NUCLEAR INTELLIGENCE.

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84-00022R000300160005-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
5
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 7, 2000
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 1, 1946
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84-00022R000300160005-0.pdf421.89 KB
Body: 
34 Approved For Release 2005/01/10 : MENEO?RANDIJIA 'FOR: The Secretary of War, SUBJECTs Nuclear Intel enoe. 84-00022R000300160005-0 1 August 1946. There is need to re-evaluate the intelligence aspects of the Manhattan Engineer District, particularly in the light of the es- tablishment of a National Intelligence Mthority, and there is need for a firm intramilitary understanding before the enactment of control legislation on nuclear fission., It would seem to me that our War Department Director of Intelligence, ON4 and the State Department should not be proscribed from active pursuit of intelligence leads in the field of nuclear fission, whether the information be of importance for military or civilian purposes. Not only should these agencies be free to pick up such intelligence in the normal course of their activities, but they should be directed to pursue such intelligence, There is at the moment no field of foreign intelligence of more vital importance to our national security than that of nuclear derrelopessnte. The intense foreign activity in this field, both for military and industrial purposes, is one which we must aonitor with all the resources which we can muster. In order most effectively to marshal our intelligence- resources for this task, there is need of competent and authoritative coordination between the various agencies. While the over-all responsibility for this task is vested, by Presi- dential directive, in the Director of Central Intelligence, who is charged with the "correlation and evaluation of intelligence relating to national security", the various national intelligence agencies, including those of the War* State and Navy Departments, should be most alert to those suspects of thie problem falling in their spheres. I understand the Manhattan Engineering District holds that a verbal directive from the President prohibits it from giving any information or intelligence on foreign activities in the field of nuclear fission to any outside agency", as for example, the Joint Intelligence Committee. the Director of Intelligence, or the Director of Central Intelligence. There has been under consideration for several months a reoommendation to you from the Joint Claes of Staff (JCS 1664 and JCS 1664/1) that you recommend to the President that he issue the following directive to the Director, anhattan Engineering Districts Apmved For Release 2005/CgcnIDP84-00022R00030016 25X1 Approved For R ease 2005/01 ?. 84-00022R0110300160005-0 2 re that you make available to the Joint Chief* of Staff all intelligence and information relating capabilities intentions of nations other than the United States, the 'Dated Kingdoms and Canada regarding atomic warfare. I further desire that the Manhattan Engineering District assist the intelligence agency of the joint Chiefs of Staff to the fullest extent in the latter's evaluation of the capabilities and intentions of those nations. *2. The arrangements for implementing this directive should be nada directly with the Joint Intelligence Comittee of the Joint Chief* of Staff.* I take it that' beePpee the officers of the Manhattan Engineering state that the President's verbal directive gives complete in these Matters to General Groves, it is felt that the only could come from Presidential directive. On the other hand, I understand from my recent conversation with you that you are able to direct such action without recourse to the President. If my under- standing is correct, this course would eertainly save valuable time and much unnecessary paper work. It may interest you to know that this propoad directive has already had the approval of Admirals Leahy* and is presently under discussion in theDepartment, preparatory to cone sideration by the Chief of Staff. It seems to me that not only is it highly desirable that you issue the above directive, or its equivalent, but also that it should be made clear through appropriate channels that our various normal intelligence agencies should be free to pick up nuclear fission intelligence. / have in mind foreign intelligence, exclusive of the United Kingdom and Canada. This would not bar the Manhattan Engineeri-ng District fran own intelligence agency in much the same wry as the technical ve their own technical intelligence agencies, however it to coordinate intelligence operations in this field by them to proper over-all administrative control. Without finitiee interrelationship the position of the Director Intelligences for example, is ambiguous. For instance, in the NIA Directive Mo. 1 the Director of reel Intelligence operates in accordance with the following ructions* * * * *5. Such intelligence received by the intelligence agencies of your Departments as may be designated by the National Intelligence Authority shall be freely available to the Director of Central Intelligence for correlations. evaluation or dissemi- nation. To the extent approved by the National Intelligence Approved For Release 2005/01/1,12zCI,./e010P84-00022R000300160005-0 LiAtli Approved For Release 2005/01 : gla84-00022R000300160005-0 Authority', the operations of said intelligence agencies shall be open to inspection by the Director of Central Int?fligenc. in connection with planning fanctionse '8, within he scope of existing law and Presidential directives, other departments and agencies of the executive branch of the Federal Government shall furnish such intelligence information relating to the national security as is in their possession, and as the Director of Central Intelligence may fro. time to time request pursuant to regulations of the National Intelligence Authority," It would seem to me there should likewise be explicit in- to the Manhattan Engineering District to make foreign in- on nuclear fission available to the Director of Central in the same way that he is to have access to ax y other lligence. some such clear understanding and express ral Intelligence Group be expected to give urance that the intel1igence coverage is con- at all times. This responsibility surely can hands of the Manhattan Engineering District as they butone specialized area of intelligence, After all, ccetent evaluation of intelligence depends on broad fmillarity with foreign intelligence, which must include all fields. am here mainly concerned with the foreign intelligence aspect of the field represented by lanhattan Engineering District, but there is a further aspect involving domestic information which is most germane to the general problem of national security. While I shall attempt to delineate this aspect in terms of the Manhattan project, it will be seen that it will apply with equal force to any military plans or developments affecting our security. Manifestly, information on our own most recent developments of techniques and war devices depending on nuclear fission should be confined to the minimum number of individuals consistent with effective War Department functioning. But among these should be included, as individuals the Director of Central Intelligence, the Director of Approved For Release 2003EURETRDP84-00022R000300160005-0 Approved For Release 2005/01/1SECK14-00022R0Q4300160005-0 4 InteUiinoe he Director of Plans and Op rations. and the Director of Research and Developments Each of these individuals must have access to such information on our own developments as is requisite to carrying out their respective responsibilities. Thus, those responsible for intelligence should have access to such Manhattan facts as may have a bearing on their effectual evaluation of foreign intelligence in this fields The Director of Plans and Operations should have access to such information on our own nuclear developments as are relevant to strategic plenming, to logistics, and to operational use, Corresponding considers, time apply to the Director of Research and Development, with respect to his responsibility for directing our developmental efforts; either he is or he is not responsible for the over-all direction of our re- search programl In each of these cases there is the difficult, but not insolvable, problem of deciding just haw much each of these individuale must knew in order to carry out their responsibilities, and of the extent to which they may call in experts from their own show in making use of this information. Aey case in which these decisions can not be arrived at by mutual give-andp.take can and should be resolved by the Chief of Staff or, if necessary, by the Secretary of War. Approved For Release 2005/0 P84-00022R000300160005-0 25X1 Approved For Release 20449e6E0A9M9F184-411922R000300160005-0 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY MEMORANDUM 2 August 1946. MEMO FOR: Oen. Vandenberg. Attached is your copy of the memo to the Secretary, which was given to him yesterday. Approved Forttit1/41 fer1/10 : CIA-RDP84-00022R000300160005-0