UNFUNDED 1981 REQUIREMENTS (U)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP83T00573R000300010018-2
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: C
• Document Page Count: 4
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: February 5, 2001
• Sequence Number: 18
• Publication Date: September 19, 1980
• Content Type: MF

Approved For Release 2001/07/1ir
0f)P(, )-1263
i ]-1c
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Hanregement Staff, DOA
FROM: Bruce T. .1(4,nson
Director o2 Data Processing
SUBJECT: Unfunded 1c11 Requirements (I?)
REFERENCE: Your memo c td 13 Aug PO, same subject
(mIA 80-1F68)
1. Based upon your definition of a hard unfunded
requirement as an action or a payment that must be accomplished--
without option, ODP has two unfunded/underfunded requirements
that will become hard in 1982. It should be noted that these
requirements would have beer funded by ODP in 1981 if our budget
had not been reduced $500K as mart of assessment applied to the
DDA. These requirements are:
SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING CONTRACTUAL SUPPORT - There is a 1981
requirement to provide contractual expertise for highly
complex and sophisticated system software. This includes
support required for Conversation Access Method (CAM)
terminals software enharcernents and GINS system software
support and enhancements. As a result of the 3500K reduction
in the 1981 ODP budget, only 3225K of this $625K requirement
is funded, which leaves an underfunded balance of $400K. The
reduction or loss of these activities would delay the
implementation of the new ODP Delta Data terminal, impact
both day-to-day CIMS and CAM user support and GIMS
enhancements for CAMS II development--all required in 1981.
Funding will be required In the first quarter of fiscal year
1981. (U)
ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS SOFTWARE PACKAGE - The Access Control
System ACF2) provides software security for disk and tape
storage data bases, projafr validation, and access controls
for data in both ODP eomauter centers. This software package
is being purchased after a lease of one year in which there
was extensive testing on one computer system. A separate
copy of ACF2 is required in 1981 for each computer system at
a total coat of S87U, which is unfunded. If this software
security package is not obtained, ODP will not be able to
meet ISSG data security rfinuirerments anti the overall security
of data accessed in the ior':nuuter centers will not be
improved. Funding will '-v! required in the .,-r ter of
fiscal year 1981. (C)
Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA-RDP83T00573R0003000106'f84 C z/z~9_ Od
 Approved For Release 2001/07/12 :'CIA-I?RE
9FIL00010018-2
2. In addition to the --eauirements stated above, ODP has a
number of requirements which do not quite meet your definition of
hard unfunded, but nevertheless are requirements which we feel
committed to support. These requirements ares terminals for
CLASS A stations; new high q,.iplity TEMPEST-secure printers for
all users; standard terminals for the DDO; upgrades for computer
systems supporting the OP-PPM PFRINSUR project, TADS, and the DDO;
and contract instructors to 3:pplement our staff instructors.
These unfunded requirements mount to $1.5 million (C)
3. As of 1 October 198+) there will be no ODP budgeted 1981
non-personnel services funds excess to the needs for which the
funds were initially budgetel. (U)
is/ Bruce T. Johnson
25X1, '~ruce fohnson
irectnr of Data Processing
O/D/ODP/ ee/09/i9/80
Distribution:
Orig - adse
1 - C/P&BG/MS
1 - ODP Registry
2 - O/D/ODP
Approved For Release 2001/07/12: GIA- ; DP8 00010018-2
 Re ke 200 ghQr1 ~(3 tL573RQQA300010018-2
Ir MW
DD/A 80-1868
1 3 AUG 1930
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Comirunications
Director of Date Processing
Director of Finance
Director of Information Services
Director of Loqistics
Director of Medical Services
Director of SecLrity
Director of Training
25X1A
Ndfl"_. _ Staff, DDA
ODP
1. As was the case in Fiscal Year 1980, we will enter Fiscal
Year 1981 with a significant number of important unfunded or
underfunded budget requirements. As difficult as 1980 was, 1981 will
probably be more difficult, budgetwise. The Comptroller was unable to
fund some $2 million of our "hard" 1980 unfunded needs. I expect the
1981 total to be at least as high. (U)
2. In the face of this I believe it prudent to sensitize the
Comptroller and our own senior managers to the cumulative
effect--Directoratewide--of our =.981 budget dilemma. To facilitate
this, please provide the following information so that we can
aggregate and format it for review:
a. Each 1981 unfunded or underfunded Non-Personal
Services requirement in excess of $25,000 that,
in your judgment, will becone a hard requirement
at some point in 1981. For each, please furnish:
1. a description of the requirement;
2. the designation as unfunded or
underfunded. If ,underfunded, what
is the total requirement and how
much do you have available;
3. an explanation of or.y it must be
funded in 1981;
4. the estimated impact that would
result on you and your customer(s)
if the fundinq ca-Znot be made
available; and
5. the Fiscal Year 1931 quarter in which
the funding will Drobably be required. (U)
Approved For Release 2001/07/12: CIA-RDP83T00573R000 VW%Ef-L BY - $---9 ~~w
t 00
9c uqu 3.2
rnNPI~~Ei~~~t~1L D REVEU~F`RO M`VON A August
 Approved For Reuse 20619 f'1il plF f qTq1At80573RQp0300010018-2
b. All budgeted 1991 non-personal services funds
that are, as of 1 October 1930, excess to the needs
for which the funds were ini---ially budgeted. Please
furnish for each:
1. The amount of the e