MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR PLANS FROM L. K. WHITE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
21
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 20, 2002
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 21, 1964
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2.pdf767.91 KB
Body: 
DD/S RGISTRY Approved For Release 2.siteutr CIA-RDP84-00780R00050006 004c3v- FILE E DD/S 64-4707 2 1 SEP 1964 MEMORANDUM FOR: Assistant Deputy Director for Plans Tom: You will recall suggesting just before I went on leave that we explore the feasibility of publishing regulations in batches semiannually. In looking Into this, 1 find that during 1963 we sent 960 typewritten pages to the printer for letterpress reproduction and there were 66 pages of Instruc- tions to explain the changes being processed. This would meat that we would have 33 pays of instructions alone every six months to explain the changes in 480 peps of regulatory material. 1 think you can see the problems that we would encounter if we were to hold everything and submit it for coordivation In a package of this size. Even if it were feasible for the editorial staff to review this much material at one time and ensure that all of the most recent changes had been accurately incorporated, the people whom we must ask to coordinate would literally have to drop everything else and devote full time for several days to reviewing regulations. Some of the changes would almost W- arts* be out of date before the coordination process could be completed. Most of the regulations we issue should not be held le) and many of theta cannot be delayed for a period of months. Examples of Mai of these we have processed recently are the regulations changing the policy on vehicles and transportation allowances, the housing regulations, and the travel regulaticas . If we issued policy and procedure only twice a year. we would never have a current set of regulations and, worse, we would never know which regulations might be current and which might not. I would lik.e to consider this question closed, but if you feel it Is worth trying we might run an experiment with the cooperation of your publications control people during the next several months. SA-DD/S:RHW:nft (1 Sept 64) Distribution: Orig - Adse - DD/S Subject 1 - DD/S Chrono s/vds SECRET Excluded front aueonia downgrading and dealassifieation Sted L. K. White Deputy Director for Support Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 CONIEFNTIAL j ? Approved Forxelease 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R00050146 Colonel White: 16:111' -1964 You asked that we have re (iv for von when vnil returned a summary of the pros and cons relating to be processed in batches semiannually. suggestion that regulations 25X1 I have not been able off the record, has says he thinks this to come up with anything to support this idea nor, from whom I solicited arguments. Joe must have been something entioned to 'm 25X1 quite some time ago which was noted by Mr. K at that with you until several months later. He believes now tine DUI not raisea 25X1 that as since been persuaded that the idea is not practical. Unfoitunateiy, I don't see how we can use this background in discussing 25X1 the question with Some of the cons are: a. During 1963 we sent 960 typewritten pages to the printer for letter press reproduction. This would mean processing 480 pages twice a year. If we were to hold a package for six months and submit it for coordination in this volume, we would have to expect coordinators to drop everything else they are doing for several weeks in order to get them processed; and it seems doubtful that we would ever get any- thing coordinated. If, on the other hand, we coordinate as we go and only hold the printing for release twice a year, the burden on the printers would be intolerable. It would also impose an intolerable burden upon the editorial staff to check and cross check and ensure that everything is current as well as fully coordinated before release to the printer. b. During 1963 there were 66 instruction sheets to explain the changes being processed. This would mean that we would process 33 pages of instructions alone every six months. c. Using this system we would never have a current set of regulations and, worse, there would be no way of telling whether or not they are current at any given time. d. Most of the regulations we issue cannot or should not be held up. Examples of some of these we have processed recently are the regulations changing the policy on vehicles and transportation allowances; the housing regulations; and the travel regulations. There are other arguments having to do with mechanics and details which would refute the idea of semiannual production, but I haven't made any attempt to marshall them because it seems to me the arguments quoted above should be sufficiently persuasive. Attached is a memo to Tom for your signature in case you want to deal with this matter separately without waiting to discus with him the other questions he raised at the same time. /7341? rptf' r!r17?-ITI 1 Exatuttal tram automate ruivakradtmt anti . tess70-,--1-1 OUP RHW Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 25X1 25X1 FILE Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R00050006000122 FOlt: 2 DEC 1964 Director of awratimlocietala -"Itroaoir of ,,t4e-lor of tnce 'fhrti,-..-tor ogiatt.: -.Iiraztor uf Are..tor e. Itchy 'fraining wt at,16 tasks aro tt,3319pcil to nviividual Stpport *Xficos,It L, Aistoreary ow!.o ,3to,..:riatz, to estabiieh a to, *tains ,Ieadline. %K.Ik deadline - earPIZIa tiMety atk d to ;41..A.401 iatiAgat allocation a pr..:e.,t44 acti or ionaL,? Paiho-e to -meet on establis1 1Une or tho last =Mot.: -umeAirdon of inaktrretately Drejaml responoe t tnJkttve of dometergaliZfItiutigi =Jeiir requiling oraor etiliormly to meet we ria4,4Dasibilittes- with ;7'71 : 7. V- 4Cait"- C6101 :.;tiA-on Office Head will inatitate and inaintain k..ro,.401ureo are, ae,;eziTery tocasare that iiewline-_,; eAradialied Lythe iiTtiTL,r; f thDiro,.. -tor at ea!, -tiffice of the Deputy Diratior tor :=,'irk:,xtrt us motion r,fther orally or in writ, are strictly afibereti to. An extension it, to cto only far dtht! tx.tuat cetrilelling reaeovo . Aar* no deadline 4,3 :loft 4,y- the Office of the -Dtrier or the Uffit. cif the ;:-ea;aity atrector for 5.;14. dee Elena will e,stailizh a realistic 1aiIk, **tee die Office of tW Directo,- fortl:ort an euaurz that des, (Maine ta mat. . It i, roy aim that toy hormaitaw Aid should i. of miti? Izthn to you. DJ elta Mid, they will it-23stifor to he available at any tit= for AN:113atia- donnovtoe ouiJ iiltitutiOCO, ft Ls ao.aential dant oomph:P=1 .4:aff work ri=ireatisidog thobe.itelltat of the offke otocerneu. normally lozhallng a rihriew by the Cfrt.Ilea% be re,..;eived in the refine...dug office for dae indkated SA -DD/S:RJP: RHW: nfa (1 Dec 64) Distribution: Orig - D/CO 1 - ea following addressee DD/S Subject w/background 1 - DD/S Chrono = St. 14, 4, vviute L-. T. YI04171451.7 Thr9.71TYr ftir ;717-7 ? - Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Approved :DTIRANfilbil213111fiasE1151PCIAiRigg&laggi8q1Nq DATE 0501 To: Colonel White via Mr. Barwe-cman ROOM NO. BUILDING REMARKS: Recommend seven signatures. ? i:007,11 RHW FROM: ROOM NO. BUILDING EXTENSION FORM NO 1 FEB 55 L:1" REPLACES FORM 36-8 WHICH MAY BE USED. GPO 1957-0-439445 (47) 060001-2 Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 ILLEGIB Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Apr ? ? rov44(Kagiialgim 4TR/:08/'&:nqa-pent00780R0005000600 For your information. This was handed to each DD/S Office Head at my staff meeting at 0830 this morning. V),11 L. K. White ( DATE ) FORM NO. 'VI REPLACES FORM 10-101 I AUG 54 WHICH MAY BE USED. I 47 / 1-2 Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 ILLEGIB Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 COPY USN ONLY Approved For ReiedgEW2Ont5lit -?CTEFE1-'84-00780R00 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Communications Director of Logistics Director of Personnel Director of Security Director of Training Chief, Medical Staff DD/S 63-5008 25 November 196 SUBJECT : Actions of Interest to the Office of the Director 1. Each DD/S Office Head will furnish DD/S as soon as possible but in no case later than 1000 hours, Tuesday, 26 November 1963, a memorandum listing all actions for which his Office has any responsibility and in which the O-DCI or O-DD/S either has or should have a particular or special interest. The memorandum will contain a brief status or progress report on each item listed with an estimated date of completion where appropriate and an indication of any action which needs to be taken by anyone outside of the Office, including O-DD/S and/or O-DCI, to ensure completion in a minimum of time. 2. Effective immediately any action in which the O-DCI has a particular or special interest, as distinguished from day-to-day routine, will be given the highest priority attention by DD/S components. Office Heads will establish procedures to ensure that they are personally aware of any such interest com- municated to their Offices and, insofar as it is within the competence of their respective offices to do so, that action including appropriate coordination is completed in a minimum of time. They will also ensure that 0-DD/S is aware of any such O-DCI interest and that O-DD/S is kept fully informed of all com- munications with the O-DCI, either oral or written. 3. Deadlines established by O-DCI or O-DD/S on action requested, either orally or in writing, will be strictly adhered to with extension requested only for the most compelling reasons. Where no deadline has been established by O-DCI or O-DD/S, the Office Head will establish a realistic deadline consistent with these principles of speed of action, advise O-DD/S and ensure that the deadline is met. 4. It is my aim and that of my immediate staff to be of maximum assistance to DD/S Office Heads and to this end we will endeavor to be available for maxi- mum consultation, advice, and assistance to include, in the interest of speed or ?11INISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 ADMINISTRATIVE s INTERNAr USE ONLY Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 economy of time, the review of draft papers. However, such drafts when submitted for preliminary consideration should represent the best efforts of the Office concerned which normally should include a review by the Office Head. I am aware of the heavy and increasing workload which Support services are carrying with restricted budgets and personnel ceilings. However I cannot accept this as an excuse for any failures to comply with the intent and spirit of this memorandum. We are all here to serve the Director who is in the final analysis responsible for all that we do. If our staffs are not now organized to provide this kind of service and completed staff work, reorganization is already overdue. DD/S:LKW:maq(24 Nov 63) Dist: 0- D/CO 1 - Ea following addressee 1 - DD/S Subject 1 - DD/S Chrono 34 Z--)(:5 4 - - /s/ L. K. White Deputy Director for Support 4_DMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY -2- Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R00050006 MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director of Central Intelligence DD/S 63-5044 27 NOV '1963), SUBJECT : Inventory of Actions of Interest to the Office of the Director 1. The attached list represents the major action items for which DD/S offices have a responsibility and in which the Office of the Director has a particular interest. It includes some items in which O-DCI has not formally expressed an interest but of which we think you should be aware. I have not listed actions or activities of a routine or recurring nature which are current and the status of which is known in the Director's office. 2. Steps have been taken to have appropriate action on the items in the attached list concluded as soon as possible. Atta,chment A Enli'itiftl! "or Deputy Director for Support Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Action Item VrnPr ta)21,L?:IC Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIALP84-00780R000500060001-2 Status Action Required 25X1 Reduction in Workload or Increase in Funds At the present rate of production PSD is short approximately $350,000 of funds required in the current fiscal year. A committee has been appointed to review printing requirements to determine if the printing workload can be reduced. for Printing Services Division/OL Need for Additional Funds for Logistics in Addition to Printing Services Division Requirements Air Conditioning - Headquarters Building Logistics submitted a report on the need for $743,000 in additional funds in FY 64 to the Comptroller on 10 September 1963. OL must plan curtailment in services and support to the extent that these funds are not made available. GSA has identified four general problem areas. Definitive studies of corrective action required have been completed on two of these general areas. 2 To the extent the printing workload cannot be reduced by the equivalent of $350,000 in costs it will be necessary to obtain funds from the Comptroller or arbitrary reduction in the workload must be accom- plished by 31 December 1963. FP&BC to determine what funds can be made available to Logistics in order that OL can plan the proper course of action. GSA to conduct definitive studies of the two additional general problem areas and contract for the necessary corrective action. Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Action Item Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Status Proposed Building for Printing Services Division at Langley Downtown Office Space Incentive Contracting Early Retirement Legislation A building at Langley centralizing printing services would greatly improve efficiency in this field. We believe that such a building could be constructed using the $1,730,000 left over from the construction of the headquarters building if these funds are approved by the Bureau of the Budget and our committees for this purpose. We have pressed the GSA to locate approximately 500,000 square feet of office space in Washington in order to provide space required by expansion and in order to vacate the several buildings in the metropolitan area now occupied by the Agency. GSA does not wish to take this matter before their Appropriations Com- mittee and has asked instead that the Agency pay the rent during the term of the lease. Policy approval has been obtained from O-DCI to negotiate where possible? incentive contracts for procurement of services, materiel and possibly Research and Development. Passed by the House. Awaiting action by the Senate Armed Services Committee. 77'7 3 Action Required DCI to determine whether step's should be taken to seek Bureau of the Budget and Congressional committee approval to use the funds left over from the construc- tion of the headquarters building to construct a printing services building. We are ready to discuss with the Comptroller and Bureau of the Budget the financing of this under- taking and this must be completed before further action can be taken. Logistics will initiate a program of incentive contracting in the negotiation of new contracts which are susceptible to the incentive method. Coordination of cost estimates with the CSC. One meeting has been held. Meetings scheduled for 22 and 25 November canceled; to be rescheduled. Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Action Item YS'it! Approved For Release 2002/08/A RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Integration of Personnel information Evaluation Form for Supervisors Lecture(s) on Supervision Accessibility of Personnel Regulations Contract Employment in the United States Salaries of Summer Employees Employee Association Phase I completed. Phase II scheduled for completion by 1 December. A special form to be used in recording evaluations of the performance of supervisory responsibilities is being drafted. The Executive Director has requested a list of topics be compiled for inclusion in a lecture or series of lectures for headquarters' supervisors. Arrangements are near completion for placing manuals of selected personnel regulations in the various branch libraries and announcing to employees that they may consult these regulations when they desire. A survey is being made of the contract employees at headquarters to determine the current ircumstances of their use. A study is being made of the salaries to be paid to summer employees in 1964. Proposed by-laws have been coordinated and are being prepared for discussion with the leaders of the present employees' recreation group. 4 Action Required Follow-up as necessary to ensure timely completion. Scheduled for completion by 11 December. The first rough listing is being refined and revised. Completion scheduled for mid-December. Follow through to completion. Completion scheduled for 16 December. 25X1 Recommendations to be ready by 15 December. It is expected that a Board of Directors for the new association can be elected by mid-December. Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Action Item Approved For Release 2002/08/W;IdA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Action Required 2)(1 Use of Negro Employees Personnel Security Review As a follow-up to a statistical report on the use of negro employees, a small group of cases who apparently have not been assigned to positions commensurate with their education and training are being reviewed with the Career Service concerned. In addition, a study is being made of white employees who hold four-year degrees and have been in grade for four years or more to determine whether their use is consistent with their apparent qualifications. The Office of Security and the IG have completed a review of personnel security procedures in CIA. CRET 5 It is expected that this project will be completed during February 1964. Modification of regulatory issuances to itc rease emphasis on supervisory responsibilities, to standardize procedures ha reporting employee absences, to improve communica- tions with?persons returning from overseas assignment. Security indoctrination programs will be revised to ensure adequate coverage of the supervisory role in security. While proceeding with this action, we await from O-DCI assignment of the responsibility to implement IG recommendations. Approved For Release 2002/08/15 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Action Item Approved For Release 2002/0 T5ta':4' -RDP84-00780R000500060001-2 Status Action Required Personnel Security Reviews -- Community Involuntary Separations 25X1 Damage Assessment of Case Top Secret and Codeword Control All military and civilian employees of the Department of Defense assigned to NPIC are now being security investi- gated and processed in the same manner as CIA personnel. A draft revision Involun- tary Separations, was submitted on 26 November 1963 for coordination by the major components of the Agency. Each Agency component ori inating docu- ments possibly seen 1 Ihas been sent a list of such documents together with damage assessment forms and the review is now proceeding throughout the Agency. A preliminary damage assessment was reported on 20 Nov- ember. The Office of Security is coordinating an Agency-wide review of the pro- cedures used for the handling and accountability of top secret and code- word materials. Questionnaires have been prepared and circulated to people having document control responsibili- ties and to selected users of the infor- mation involved. ?????r