
aurice
omptrol
ouse Pe
of Personnel
Lipton
ler
rmanent Select Com
mittee on Intelligence (HPSCI)
R
eview o
f CIA Overseas Pay
1. On 4 March, Jim G1 rum al n~ i f
his staff and consultants briefed the HPSCI staff on
our overseas pay study. Mike O'Neil, Jim Bush, and Marty Faga represented the
2. For two hours, we discussed the Ageney's need for increased overseas
pay, the consultants' survey and analysis, and the correspondence on the
issue. A number of points were cleared up.
-- The staff questioned the status of the .overseas pay study. We told
them it was completed, but that the consultants' final recommenda-
tions would not be made until the April completion of the overall
review of CIA compensation.
-- The staff concluded that some employees
were "overpaid." The consultants explained that the study did not
attempt to absolutely classify the jobs, the results ware accurate in
the relative sense, and that a favorable 250 rating point allowance
from OPM to the State Department was not included. in the calcula-
tions.
However, we did not allay the staff's concern, They said:
-- They expected a Communit~j-wide study.
25X1
25X1
J 25X1
25X1.
25X1
~~~~'
Approved For Release 2007/11/19: CIA-RDP83M00914R002400170021-9
 ' ~ Approved For Release 2007/11/19: CIA-RDP83M00914R002400170021-9
~~~:~~~~
-- The staff expected Intelli enee Community Staff participation. We
mentioned that was our contact ar_d that Jim~Glerum had
cleared the study with but said that the Intelligence
Community Staff was not involved in the analysis.
-- The staff members said they preferred increased pay targeted at
specific groups of our employees rather than applied across the
board. Jim Glerum went through the other options we hack ~nnsidered
and the difficulty of their implementation.
3. I asked if the staff thought the following procedures would be
acceptable:
-- In mid-summer (about 60 days after completion of the study) we could
present the rationale for our suggested options;
-- Present the options suggested by the study;
-- Include the DCI's recommendation for the other Intelligence Community
25X1
25X1
The staff said they thought that might be acceptable.
25x1
~. At the conclusion of the meeting I was told informally that the staff
felt the discussion raised as many questions as it ans~;ered, and that they
would likely draft a letter for Chairman Boland to send to the DCI asking for
a Community-wide recommendation. They would expect Jo?~n McMahon to address
the letter in the CIA he
25X1
25X1
Maurice Lipton
,~ .
Approved For Release 2007/11/19: CIA-RDP83M00914R002400170021-9