ASSIGNING A SENIOR U.S. MILITARY OFFICER TO THE DO

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84B00049R001603940017-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 5, 2007
Sequence Number: 
17
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 3, 1982
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84B00049R001603940017-6.pdf94.84 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2007/06/05: CIA-RDP84B00049R001603940017-6 4 ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SUBJECT: (Optional) Assigning a Senior U.S. Military Officer'^to the DO FROM: DC/PCS EXTENSION NO. DATE 3 June 1982 TO: (Officer designation, room number, and building) DATE OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom RECEIVED FORWARDED INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) 1 C/PCS 3 UN 1982 2. 3. DDO 4. ~ 5. C-' a -A), 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. FORM 61 O USE PREVIOUS 1_79 EDITIONS Approved For Release 2007/06/05: CIA-RDP84B00049R0016 - 25X1 SECRET MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations Deputy Chief, Policy and Coordination Staff SUBJECT: Assigning a Senior U.S. Military Officer to the DO Herewith a few preliminary and random thoughts on Frank Carlucci's proposal to assign a senior U.S. military officer to the DO: 1. This will obviously require careful consideration. A number of objections, many of them bureaucratic and otherwise negative, will be raised within DoD and the military as well as here in the building. Many will feel threatened. 2. The individual selected should be a senior Army officer with a back- ground in operations1command and staff work rather than intelligence. So that he will retain his own motivation and influence within DoD his next assignment in the military should be identified before he comes to the DO and it should be one of the more sought-after billets for senior Army officers on the rise. 3. His primary role would be as a link between the DO and the non-intel components of the military. He should also become involved in the policy aspects of DO contacts with military intelligence. 4. For example, he could breathe some life into the military's tasking of the DO, hopefully to the point that makes our wide-ranging military targeting, recruitment and collection activities even more relevant to the military's actual intel needs and better appreciated at the military command level. He could also be of assistance in helping us get a better handle on the military's foreign liaison contacts that are intelligence related. This would include improving procedures for managing the disclosure of intelligence. SECRET Approved For Release 2007/06/05: CIA-RDP84B00049R001603940017-6 SECRET 6. His time and attention should not be encumbered by involving him in the process of coordinating the military's routine proposals for clandestine collection. 7. This could be a useful arrangement for both sides but only if they select the type of officer indicated above. Frank Carlucci will encounter considerable resistance from entrenched elements in the intel bureaucracy at DoD. For this reason I recommend that we in the DO avoid raising this with any of our military counterparts below Carlucci's level at least until he has had time to think-about it further and lay the groundwork. SECRET