(UNTITLED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84-00022R000200020007-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 4, 2003
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 12, 1952
Content Type: 
NOTES
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84-00022R000200020007-4.pdf150.37 KB
Body: 
25X1A Ong F l':: coU~r:: (. nte. ~,1_Ci e ; {l r u'.il -r T1.7 e `` 1. d For Release 2003/12/09 :CIA-RDP84-00022E 00020002ti00f-4 s ' ~~ 19`'~ From Records Center MOTE ON 7111- "ADRR:GIJACY SURVI.YCn There were apparently three OCD Surveys. The, first (December 19746) and. th.c second (May 19747) are here. The third seems to have been started in January 1948, and it would aupear t' ~n:t quite a lot of work was done on i lthouuh I am not, quite at the end of my rope yet, inquiries lead me to believe that Just as they ww're get-,inF to the point of finishing the thing, Olsen and '-.is people left in favor of 'ndrews and it s; there was a great reorganization with the usual loss of files. I should not be surprised if the item numbered 'IT" below is the sole survivor of Survey T`3? I have a couple. of people still working on i_t, and something :ore may be found yet. This is a'EA - YDOCUMENT 0* tat ft use M IMS, The record copy has been This doctiaMa.t has A"n r 'fea^+ to Natienat Archives approaeA for raleass through i tOr the HISTORICAL REVIEW PRaGAAM. the . nXST ICAL J I lr of Date - HAP th. Cratral ?intell4,gnc": t*t. __ Approved For Release 2003/12/09 : CIA-RDP84-00022R000200020007-4 000025 Approved For Release 2003/12/09 : CIA-RDP84-00022R000200020007-4 P,ONT~ {,NTS IN THI`, II'' 1, ume rals ~~ refer to yellOT,., slips 25X1A seems to be all that remains of the 25X1A Third Adequacy Sur-rey which was begun in January 1948. rather threatening tone re--.rd~_ng the budget seems to reflect a dissatisfaction 7.;ith CIA, thou--h he 25X1A exruresses himself as satisfied, with the Summaries. It would a;>:ee:ur that by this time, has begun to t ink of CIA as primarily an institution that z: niches the other aencios with material they need that is not ~,:"i-thin th .ir specialty. If so, CIA iw working for IAC---not vice versa. Nay have been normal Navy point of view---see Situation Reports. Do not think O.R{,, ever got into business of furnishing Navy's non- vaval intelligence on request. Think OR_5 would have agreed with imp~ication.that ONI get out of the political intelligence business. II. This is part of controversy that runs all through this folder. Office of ter of-Vice wanted to receive CL?. curr :nt intelligence or ;,f.et e;>tra conies. Requests generally approved. State ',s objection recorded here based mostly on fact that OR!,; received and could use the so-called State S./S -traffic w-,ihich sucoo,sed. to be high policy and very sensitive. Hence many subscribers cut off. List continued to grow nevertheless. l ihat interests m : is State I s 151- the assur]1,~tian that it at liberty to ithhold intelli;enceu;henevcr it chose---that CIA received anything- only through sufferance;. Approved For Release 2003/12/09 : CIA-RDP84-00022R000200020007-4 Approved For Release 2003/12/09 : CIA-RDP84-00022R000200020007-4 III. This is 7 .hay Survey which we a1r ad;, have. IV. purvey of December 9, 106, which we didn't have before as far as I }:!"'.o`.'7. It looks very much like the one o- Me months later. I an come, nt'_ng seriatim on page 1 of seem - reference to nla]'il'.Jc e'en paragraphs. (1) Prohl a bee ;.nd. this run" Wcu:'}.eo"t a=_.'tor y'. Because of Hate and oth:r pressure, nece ,s:ar,/ to havo ter re;: i;1 =_ct :d d_...tr :uti.on is , n" h n' at all . e ei ,ive to be included. This, of ceursr, n m,.p red some offices where. the eery n ople who should have seen the 5umn ties didn't. 'roposF?l, made here carried out in 1951: OCT, in. effect, prints periodical for ever; shade of taste and state of clearance. (2) As I said concerning IA 7 urj;( r-- .hat these ue.on].w.anted was not "Comnents" on items of current intell rence, but ,-lust p:Lain furth'r onnlanetions. The conciseness of the Summaries---that so many professed to admire- and might been a time-saver for a thoroughly informed p:::rson---simply male many of the items unintelligible for non-experts in areas. (3) "not oriented toward an; 'it ins, in a _ afloct__on of the same thing. The items were "oriented" toward s.omothinr; all right, but no one wrote a paragraph telling the 'eGAS-2 or the DCNO (On) what it was. See same in (h), (?), and (6) )t that, in (6) the core"nnter tries to auribe his own i'-nor ance c t_'! Approved For Release 2003/12/09 : CIA-RDP84-00022R000200020007-4 Approved For Release 2003/12/09 : CIA-RDP84-000228000200020007-4 (7) The e bl articles w_ re far from !on,-, _ath r. , t;h rult o ' err; , `; and lactualit were so r:ia - ~. d th.= t~- -..> ,. ~ ~ne articles 'w..rc.-10~ ~n!_n I ~;. _ the ._ Ler contained in turned out to be not what the reader wanted, h; resented_ the. bore- dom o-:' it 'r an `. find "'his out Gh'' 11:.1r0_ way, hence the request ;: or a S. YIO7si s. The s, nopsis thod Tl