(UNTITLED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84-00022R000300090013-9
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 28, 2000
Sequence Number: 
13
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
NOTES
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84-00022R000300090013-9.pdf64.38 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release-2000/09/14: CIA-RDP84-00022ELOO0300090013-9 13 Where in activity had been going on r etc. Meaning not clear Page 2? Page 55 t 1so Tab G, Page 10 Judge Advocate Probably should be Inspector General There is a bvmat Staff operating as a unit of Co. Is this the successor of that in 0-SI? I thick this needs clarification. Page 31 Atomic Eery Estimates It is my impression that the first AE explosion by U SSIt was well in advance of the time estimated that it co ,ad be produced. If his is so, night this be mentioned here, with reasons for the under-estimate. tam ?t: jectivoa not been determined after, ? i teen months? This point might be touched on in more detail, unless it is too sensitive 1 13/2 If this was approved 6 N ovanher 1950, y have cer. Page 36 Just what is the Department of Defense tr7ing to do to the SIC? I thought sabotage was the responsihili. ty of another agency Page 39 Scientific panel In Boston I understand that the Contact Branch of 00 thinks this is a splendid organization and of great utility to CIA but that OSI is more skeptical. Do you wish to cor, mont an this? Page 1:9 Visit of AD/SI to Geniar,7 in 1950 Firms to establish scientific representation were made in A.,gust, 191.9. Is 1950 correct? Page 70 Paragraph 1 'splacedtt Not clear to met, presumably the meaning is that the docmaent might be somewhere about, but not where hands can be laid on it. This z fight be rephrased Approved For Release 2000/09/14: CIA-RDP84-00022R000300090013-9