PROPOSAL BY RMS/IRO TO INCLUDE FUNDS FOR A COMMUNITY-WIDE BIBLIOGRAPHIC SYSTEM IN THE FY-81 BUDGET

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP83T00573R000100120007-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 2, 2001
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 25, 1979
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP83T00573R000100120007-4.pdf257.8 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2002/01/08 : CIA-RDP83T00570001001200 MWWRANDUM FOR: Comptroller ATTBNTIOU s STATI NTL raw: Bruce T. Johnson Director of Data Processing SUBJECT: Proposal by RMS/IRO to Include Funds for a Community-wide Bibliographic System in the -81 Budget 14 CDP strongly recommends that the issue paper on the subject of 1981 funding for a Community-wide bibliographic - ~._.-...... ...~.ss.aa. and a system in 1981 is ure r t raised as an issue at this If a ar time. political even it must be political reasons presented, then Alternative 4, to defer all action wing further study, is the only practical alternative for the Ca unity to adopt. 2. In January 1979, in collaboration with the office of Central Reference, ODP submitted to the NFID IBC a proposal that the Community study the "feasibility and desirability of adopting CIA's RECON bibliographic index and ADSTAR micro- graphic document storage and 'retrieval system as a Centralized Intelligence Comunity Bibliographic and Document Retrieval System, managed and operated for the Community by CIA." The Witte, accepted the proposal and authorized the Chairman, to undertake a study of the proposal. That ee of sot b completed, although a preliminary statement 415 been produced, and the IBC has had no # Opportunity to either -study or evaluate its conclusions. Thes dscisio s on the adoption Of such a~centralized indexing retrieval system. and 3. In its proposal, CIA included preliminary cost garees which were admittedly rough and subject to refi e- n ment once the Community had decided exactly what kind of =ade clear that there were 7no_resc urcesMin theCIA.'prr3aggr'as to support an enhancement of its bibliographic and document retrieval system and the pro ai stated the resources Approved For Release 2002/01/08 : CIA-RDP83T00573R000100120007-4 Approved For Release 2002/01/08 : CIA-RDP83T00573R000100120007-4 to expand and upgrade the existing system to serves of other Cos nunity agencies sh ld ou be Provided b y those agencies. The issue paper presented by the IRO sub- stitutes for CIA's rough figures as yet unevaluated costs developed by the contractor which has been conducting the ISC study. We continue to believe that the costing of the proposal should be carefully developed after the Community has made its substantive decisions on w a kind of services it requires. 4. In its proposal CIA assumed, we believe realistically, that Community use of 1 PCON and ADSTAR would entail significant expansion of those systems and our rough estimates of possible stns ahem rt d t i e o ant cipate thetf th cos oat expansion. presented in the issue __-....,.~. .~az %...W UU61;5 relationship between the teemiandethZ a expay a cued a static Population which it will be rPandesd custazeer expected coats Outlined in Alternative to serve. Additionally, the costs Outlined in Alternative t1 do?not include anyorefer- *Acee to the cost associated with the personnel needed to operate a Community system of this kind. The money amounts cited is Alt ernative 1 are not inconsistent with our previous estimates. The estimate of floor space is inadequate. If space were available as an extension of existing CIA txsstputeer facilities, approximately 1,500 sq. ft. would requireed. For a stand-alone center to sew the needs of the Community, our original estimate of 2#500 sq. ft. of floor space remains valid. The COINS costs a shown as one-time coats, but there are recurring costs associated with the maintenance of a COINS interface. They appear to be missing. Alternatives 2 and 3 are res t d i p en e n such skeletal form as to defy analysis. Regarding number 3, we do not see how SAFE, designed to serve carefully defined information handling problems of CIA and DIA analysts, can be easily trans- fOrm" into a Community bibliographic and document retrieval System. A proposal to change the architecture of SAFE on the basis of so little analysis strikes us as highly dangerous and potentially very expensive. only one of the four alternatives ... ..........R..~,,~~, s =nlxine, _ presented, which we find The issue paper tends to draw its support for early ram the INC 'Report of the Analysts Su t M ' " AUSS F orese ppor . indeed concluded that "a standard online bibliographic Approved For Release 2002/01/08 : CIA-RDP83T00573R000100120007-4 Approved For Release 2002/01/08 : CIA-RDP83T00571RR000100120007-4 reference system for all intelligence source materials" should be developed. By the definition of RECON included in the preliminary report of the contractors studying the CIA proposal, RECON as it presently exists does not qualify as areference system for all intelligence source materials. The CIA proposal which anticipates expansion of SON in the direction of greater co mprehensiveness would come closer satisfying the re tndations in the Analysts Support report, but an expanded RECON cannot be delivered within the coats proposed in the IRO issue paper. 00? was prepared to play its Dart in providing a Commanity bibliographic service when it forwarded to the IHC the original proposal regarding development of a Caearaunity bibliographic and Document Retrieval System. Nothing has happened to cause us to revise that commitment. Beaver, strongly believe that the orderly process begun early in 1979 should be allowed to run its course, that the results of the as yet incomplete study should be presented to the Infer_ *st on Handling Committee, and that the results of the Comitt"'s deliberations should be used as the basis for the presentation of budgetary proposals in the upcoming Program cycle leading to the development of the 1982 NPIP budget. /s/ Bruce T. Johnson Bruce T. Johnson STATINTL o 1 DDA DAR O/D/ODP/BJhhsnon:ee/10-25-79 Distribution: Orig - adse 1 DDA 1 - D/OCR 2 - ODP Registry 2 - O/O/DDP Approved For Release 2002/01/08 : CIA-RDP83T00573R000100120007-4